Hands and Results
1 |
♠K97
♥K42
♦A742
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠A8542
♥9
♦J3
♣AK943
|
♠QT3
♥QJ86
♦T98
♣752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S ♣A 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Pia-Carson
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S ♣A 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 5-Bache-Mogck
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ S ♣A 5-Findley-Findley vs 4-Levin-Rumph
150 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -3 ♣A 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W +1 ♥2 4-Courtney-Glover vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
|
2 |
♠J8742
♥K874
♦JT7
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AK96
♥J5
♦532
♣Q542
|
♠5
♥A62
♦A9864
♣AKT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 ♥3 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 5-Bache-Mogck
90 3.00 1.00 1N E 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
110 1.50 2.50 2♦ E +1 ♠3 5-Findley-Findley vs 4-Levin-Rumph
110 1.50 2.50 2♣ E +1 ♣3 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Pia-Carson
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥4 4-Courtney-Glover vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
|
3 |
♠J954
♥AJT6
♦-
♣A9765
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKT63
♥Q7
♦AKQ3
♣82
|
♠72
♥K54
♦JT9852
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ N ♠7 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 ♣6 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 5-Bache-Mogck
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♣Q 5-Findley-Findley vs 4-Levin-Rumph
600 1.00 3.00 5♦ E ♣Q 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Pia-Carson
660 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♣Q 4-Courtney-Glover vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
|
4 |
♠J64
♥QJ5
♦A62
♣AJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠K752
♥864
♦QJ543
♣6
|
♠AT9
♥K32
♦987
♣T432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥2 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 5-Bache-Mogck
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +3 ♣6 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 1-Pia-Carson
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +3 ♣6 4-Courtney-Glover vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♠9 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
100 0.50 3.50 5♣ N -1 ♦9 5-Findley-Findley vs 4-Levin-Rumph
|
5 |
♠JT98
♥6
♦AJ932
♣QT7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q32
♥8754
♦K
♣J9853
|
♠K65
♥AKQ9
♦Q854
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4/3♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♦6/5 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♦T 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 4-Levin-Rumph
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♥2 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦6 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♠A 4-Courtney-Glover vs 1-Pia-Carson
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♠4 5-Findley-Findley vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
|
6 |
♠T3
♥84
♦AK7543
♣832
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠K4
♥KQJ96
♦QT8
♣J64
|
♠J9875
♥T532
♦J92
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♣ S +3 ♥K 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +2 ♥2 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ S +1 ♥K 5-Findley-Findley vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
50 1.00 3.00 6♣ S -1 ♥K 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 4-Levin-Rumph
150 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -3 ♥K 4-Courtney-Glover vs 1-Pia-Carson
|
7 |
♠AJ65
♥J432
♦T52
♣T3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠T84
♥A96
♦AK83
♣AQ2
|
♠K32
♥K75
♦9
♣KJ9864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♣ E +2 ♠7 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ W ♠5 4-Courtney-Glover vs 1-Pia-Carson
660 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠A 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
660 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠5 5-Findley-Findley vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
690 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♠6 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 4-Levin-Rumph
|
8 |
♠J96
♥K42
♦AQT93
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T8
♥J9
♦76542
♣KQ92
|
♠AQ72
♥Q87
♦KJ8
♣T43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4/3♥ 2♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♣ W -4 ♠J 5-Findley-Findley vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♠8 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 4-Levin-Rumph
50 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♠A 4-Courtney-Glover vs 1-Pia-Carson
50 1.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♦7 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♣K 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
|
9 |
♠QJ2
♥KQT
♦JT43
♣Q32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠96
♥86432
♦52
♣AKT7
|
♠K75
♥J975
♦AKQ9
♣65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠6 |
EW: 3/2♥ 1/-♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♠7/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♠ S -2 ♣A 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♠A 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 1-Pia-Carson
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦3 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦3 5-Findley-Findley vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
170 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +2 ♣2 4-Courtney-Glover vs 5-Bache-Mogck
|
10 |
♠642
♥T763
♦K86
♣KQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AK87
♥Q94
♦A5
♣AJ84
|
♠QJ95
♥52
♦JT9743
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3/5 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N W ♥3 5-Findley-Findley vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥A 4-Courtney-Glover vs 5-Bache-Mogck
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♥A 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
180 1.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♥4 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥3 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 1-Pia-Carson
|
11 |
♠AJ74
♥A4
♦K873
♣T52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠T862
♥QJ762
♦AT9
♣3
|
♠K
♥K83
♦Q542
♣AKQJ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♣ E -1 ♦J 5-Findley-Findley vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣4 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 1-Pia-Carson
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♦3 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♦J 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♦J 4-Courtney-Glover vs 5-Bache-Mogck
|
12 |
♠AQT
♥A97
♦93
♣KQ942
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠J85
♥86
♦T762
♣T753
|
♠K9
♥KT53
♦KQ85
♣J86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5/4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦4 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
600 3.00 1.00 3N N ♥7 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 1-Pia-Carson
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♦K 4-Courtney-Glover vs 5-Bache-Mogck
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♦5 5-Findley-Findley vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♦5 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
|
13 |
♠3
♥KQ5
♦AQ4
♣JT8532
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJ72
♥A842
♦K7
♣KQ
|
♠KT9
♥T7
♦T83
♣A9764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 2/3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -3 ♥K 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -2 ♣J 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥5 4-Courtney-Glover vs 4-Levin-Rumph
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♣J 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♣J 5-Findley-Findley vs 1-Pia-Carson
|
14 |
♠Q84
♥AT74
♦Q652
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠J6
♥86532
♦K9
♣KJ75
|
♠AT753
♥KJ
♦A84
♣AQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♥7 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦5 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
120 2.00 2.00 2N E ♣2 4-Courtney-Glover vs 4-Levin-Rumph
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♥4 5-Findley-Findley vs 1-Pia-Carson
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥4 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
|
15 |
♠AJ8
♥T982
♦AQ875
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠T643
♥K5
♦JT942
♣J4
|
♠K5
♥AJ764
♦6
♣97632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♣3 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥7 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥6 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♥5 4-Courtney-Glover vs 4-Levin-Rumph
100 1.50 2.50 2♣ S -1 ♥K 5-Findley-Findley vs 1-Pia-Carson
|
16 |
♠8652
♥Q3
♦Q5
♣A9742
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠74
♥KJT97
♦J97
♣J65
|
♠AKJT9
♥A642
♦T32
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 1.00 2♦ S +1 ♠7 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 5-Bache-Mogck
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ N ♠A 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ N ♠A 5-Findley-Findley vs 1-Pia-Carson
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 4-Courtney-Glover vs 4-Levin-Rumph
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♦Q 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
|
17 |
♠Q3
♥AQJT42
♦72
♣KJ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AJ74
♥7
♦AQ943
♣843
|
♠965
♥85
♦J65
♣AQT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1/2 ♦2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♣A 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 1-Pia-Carson
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♠9 4-Courtney-Glover vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣T 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠5 5-Findley-Findley vs 5-Bache-Mogck
|
18 |
♠QJ987
♥KQJ
♦AJ97
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠T64
♥A864
♦K6
♣AK74
|
♠AK3
♥T932
♦85432
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ -/1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT5/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1♠ N +1 ♣8 5-Findley-Findley vs 5-Bache-Mogck
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ W 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 1-Pia-Carson
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦A 4-Courtney-Glover vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
300 0.50 3.50 3N N -3 ♥2 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
300 0.50 3.50 3N N -3 ♥2 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
|
19 |
♠AKJ4
♥AKJ32
♦-
♣AKT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠83
♥Q974
♦T96
♣QJ43
|
♠T9652
♥T865
♦J3
♣76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 7♦ 5♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0/1 ♦0 ♥2 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 3.00 1.00 6N N +1 ♠5 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
1020 3.00 1.00 6N N +1 ♠5 5-Findley-Findley vs 5-Bache-Mogck
1020 3.00 1.00 6N N +1 ♠2 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 1-Pia-Carson
520 1.00 3.00 3N N +4 ♠5 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
300 0.00 4.00 6♥* N -2 ♣7 4-Courtney-Glover vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
|
20 |
♠76
♥AJ8
♦AK42
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AKJ42
♥K964
♦J76
♣T
|
♠QT985
♥5
♦T9
♣A8532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠3 |
EW: 4♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 1-DeKock-Wilson vs 2-Vallacher-Mencinger
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ W ♣J 2-Beaton-Johnson vs 4-Levin-Rumph
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦A 4-Courtney-Glover vs 3-Tobias-Tobias
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦A 5-Findley-Findley vs 5-Bache-Mogck
620 1.00 3.00 4♠ W 3-Tucker-Stewart vs 1-Pia-Carson
|