Hands and Results
1 |
♠JT875
♥T8
♦876
♣765
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠9
♥A932
♦AKT542
♣83
|
♠AK6432
♥J65
♦Q3
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♦ 3/2♥ 3/2♠ 4/1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥K 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
50 4.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣6 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
110 2.50 2.50 2♠ E ♠Q 6-Bishop-Bartley vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
110 2.50 2.50 3♦ W ♣7 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
460 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♥K 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 10-Hartman-Howard
500 0.00 5.00 5♣* S -3 ♥A 3-Matson-Ward vs 11-Roddy-Ives
|
2 |
♠852
♥K85
♦9832
♣J76
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKT74
♥Q43
♦K4
♣KT3
|
♠J93
♥J962
♦JT7
♣AQ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 ♦8 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
140 4.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 ♦6 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
170 3.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♦9 6-Bishop-Bartley vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
180 2.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♦2 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
400 1.00 4.00 3N W ♣6 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 10-Hartman-Howard
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ W ♦9 3-Matson-Ward vs 11-Roddy-Ives
|
3 |
♠QJ87
♥J5
♦K5
♣87532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠954
♥7432
♦Q7
♣AJT4
|
♠KT63
♥986
♦JT86
♣96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣T 6-Bishop-Bartley vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
400 2.50 2.50 3N S ♣J 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 10-Hartman-Howard
400 2.50 2.50 3N S ♣6 3-Matson-Ward vs 11-Roddy-Ives
400 2.50 2.50 3N S ♣4 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
400 2.50 2.50 3N N ♣6 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
50 0.00 5.00 3N S -1 ♣J 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
|
4 |
♠Q94
♥Q97
♦AK43
♣T96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AKT3
♥A2
♦T962
♣KJ7
|
♠J5
♥JT5
♦7
♣AQ85432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 3NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 3♣ E +2 ♥4 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
600 3.50 1.50 3N W ♦A 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
600 3.50 1.50 3N W ♦A 2-Moyer-Byrne vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
620 2.00 3.00 5♣ W +1 ♦K 11-Roddy-Ives vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
630 1.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♦3 10-Hartman-Howard vs 3-Matson-Ward
660 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♦A 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
|
5 |
♠AKQ
♥A9642
♦T53
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠972
♥J5
♦A86
♣J9842
|
♠JT5
♥KQ87
♦J972
♣T3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♣T 2-Moyer-Byrne vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
600 4.00 1.00 3N S ♣4 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
150 2.50 2.50 2N S +1 ♠7 11-Roddy-Ives vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
150 2.50 2.50 2N S +1 ♣8 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
100 0.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♣5 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 ♦2 10-Hartman-Howard vs 3-Matson-Ward
|
6 |
♠T953
♥J76432
♦A4
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠K74
♥QT85
♦KJ85
♣JT
|
♠AQ82
♥AK9
♦QT3
♣Q76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2/1♦ 2♥ 4NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣8 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
100 4.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♣8 10-Hartman-Howard vs 3-Matson-Ward
300 3.00 2.00 3♣* S -2 ♦5 11-Roddy-Ives vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣A 2-Moyer-Byrne vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣A 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣A 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
|
7 |
♠A93
♥Q
♦AQT763
♣Q32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠T2
♥AK9853
♦4
♣A987
|
♠Q876
♥T2
♦K952
♣JT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♥T 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ S ♥A 3-Matson-Ward vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
110 3.50 1.50 3♦ S ♥T 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ N ♥T 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♥T 11-Roddy-Ives vs 4-Vogt-Syversen
670 0.00 5.00 2♥* W ♣2 10-Hartman-Howard vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
|
8 |
♠AKJT82
♥J73
♦542
♣6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q3
♥AKQ2
♦AKJ9
♣KQ3
|
♠976
♥9854
♦Q83
♣T74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
530 5.00 0.00 3♠* N ♦3 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
50 3.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♠5 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
50 3.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♠5 3-Matson-Ward vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
50 3.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♠5 11-Roddy-Ives vs 4-Vogt-Syversen
140 1.00 4.00 3♥ E ♠5 10-Hartman-Howard vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
150 0.00 5.00 2N W +1 ♠A 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
|
9 |
♠J87
♥A6
♦AK9852
♣T5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠QT9643
♥T8
♦JT
♣K98
|
♠A2
♥KJ74
♦643
♣7632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠Q 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
460 4.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠6 11-Roddy-Ives vs 4-Vogt-Syversen
430 3.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠9 3-Matson-Ward vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
400 1.00 4.00 3N S ♠T 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
400 1.00 4.00 3N S ♠6 10-Hartman-Howard vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
400 1.00 4.00 3N S ♠6 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
|
10 |
♠QJT942
♥-
♦KQ65
♣643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠A
♥KQ87532
♦JT
♣K82
|
♠K763
♥A96
♦9432
♣75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 ♥A 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ W ♠Q 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 10-Hartman-Howard
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦K 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♣6 11-Roddy-Ives vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
930 1.00 4.00 3♥* W +1 ♠Q 3-Matson-Ward vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
990 0.00 5.00 4♥* W +1 ♠Q 9-Malkind-Malkind vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
|
11 |
♠543
♥963
♦T854
♣983
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠J
♥K42
♦KQJ2
♣JT762
|
♠AK9872
♥Q8
♦A76
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4/3♠ 4/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♦9 11-Roddy-Ives vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
170 4.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♦9 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 10-Hartman-Howard
170 4.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 9-Malkind-Malkind vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
200 1.50 3.50 2♠ E +3 ♦9 3-Matson-Ward vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
200 1.50 3.50 1♠ E +4 ♦9 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ E ♥A 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
|
12 |
♠KT742
♥4
♦A842
♣A64
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q85
♥AJ9763
♦-
♣J972
|
♠A6
♥KQT8
♦KQJ5
♣853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♠4 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♥4 3-Matson-Ward vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
50 3.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♣A 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 10-Hartman-Howard
140 2.00 3.00 3♥ W 9-Malkind-Malkind vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
420 0.50 4.50 4♥ W ♠4 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
420 0.50 4.50 4♥ W ♠4 11-Roddy-Ives vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
|
13 |
♠AT5
♥Q3
♦A82
♣QJ762
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠J742
♥752
♦53
♣KT53
|
♠K3
♥AT9
♦JT94
♣A984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦5 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 5-Pyrz-Nuccio
630 4.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♦J 10-Hartman-Howard vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠2 3-Matson-Ward vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
120 2.00 3.00 1N N +1 ♦J 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 ♦J 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 11-Roddy-Ives
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -1 ♦J 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
|
14 |
♠K76
♥T86
♦A543
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠AQ52
♥A3
♦K62
♣K962
|
♠JT984
♥742
♦QT
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♥K 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 5-Pyrz-Nuccio
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ S ♥A 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
140 3.50 1.50 3♥ S ♣2 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 11-Roddy-Ives
110 2.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥T 3-Matson-Ward vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
140 0.50 4.50 3♠ W ♠6 10-Hartman-Howard vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
140 0.50 4.50 3♠ E ♥K 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
|
15 |
♠A74
♥AKQ65
♦95
♣T64
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠QT9653
♥3
♦J
♣AQJ72
|
♠K
♥J42
♦KQT632
♣985
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♠4/5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♣ W -4 ♥A 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 11-Roddy-Ives
150 4.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 ♥A 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
140 2.50 2.50 3♥ N ♠K 12-Flaherty-Tatham vs 5-Pyrz-Nuccio
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +1 ♠K 10-Hartman-Howard vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ N ♦K 3-Matson-Ward vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ N -1 ♠K 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
|
16 |
♠KJ
♥A972
♦J84
♣Q976
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT764
♥KJ4
♦AKT2
♣J
|
♠Q8
♥T53
♦963
♣A8532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6/5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 5.00 0.00 1♠ W ♦J 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
110 4.00 1.00 2♠ W ♣6 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 10-Hartman-Howard
140 2.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♣7 7-Creamer-Dempsey vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
140 2.00 3.00 1♠ W +2 ♣6 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 11-Roddy-Ives
140 2.00 3.00 1♠ W +2 9-Malkind-Malkind vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
170 0.00 5.00 2♠ W +2 ♦J 3-Matson-Ward vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
|
17 |
♠KJ2
♥QJ76
♦QT2
♣A73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠86
♥AT95
♦KJ75
♣K96
|
♠QT94
♥83
♦A964
♣QJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♦4 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 11-Roddy-Ives
90 4.00 1.00 1N N ♠4 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
50 3.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♦4 7-Creamer-Dempsey vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
100 1.50 3.50 1N N -2 ♥8 3-Matson-Ward vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
100 1.50 3.50 2♠ S -2 ♦5 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 10-Hartman-Howard
300 0.00 5.00 2♠* S -2 ♥T 9-Malkind-Malkind vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
|
18 |
♠QJ6
♥K632
♦KQ53
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AT7
♥J954
♦92
♣9865
|
♠532
♥AQT8
♦A874
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 5.00 0.00 1♠ S ♦9 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 8-Simpson-Tucker
50 3.50 1.50 2♥ W -1 ♥2 9-Malkind-Malkind vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
50 3.50 1.50 1♦ E -1 ♥7 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 11-Roddy-Ives
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♠Q 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 10-Hartman-Howard
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♥2 3-Matson-Ward vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♦K 7-Creamer-Dempsey vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
|
19 |
♠AKJT5
♥7
♦AQ7
♣KJ92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q764
♥96
♦K65
♣Q854
|
♠9
♥KJ8532
♦JT82
♣T3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0/1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠0/1 NT0/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♦J 3-Matson-Ward vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
480 4.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♣T 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 11-Roddy-Ives
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♥5 6-Bishop-Bartley vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♦J 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 10-Hartman-Howard
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♦7 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
420 0.00 5.00 4♠ N ♥5 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
|
20 |
♠954
♥Q4
♦KQ983
♣K53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AQ862
♥AK7
♦J42
♣QJ
|
♠73
♥JT52
♦T65
♣9864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ -/1♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♥6/7 ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 2♥* E -2 ♦A 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
200 3.50 1.50 1N W -2 ♦8 3-Matson-Ward vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
200 3.50 1.50 1♠ W -2 ♦K 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
150 2.00 3.00 1N S +2 ♠4 6-Bishop-Bartley vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
110 1.00 4.00 3♦ N ♠7 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 11-Roddy-Ives
90 0.00 5.00 1N W ♦K 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 10-Hartman-Howard
|
21 |
♠AJ876
♥QJ6
♦T52
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠94
♥843
♦K64
♣A9762
|
♠KT32
♥AK2
♦Q93
♣T83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3♣ E -2 ♥T 3-Matson-Ward vs 2-Moyer-Byrne
100 4.50 0.50 3♣ E -2 ♥T 6-Bishop-Bartley vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
50 3.00 2.00 3♣ E -1 ♥T 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 11-Roddy-Ives
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 7-Creamer-Dempsey
90 1.00 4.00 2♣ E ♥T 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 10-Hartman-Howard
300 0.00 5.00 3♦ S -3 ♠9 1-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
|
22 |
♠A984
♥-
♦KJT65432
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠K63
♥KQT8
♦7
♣KQJ83
|
♠52
♥AJ7532
♦-
♣AT542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 4♠ ♣1 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 4/6♣ 5♥ ♦1 ♠0/2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 5.00 0.00 5♥ S +1 ♠Q 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 1-Zeldin-Kunkel
100 3.50 1.50 6♥ E -1 ♠Q 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
100 3.50 1.50 5♥ E -1 ♦A 2-Moyer-Byrne vs 11-Roddy-Ives
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠Q 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
650 1.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♥3 3-Matson-Ward vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
1430 0.00 5.00 6♥ E ♦A 7-Creamer-Dempsey vs 10-Hartman-Howard
|
23 |
♠K6
♥JT87
♦542
♣9876
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠974
♥K53
♦AJ6
♣AQJ2
|
♠J52
♥AQ4
♦KQ9
♣K543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥J 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 1-Zeldin-Kunkel
630 2.00 3.00 4N W ♥J 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥J 2-Moyer-Byrne vs 11-Roddy-Ives
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥J 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♥7 7-Creamer-Dempsey vs 10-Hartman-Howard
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♣9 3-Matson-Ward vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
|
24 |
♠Q
♥QT9874
♦AK93
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AJT875
♥A62
♦T4
♣K4
|
♠K63
♥J5
♦852
♣AQT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ N +2 8-Simpson-Tucker vs 1-Zeldin-Kunkel
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦A 2-Moyer-Byrne vs 11-Roddy-Ives
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦A 3-Matson-Ward vs 12-Flaherty-Tatham
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦A 4-Vogt-Syversen vs 6-Bishop-Bartley
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦A 5-Pyrz-Nuccio vs 9-Malkind-Malkind
450 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦A 7-Creamer-Dempsey vs 10-Hartman-Howard
|