Hands and Results
1 |
♠7
♥974
♦J732
♣AT754
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AT98
♥AQ6
♦AQT96
♣3
|
♠QJ653
♥JT
♦K84
♣KQJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3/4 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 5♠ W ♦5 6-Creamer-Ives vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
450 3.50 0.50 4♠ E +1 ♦5 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Haines-Howard
480 1.50 2.50 5♠ E +1 ♦5 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +2 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 1-Locke-Rake
980 0.00 4.00 6♠ E ♦5 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
|
2 |
♠A7
♥K9543
♦A953
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠KQ54
♥QT7
♦4
♣AQJ97
|
♠T862
♥A86
♦KQT76
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠3 NT3/4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♠A 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♥4 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Haines-Howard
170 2.50 1.50 1♠ W +3 ♥4 6-Creamer-Ives vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
200 1.00 3.00 1♠ W +4 ♠A 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 1-Locke-Rake
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♥J 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
|
3 |
♠AJ874
♥Q
♦AJT65
♣T8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠652
♥T9
♦Q8
♣AJ9742
|
♠QT
♥KJ642
♦K942
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣5 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦4 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣6 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 1-Locke-Rake
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣5 6-Creamer-Ives vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ N ♣5 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 8-Haines-Howard
|
4 |
♠K5
♥KQT86
♦6
♣98763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJT92
♥753
♦J74
♣4
|
♠763
♥AJ2
♦KT82
♣AQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 3♠ 2/1NT ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♥Q 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 6-Creamer-Ives
100 2.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦5 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 8-Haines-Howard vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥K 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♦5 1-Locke-Rake vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
5 |
♠AKJ652
♥942
♦943
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠74
♥AJT6
♦AKJ7
♣KT4
|
♠3
♥KQ753
♦5
♣AJ8752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 2.00 5♥ E +1 ♠9 8-Haines-Howard vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
480 2.00 2.00 5♥ E +1 ♠8 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 6-Creamer-Ives
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♠A 1-Locke-Rake vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +2 ♠A 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠8 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
|
6 |
♠76
♥QJ42
♦QT853
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT982
♥K9
♦KJ
♣K952
|
♠KQJ
♥765
♦742
♣J763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ S ♠A 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 6-Creamer-Ives
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♠7 8-Haines-Howard vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♥Q 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♣Q 1-Locke-Rake vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♣Q 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
|
7 |
♠AKQJ9
♥QJT5
♦43
♣K4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠32
♥A32
♦952
♣T9872
|
♠T765
♥K97
♦AKQT
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♦A 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♦J 8-Haines-Howard vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
110 1.50 2.50 1♠ N +1 ♦A 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Locke-Rake
110 1.50 2.50 2♥ N ♦A 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 ♦K 6-Creamer-Ives vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
8 |
♠AT876
♥Q7
♦A
♣AKT54
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠K32
♥K98
♦76532
♣63
|
♠94
♥J6543
♦984
♣972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 5/6♦ 4♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 3.50 0.50 6♠ N +1 ♠6 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
1010 3.50 0.50 6♠ N +1 ♦8 8-Haines-Howard vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
510 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 ♥4 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Locke-Rake
480 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +2 ♠4 6-Creamer-Ives vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
460 0.00 4.00 3N S +2 ♦7 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
|
9 |
♠J5
♥T3
♦AJT96
♣8654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT642
♥AKJ
♦74
♣Q97
|
♠Q8
♥987654
♦852
♣T3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♠4 6-Creamer-Ives vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S ♥A 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♠4 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
50 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥A 8-Haines-Howard vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
150 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -3 ♥A 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 1-Locke-Rake
|
10 |
♠8
♥AQ7632
♦K8
♣Q876
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠K
♥54
♦AT9742
♣AK95
|
♠AQT9432
♥98
♦QJ5
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦2 ♠3 |
EW: 4♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠* E -1 ♥K 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
300 3.00 1.00 4♥ N -3 ♣K 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 8-Haines-Howard
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♠4 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♦6 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♣2 1-Locke-Rake vs 6-Creamer-Ives
|
11 |
♠J4
♥AJ6
♦AQ9865
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠9
♥K982
♦JT
♣K95432
|
♠QT8653
♥5
♦K7432
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♠9 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♠9 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♣4 1-Locke-Rake vs 6-Creamer-Ives
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♠9 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
150 0.00 4.00 5♥ S -3 ♠9 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 8-Haines-Howard
|
12 |
♠-
♥T9764
♦652
♣Q9654
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q98
♥A32
♦QT9
♣KJ87
|
♠JT54
♥Q5
♦AJ873
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 3/2NT ♣6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♥T 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♥T 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♥9 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♥4 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 8-Haines-Howard
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ E ♠A 1-Locke-Rake vs 6-Creamer-Ives
|
13 |
♠T53
♥K965
♦83
♣QT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠AK74
♥AT43
♦J64
♣85
|
♠J986
♥872
♦A52
♣J93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♠A 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ S ♠A 1-Locke-Rake vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ S ♠K 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 6-Creamer-Ives
90 1.00 3.00 2♣ S ♠K 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♠A 8-Haines-Howard vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
14 |
♠QT82
♥A6
♦AQT63
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠J4
♥Q8542
♦J5
♣T962
|
♠-
♥KJT973
♦K872
♣743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7/6♣ 5♦ 7♠ 7NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣0 ♦2 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1510 4.00 0.00 7♠ S ♥2 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 6-Creamer-Ives
1010 2.50 1.50 6♠ S +1 ♥4 1-Locke-Rake vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
1010 2.50 1.50 6♠ S +1 ♥3 8-Haines-Howard vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
510 0.50 3.50 5♠ S +2 ♥4 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
510 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +3 ♥4 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
15 |
♠AKT94
♥QJT32
♦-
♣874
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠J
♥K864
♦QJ5
♣KQJT6
|
♠Q875
♥975
♦AT8732
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2/1♥ 4/3♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 ♥A 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 6-Creamer-Ives
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♥7 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦Q 8-Haines-Howard vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ N -1 ♥9 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
400 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -4 ♥9 1-Locke-Rake vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
|
16 |
♠8654
♥JT876
♦952
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT732
♥A3
♦QT87
♣A9
|
♠QJ
♥KQ954
♦J3
♣8763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠* W -1 ♣Q 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S ♥A 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 1-Locke-Rake
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 ♣Q 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 ♣Q 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 6-Creamer-Ives
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -2 ♥A 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Haines-Howard
|
17 |
♠KT
♥QJT
♦KQT76
♣K73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠7643
♥A96
♦A5
♣QJ95
|
♠J2
♥7532
♦J9432
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ 2NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.50 0.50 2N N +2 ♦3 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Haines-Howard
180 3.50 0.50 1N N +3 ♥2 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 1-Locke-Rake
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣Q 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 6-Creamer-Ives
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣Q 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♥5 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
|
18 |
♠J3
♥KQ6
♦AQ92
♣7643
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q64
♥92
♦J543
♣AQJ5
|
♠KT
♥J853
♦KT76
♣T92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦6 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♦3 9-Joerger-Naschold vs 6-Creamer-Ives
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦5 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Haines-Howard
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦3 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 1-Locke-Rake
300 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 ♥9 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
|
19 |
♠AJ765
♥853
♦QT87
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠98
♥A97
♦K63
♣AJT54
|
♠QT2
♥Q42
♦J952
♣863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1/2NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4/3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♠8 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♦3 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♠9 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
50 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♦3 6-Creamer-Ives vs 8-Haines-Howard
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♠9 1-Locke-Rake vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
|
20 |
♠A952
♥A3
♦QT6
♣AJT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KT7
♥KJT8
♦A92
♣862
|
♠J8
♥Q97
♦KJ74
♣KQ95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ N -1 ♣K 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ E +1 ♣5 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
300 1.50 2.50 1N N -3 ♦7 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
300 1.50 2.50 1N N -3 ♦4 6-Creamer-Ives vs 8-Haines-Howard
500 0.00 4.00 1N* N -2 ♣5 1-Locke-Rake vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
|
21 |
♠63
♥T98
♦J7432
♣843
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠542
♥K762
♦QT
♣AK92
|
♠A
♥AQJ4
♦A86
♣QJ765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N W +2 ♠6 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 5-Sullivan-Nuccio
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠K 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠K 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +2 ♠K 6-Creamer-Ives vs 8-Haines-Howard
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ W ♠6 1-Locke-Rake vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
|
22 |
♠J76
♥KQ
♦QJ9874
♣Q5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠A85
♥T9
♦KT32
♣AKJT
|
♠932
♥87643
♦65
♣942
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 4.00 0.00 3N* W -4 ♦Q 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Creamer-Ives
180 3.00 1.00 2♦* N ♣9 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 8-Haines-Howard
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♥T 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ N ♣9 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣T 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 1-Locke-Rake
|
23 |
♠732
♥AQ5
♦9876
♣654
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠KQT98
♥86
♦AJ
♣8732
|
♠654
♥974
♦52
♣KQJT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠K 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 8-Haines-Howard
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠K 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ S ♠K 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Creamer-Ives
620 0.50 3.50 4♥ S ♣8 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 1-Locke-Rake
|
24 |
♠K96543
♥3
♦Q3
♣8763
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q7
♥AT984
♦J976
♣QT
|
♠AT
♥KQ65
♦K854
♣J52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥K 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 6-Creamer-Ives
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♣7 7-Feldman-Cooper vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠3 2-Tatham-Thomas vs 8-Haines-Howard
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♠3 4-Jarvis-Lawrence vs 3-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -2 ♥A 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 1-Locke-Rake
|
25 |
♠985432
♥AK32
♦KJ
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠JT
♥987
♦9642
♣JT97
|
♠Q7
♥Q64
♦AQT7
♣AQ65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♥ 4/3♠ 3/2NT ♣5 ♦6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♥4 6-Creamer-Ives vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♠7 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
300 2.00 2.00 1N E -3 ♠K 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
170 0.50 3.50 3♠ N +1 ♠Q 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ S +2 ♣J 8-Haines-Howard vs 1-Locke-Rake
|
26 |
♠AK7432
♥KJ9
♦4
♣T76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠QJ96
♥A3
♦KT62
♣K98
|
♠T85
♥QT76
♦J75
♣QJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ NT6 |
EW: 1NT ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
160 4.00 0.00 1♠* N ♦J 6-Creamer-Ives vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
100 2.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♥7 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♣J 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
200 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -2 ♦J 8-Haines-Howard vs 1-Locke-Rake
300 0.00 4.00 1N S -3 ♣8 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
|
27 |
♠A92
♥KQ96543
♦94
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠KQJ65
♥T
♦J85
♣AK86
|
♠T73
♥J8
♦T32
♣97543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 5NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 4.00 0.00 6♥ N +1 ♠T 8-Haines-Howard vs 1-Locke-Rake
510 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +3 ♠T 6-Creamer-Ives vs 2-Tatham-Thomas
510 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +3 ♠7 3-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 9-Joerger-Naschold
510 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +3 ♠3 5-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 4-Jarvis-Lawrence
510 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +3 ♠3 10-Andrews-Andrews vs 7-Feldman-Cooper
|