Hands and Results
1 |
♠K6
♥T432
♦A876
♣J62
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠J84
♥QJ86
♦43
♣K743
|
♠AQ2
♥AK97
♦Q95
♣AQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.92 0.08 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
140 4.75 1.25 3-Smith-Lane vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
180 3.58 2.42 5-DeKock-Rose vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
400 2.42 3.58 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
420 1.25 4.75 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 3-Bache-Mogck
460 0.08 5.92 7-Patel-Patel vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
|
2 |
♠A64
♥KT5
♦AKQ987
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠KJ9753
♥AJ
♦6
♣KJ42
|
♠-
♥98742
♦T42
♣98653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 5NT ♣4/3 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.92 0.08 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
150 4.17 1.83 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
150 4.17 1.83 5-DeKock-Rose vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
130 1.83 4.17 3-Smith-Lane vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
130 1.83 4.17 7-Patel-Patel vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
100 0.08 5.92 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 3-Bache-Mogck
|
3 |
♠74
♥AT852
♦A65
♣A83
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠T9
♥Q9
♦J987432
♣95
|
♠AKJ
♥J7
♦QT
♣QJT762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.17 1.83 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 2-Yost-Meyers
450 4.17 1.83 4-Lange-Williams vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
450 4.17 1.83 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
450 4.17 1.83 7-Patel-Patel vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
420 1.25 4.75 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
140 0.08 5.92 5-DeKock-Rose vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
|
4 |
♠AT62
♥AQ754
♦J2
♣T8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠-
♥T83
♦AKQ983
♣AK75
|
♠KQ854
♥62
♦T65
♣962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.33 0.67 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
100 5.33 0.67 7-Patel-Patel vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
130 3.00 3.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
130 3.00 3.00 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 2-Yost-Meyers
150 0.67 5.33 4-Lange-Williams vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
150 0.67 5.33 5-DeKock-Rose vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
|
5 |
♠KJ
♥A973
♦Q65
♣9862
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠9543
♥862
♦J872
♣54
|
♠Q86
♥KJ4
♦K4
♣AQJT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4/3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.92 0.08 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
100 4.75 1.25 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
90 3.58 2.42 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
50 1.83 4.17 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
50 1.83 4.17 7-Patel-Patel vs 2-Yost-Meyers
90 0.08 5.92 3-Smith-Lane vs 3-Bache-Mogck
|
6 |
♠QJ98632
♥KQ97
♦-
♣JT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AK
♥JT85
♦T963
♣A82
|
♠54
♥A4
♦J7542
♣9654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 7-Patel-Patel vs 2-Yost-Meyers
110 4.17 1.83 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
110 4.17 1.83 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
50 1.83 4.17 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
50 1.83 4.17 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
100 0.08 5.92 3-Smith-Lane vs 3-Bache-Mogck
|
7 |
♠6
♥9432
♦4
♣AQJ9542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠K3
♥QT5
♦Q8763
♣K73
|
♠AQJ982
♥J6
♦J95
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.92 0.08 3-Smith-Lane vs 2-Yost-Meyers
150 4.75 1.25 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Bache-Mogck
130 3.58 2.42 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
120 2.42 3.58 4-Lange-Williams vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
100 1.25 4.75 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
110 0.08 5.92 7-Patel-Patel vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
|
8 |
♠JT942
♥542
♦A73
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q86
♥AKJ3
♦Q86
♣KJ6
|
♠-
♥T9
♦JT542
♣AT7532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.92 0.08 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
50 4.17 1.83 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
50 4.17 1.83 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Bache-Mogck
130 1.83 4.17 3-Smith-Lane vs 2-Yost-Meyers
130 1.83 4.17 7-Patel-Patel vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
180 0.08 5.92 4-Lange-Williams vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
|
9 |
♠J83
♥K62
♦QJT94
♣J3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠KT6
♥QT985
♦7
♣9642
|
♠AQ75
♥AJ4
♦K6
♣AQT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1/-♦ 5♥ 5♠ 3/2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 3-Smith-Lane vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
120 5.00 1.00 7-Patel-Patel vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
170 4.00 2.00 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
620 3.00 3.00 5-DeKock-Rose vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
650 1.50 4.50 4-Lange-Williams vs 3-Bache-Mogck
650 1.50 4.50 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 2-Yost-Meyers
680 0.00 6.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
|
10 |
♠AT832
♥6
♦T65
♣9654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠KJ6
♥AQJ54
♦AJ82
♣7
|
♠Q754
♥KT2
♦K3
♣KJT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4/3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 0.50 3-Smith-Lane vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
100 5.50 0.50 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 2-Yost-Meyers
120 4.00 2.00 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
140 2.00 4.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
140 2.00 4.00 5-DeKock-Rose vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
140 2.00 4.00 7-Patel-Patel vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
620 0.00 6.00 4-Lange-Williams vs 3-Bache-Mogck
|
11 |
♠AJ8
♥QT97
♦KQT62
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠QT942
♥K8
♦A5
♣KJ74
|
♠6
♥J542
♦J984
♣AT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣4/5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.92 0.08 3-Smith-Lane vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
100 4.75 1.25 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
50 3.00 3.00 4-Lange-Williams vs 2-Yost-Meyers
50 3.00 3.00 5-DeKock-Rose vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
100 1.25 4.75 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
110 0.08 5.92 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Bache-Mogck
|
12 |
♠A8652
♥J9652
♦K3
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠93
♥K3
♦AQ74
♣J8643
|
♠J4
♥AQT7
♦J862
♣AK2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
110 4.75 1.25 3-Smith-Lane vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
100 3.00 3.00 5-DeKock-Rose vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
100 3.00 3.00 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
50 0.67 5.33 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Bache-Mogck
50 0.67 5.33 4-Lange-Williams vs 2-Yost-Meyers
|
13 |
♠AK2
♥QT9864
♦K65
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠98
♥3
♦92
♣AKT98765
|
♠QT753
♥A5
♦AJ83
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4/3♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 4NT ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.92 0.08 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
620 4.75 1.25 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
100 3.58 2.42 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 2-Yost-Meyers
100 2.42 3.58 7-Patel-Patel vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
200 1.25 4.75 4-Lange-Williams vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
600 0.08 5.92 5-DeKock-Rose vs 3-Bache-Mogck
|
14 |
♠QJ942
♥J3
♦94
♣7643
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠753
♥Q87
♦J862
♣JT2
|
♠KT86
♥K6542
♦Q
♣A95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.92 0.08 5-DeKock-Rose vs 3-Bache-Mogck
110 3.58 2.42 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 2-Yost-Meyers
110 3.58 2.42 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
110 3.58 2.42 7-Patel-Patel vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
90 1.25 4.75 4-Lange-Williams vs 1-Garbe-Gozesky
50 0.08 5.92 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
|
15 |
♠953
♥KQ98
♦J7
♣AKJ9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠KJT
♥AT73
♦8542
♣T3
|
♠Q862
♥652
♦AKT93
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.92 0.08 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 3-Bache-Mogck
110 4.17 1.83 4-Lange-Williams vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
110 4.17 1.83 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
90 2.42 3.58 3-Smith-Lane vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
100 1.25 4.75 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
300 0.08 5.92 5-DeKock-Rose vs 2-Yost-Meyers
|
16 |
♠J2
♥KJ7632
♦K42
♣T3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠76
♥T98
♦AQ853
♣J97
|
♠AKQT53
♥AQ4
♦T9
♣Q5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.33 0.67 3-Smith-Lane vs 5-Richard-Rayborn
140 5.33 0.67 5-DeKock-Rose vs 2-Yost-Meyers
150 3.58 2.42 8-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 8-Cirlin-Powell
170 1.25 4.75 2-Weinberg-Weien vs 3-Bache-Mogck
170 1.25 4.75 4-Lange-Williams vs 7-Cleary-Elphick
170 1.25 4.75 6-Pippenger-Pippenger vs 4-Sandstrom-Mackay
|