Hands and Results
1 |
♠AJ6
♥9864
♦J73
♣873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠Q3
♥KJ75
♦2
♣A96542
|
♠T9854
♥AT
♦KQT96
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♥4 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
50 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♣T 10-Hall-Andrews vs 8-Johnson-Brager
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
110 1.50 2.50 1♠ E +1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♠3 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
2 |
♠A9865
♥4
♦KQ32
♣Q98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠-
♥QT98632
♦A954
♣A7
|
♠J73
♥K7
♦T76
♣KJT43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥1/3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥K 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ N +3 4-Anderson-Fields vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
100 1.50 2.50 5♠ N -1 ♥K 10-Hall-Andrews vs 8-Johnson-Brager
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♥2 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♦K 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
|
3 |
♠JT972
♥-
♦K82
♣AT872
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠A83
♥KQ95
♦AJ7
♣Q54
|
♠K6
♥AJ842
♦Q643
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: -/1♣ 4/5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♠J 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠4 10-Hall-Andrews vs 8-Johnson-Brager
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♣7 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
|
4 |
♠94
♥AT875
♦AK7
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠652
♥9432
♦843
♣QT3
|
♠AQJT83
♥K6
♦T2
♣K74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S ♠6 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ N +2 ♠A 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
200 2.50 1.50 2♥ N +3 ♦T 8-Johnson-Brager vs 4-Anderson-Fields
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 ♥Q 10-Hall-Andrews vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ S -1 ♠6 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
5 |
♠K
♥AT5
♦AK98654
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠QT73
♥QJ742
♦73
♣T2
|
♠J85
♥K96
♦JT2
♣8543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 2♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 4.00 0.00 6N N +1 ♦J 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
720 2.50 1.50 3N N +4 ♣8 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
720 2.50 1.50 3N N +4 ♣8 8-Johnson-Brager vs 4-Anderson-Fields
170 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +3 ♦2 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
200 0.00 4.00 6♠ S -2 ♥Q 10-Hall-Andrews vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
|
6 |
♠98
♥AJ642
♦KQJ2
♣T4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQ532
♥83
♦T98
♣Q96
|
♠T764
♥Q97
♦54
♣AJ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 5♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠3 10-Hall-Andrews vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠K 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 8-Johnson-Brager vs 4-Anderson-Fields
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♠3 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♦T 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
7 |
♠K9764
♥J98762
♦8
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AT52
♥4
♦JT6
♣KQJT8
|
♠QJ8
♥AQT
♦Q43
♣9642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -4 ♦3 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦8 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♣T 10-Hall-Andrews vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 8-Johnson-Brager vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
100 0.50 3.50 2♦ S -1 ♥4 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 4-Anderson-Fields
|
8 |
♠J54
♥7642
♦98
♣K964
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AQ2
♥9853
♦A7652
♣8
|
♠T873
♥A
♦JT4
♣AQJT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5/6 ♠2/3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♣ E ♥K 10-Hall-Andrews vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ W +2 ♥7 8-Johnson-Brager vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥K 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 4-Anderson-Fields
150 1.00 3.00 2♦ W +3 ♥7 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
210 0.00 4.00 1N W +4 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
9 |
♠8652
♥3
♦A9876
♣A84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠A7
♥AKQJT95
♦3
♣T75
|
♠JT9
♥874
♦KQ5
♣9632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♥ W -1 ♦A 10-Hall-Andrews vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -2 ♦3 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
300 2.00 2.00 5♦* S -2 ♥A 8-Johnson-Brager vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
500 1.00 3.00 5♠* S -3 ♥A 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 4-Anderson-Fields
800 0.00 4.00 5♦* S -4 ♥A 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
10 |
♠QJ43
♥K65
♦J3
♣AK52
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠-
♥98743
♦AT8764
♣J6
|
♠K7652
♥A
♦92
♣QT743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 5NT ♣6 ♦5 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 4.00 0.00 4♦* W -4 ♣A 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
300 3.00 1.00 5♦ W -3 ♣A 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S 10-Hall-Andrews vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
200 1.00 3.00 4♠* N -1 ♥A 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 4-Anderson-Fields
800 0.00 4.00 4♠* S -3 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 8-Johnson-Brager
|
11 |
♠KQJT642
♥AK5
♦K9
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠-
♥J743
♦AT76
♣AJ953
|
♠753
♥QT92
♦85
♣K842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♦8 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 4-Anderson-Fields
480 3.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 8-Johnson-Brager
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥2 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥2 10-Hall-Andrews vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ N ♣2 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
12 |
♠Q54
♥K7
♦JT87
♣KQJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT962
♥9532
♦96
♣A5
|
♠J73
♥T864
♦A54
♣742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 4N S +1 ♥9 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥4 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 4-Anderson-Fields
600 2.00 2.00 5♦ N 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 8-Johnson-Brager
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♠T 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♠6 10-Hall-Andrews vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
|
13 |
♠AK85
♥J5
♦K7
♣KQJ62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠96
♥T6
♦AJ986
♣A843
|
♠T32
♥83
♦T432
♣T975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥1 ♠1/0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.00 0.00 6♠ S 4-Anderson-Fields vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
680 2.00 2.00 5♠ N +1 ♠2 10-Hall-Andrews vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
680 2.00 2.00 4♠ N +2 ♦4 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
680 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♠9 8-Johnson-Brager vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
200 0.00 4.00 6N* N -1 ♥3 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
|
14 |
♠Q3
♥975
♦9865
♣AKQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠J86
♥AT86432
♦T7
♣5
|
♠742
♥KQ
♦AQJ3
♣9864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -2 ♠Q 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 ♠Q 10-Hall-Andrews vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
50 2.50 1.50 3♥ W -1 ♣A 8-Johnson-Brager vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 ♣A 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ W +1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
15 |
♠AK763
♥Q73
♦Q83
♣QT
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠2
♥82
♦AT964
♣K8642
|
♠Q9854
♥AK95
♦K2
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ -/1NT NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♦4 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 ♠J 10-Hall-Andrews vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E 4-Anderson-Fields vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
300 1.00 3.00 1♠ N -3 ♥A 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
800 0.00 4.00 2♠* N -3 ♥A 8-Johnson-Brager vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
16 |
♠JT972
♥AQ7
♦K2
♣T54
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q
♥T98532
♦AQ7653
♣-
|
♠K843
♥4
♦JT98
♣8632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♥ 4/5♠ 5NT ♦3 |
EW: 4♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 4.00 0.00 3N S +4 ♦6 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥4 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥4 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 8-Johnson-Brager
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
400 0.00 4.00 5♣ S ♦A 10-Hall-Andrews vs 4-Anderson-Fields
|
17 |
♠K95
♥Q65
♦AQJT2
♣43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AQ8
♥T972
♦84
♣QJT9
|
♠T76432
♥K43
♦K6
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♠7 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ N 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♠4 10-Hall-Andrews vs 4-Anderson-Fields
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♣Q 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♦3 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 8-Johnson-Brager
|
18 |
♠T74
♥AT9654
♦865
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠J63
♥J
♦KJT7
♣QT953
|
♠982
♥KQ83
♦A93
♣K74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5/6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 1♥* E -2 ♠A 9-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -3 ♠T 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♣7 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♣T 10-Hall-Andrews vs 4-Anderson-Fields
200 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -2 ♣3 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 8-Johnson-Brager
|
19 |
♠AK85
♥6
♦J92
♣AKT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠T42
♥Q9852
♦3
♣5432
|
♠7
♥AJ3
♦AKT854
♣Q76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♥7/6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦3 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦3 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦3 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Johnson-Brager
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦3 10-Hall-Andrews vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
|
20 |
♠AKQ
♥AT42
♦AT7
♣AK9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠J953
♥Q975
♦K2
♣764
|
♠T6
♥K86
♦843
♣QJ852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♣Q 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Johnson-Brager
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♣5 10-Hall-Andrews vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 4-Anderson-Fields vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
630 1.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♣5 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
90 0.00 4.00 2♣ N ♠T 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
|
21 |
♠T75
♥K95
♦T7
♣QT942
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AJ86
♥J32
♦K862
♣85
|
♠Q9
♥AT874
♦AJ
♣KJ63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ E ♦4 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Johnson-Brager
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ W +1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♣A 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦5 1-Schoensee-Garcia vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♦4 10-Hall-Andrews vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
22 |
♠K83
♥T873
♦872
♣AKT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠972
♥J9654
♦543
♣Q7
|
♠AJ65
♥Q
♦QJT96
♣952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥5 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥4 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
430 1.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♦4 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 8-Johnson-Brager
430 1.50 2.50 3N S +1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
400 0.00 4.00 3N S ♥5 10-Hall-Andrews vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
23 |
♠T98
♥7
♦96
♣JT98743
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJ4
♥AQ5
♦Q872
♣K6
|
♠-
♥T98632
♦AT543
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♠7 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♣Q 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 8-Johnson-Brager
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♠5 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
1430 0.00 4.00 6♥ E ♠2 10-Hall-Andrews vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
24 |
♠K95
♥K
♦KQ92
♣T8743
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠QT863
♥97
♦JT76
♣A6
|
♠A4
♥QJT8643
♦A4
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: -/1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠Q 2-Boyer-Wetz vs 8-Johnson-Brager
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♣2 7-Kanekar-Locke vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 4-Anderson-Fields vs 3-Davidson-Bennett
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♣2 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦5 10-Hall-Andrews vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
25 |
♠2
♥QJT8542
♦82
♣J32
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q965
♥K6
♦QJ754
♣Q9
|
♠JT84
♥A93
♦AK3
♣T64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦A 8-Johnson-Brager vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦A 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦A 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦A 10-Hall-Andrews vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♦A 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Anderson-Fields
|
26 |
♠-
♥KJ976
♦KQ986
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠T7653
♥3
♦543
♣AT43
|
♠AJ82
♥A8542
♦AJT7
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 1♥ E -3 ♣J 8-Johnson-Brager vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦K 10-Hall-Andrews vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
100 2.50 1.50 1♥ E -1 ♦3 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
80 1.00 3.00 1♥ E ♣7 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Anderson-Fields
500 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 ♥3 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
|
27 |
♠985
♥Q
♦A864
♣JT873
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠K
♥AT83
♦QJ93
♣A962
|
♠QJ73
♥K964
♦T52
♣Q5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 3/2♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♥* E -2 ♠A 3-Davidson-Bennett vs 9-Van Hemert-Zissen
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♥A 10-Hall-Andrews vs 7-Kanekar-Locke
140 2.50 1.50 3♠ S ♦Q 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Boyer-Wetz
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♦Q 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Anderson-Fields
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E ♠A 8-Johnson-Brager vs 1-Schoensee-Garcia
|