Hands and Results
1 |
♠AQT954
♥63
♦AJT93
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠7
♥JT9842
♦K7
♣KJ85
|
♠8632
♥A
♦65
♣AQ9762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ ♣3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦0 ♥5/6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦6 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
100 0.50 1.50 5♣ E -2 ♠K 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 3-Province-Tremblay
100 0.50 1.50 5♣* E -1 ♠K 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
2 |
♠AT72
♥AJ764
♦4
♣J42
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠8
♥KT932
♦QT852
♣Q5
|
♠KJ95
♥Q85
♦A7
♣AT87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ W ♦4 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
200 1.00 1.00 3♠* N -1 ♥5 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 3-Province-Tremblay
300 0.00 2.00 2♦ S -3 ♠8 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
3 |
♠2
♥QT82
♦Q97643
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠983
♥K5
♦AT8
♣T9753
|
♠AQT76
♥J964
♦52
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♣5 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
400 1.00 1.00 3N S ♣5 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♣5 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 3-Province-Tremblay
|
4 |
♠K9652
♥A632
♦Q
♣Q65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠Q843
♥4
♦JT32
♣AKJ4
|
♠AJ
♥JT95
♦AK64
♣T92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣8 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
130 1.00 1.00 2♦ W +2 ♣5 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
180 0.00 2.00 1N E +3 ♥K 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 3-Province-Tremblay
|
5 |
♠KJ9873
♥Q7
♦82
♣865
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AQ5
♥A432
♦KQ9
♣KQ4
|
♠42
♥JT6
♦AJT4
♣AJ73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3/5♥ 2♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N W +2 ♠9 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
460 1.50 0.50 3N W +2 ♠7 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
990 0.00 2.00 6N W ♠9 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 3-Province-Tremblay
|
6 |
♠986
♥Q974
♦K942
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠J
♥K6
♦J85
♣Q987543
|
♠K75
♥853
♦AQT3
♣JT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣9 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♥6 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 3-Province-Tremblay
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♣8 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
|
7 |
♠Q
♥QT52
♦A52
♣T9432
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AK7652
♥A97
♦J8
♣Q7
|
♠84
♥KJ86
♦T93
♣AKJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥2 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 3-Province-Tremblay
620 1.00 1.00 4♠ W ♣T 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
650 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♥2 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
|
8 |
♠J8
♥K874
♦AK4
♣J986
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T943
♥JT62
♦JT7
♣T4
|
♠752
♥A5
♦Q652
♣Q732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 5N N ♦2 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
400 1.00 1.00 3N N ♦2 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
100 0.00 2.00 6N N -2 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 3-Province-Tremblay
|
9 |
♠KQ6
♥J9863
♦AT5
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AJ9
♥Q72
♦J42
♣T832
|
♠87543
♥54
♦K98
♣K76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠8 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 3-Province-Tremblay
50 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠4 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
|
10 |
♠AT4
♥AJ7
♦AT95
♣953
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠J7
♥QT
♦7432
♣AKJ74
|
♠983
♥K9852
♦86
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 1♠ S +4 ♥Q 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
170 1.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♣K 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson vs 3-Province-Tremblay
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♣A 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
|
11 |
♠T9
♥KQ92
♦QT8
♣A765
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠765
♥A85
♦A7
♣KQT84
|
♠A843
♥T74
♦KJ52
♣93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♥2 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 3-Province-Tremblay
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♣9 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
150 0.00 2.00 1N W +2 ♥K 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
12 |
♠Q7432
♥K97
♦J753
♣T
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠T8
♥QJ862
♦8
♣KJ982
|
♠AKJ965
♥5
♦AT64
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ E -1 ♦K 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E ♣6 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 3-Province-Tremblay
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦K 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
|
13 |
♠542
♥JT43
♦Q87
♣Q63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠873
♥A76
♦AT653
♣74
|
♠AKJ9
♥Q985
♦K9
♣T52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♣A 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 3-Province-Tremblay
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♣J 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
210 0.00 2.00 1N E +4 ♠6 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
14 |
♠KQ654
♥JT75
♦J9
♣53
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠82
♥KQ9642
♦742
♣92
|
♠T973
♥83
♦AK6
♣KJ76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N N ♥8 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 3-Province-Tremblay
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♥8 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
150 0.00 2.00 3N N -3 ♥8 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
|
15 |
♠K97
♥KQJT82
♦T5
♣93
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠JT2
♥64
♦43
♣QJ8654
|
♠Q8
♥9
♦QJ9872
♣KT72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣Q 5-Hilbert-Poizner vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
680 1.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣6 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 3-Province-Tremblay
680 1.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♦Q 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
16 |
♠KJ9832
♥KJ8
♦A82
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠QT
♥6532
♦QJ3
♣K742
|
♠A5
♥QT7
♦K965
♣Q965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♣6 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♥7 3-Province-Tremblay vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
50 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♦5 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
|
17 |
♠K843
♥K7
♦K82
♣AKJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠7652
♥JT95
♦AT7
♣95
|
♠QJT
♥Q86432
♦J54
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥5 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
460 0.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥4 3-Province-Tremblay vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
460 0.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥4 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
|
18 |
♠J983
♥QJ76
♦K7
♣K65
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠-
♥KT
♦QT65432
♣J983
|
♠AK764
♥A93
♦J9
♣Q72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 3N E -4 ♥8 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
150 1.00 1.00 3N W -3 ♥6 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
430 0.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♥4 3-Province-Tremblay vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
19 |
♠K85
♥64
♦KJT63
♣865
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q6
♥Q
♦Q987542
♣JT3
|
♠AT97
♥A8532
♦-
♣K972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♥6 3-Province-Tremblay vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
120 1.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠T 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
50 0.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♠7 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
|
20 |
♠64
♥AJ764
♦A865
♣52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AKQ7
♥KT3
♦Q3
♣KT93
|
♠5
♥985
♦KJT4
♣AQJ86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3/5♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 1.00 1.00 3N W ♥6 2-Erikson-Erikson vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
600 1.00 1.00 3N W ♥6 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
600 1.00 1.00 3N W ♥4 3-Province-Tremblay vs 1-Mathur-Taylor
|
21 |
♠AK8753
♥K43
♦T
♣742
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠T6
♥J7
♦AJ76543
♣Q6
|
♠42
♥AQ952
♦Q98
♣853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦2 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣8 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♣A 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
100 0.00 2.00 5♠ N -1 ♦Q 3-Province-Tremblay vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
|
22 |
♠J9653
♥AQ
♦J64
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠74
♥KJ854
♦A9
♣Q974
|
♠A8
♥632
♦KQ832
♣T52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ -/1♦ 2♥ ♦6/7 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥6 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♠A 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 3-Province-Tremblay vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
|
23 |
♠T9876
♥K3
♦K763
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A32
♥J985
♦QT84
♣A7
|
♠K4
♥AQ64
♦A52
♣T932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.00 0.00 3♥ W ♠T 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
170 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♠5 3-Province-Tremblay vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
200 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +2 ♠T 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
|
24 |
♠2
♥T753
♦AK
♣K75432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠QJ4
♥Q62
♦T98543
♣Q
|
♠AK9753
♥AK98
♦7
♣86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ ♣2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♣A 3-Province-Tremblay vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥4 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ E ♦Q 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
|
25 |
♠Q3
♥QJT
♦AT8743
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠T87654
♥96
♦KQ9
♣97
|
♠A2
♥AK7542
♦2
♣A854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ N -1 ♥A 1-Mathur-Taylor vs 4-Van Hemert-Atkinson
100 0.50 1.50 4♦ N -2 ♥A 6-Kanekar-Kvashny vs 5-Hilbert-Poizner
100 0.50 1.50 3♦ N -2 ♥A 3-Province-Tremblay vs 2-Erikson-Erikson
|