Hands and Results
1 |
♠QT9432
♥J
♦742
♣652
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠KJ
♥962
♦AK86
♣AT84
|
♠A65
♥543
♦QJT5
♣J97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.93 0.07 3-Patel-Patel vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
110 5.21 1.79 6-Lane-Smith vs 2-Mogck-Bache
110 5.21 1.79 7-DeKock-Rose vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
100 3.50 3.50 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
50 1.79 5.21 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
50 1.79 5.21 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 9-Richard-Morris
120 0.07 6.93 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
|
2 |
♠AKQ
♥J5
♦Q72
♣KJ532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠5
♥A9843
♦KJ83
♣A84
|
♠J9843
♥K76
♦964
♣QT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ -/1♠ ♣5 ♠6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.93 0.07 3-Patel-Patel vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
100 5.79 1.21 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
90 4.64 2.36 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
50 3.50 3.50 7-DeKock-Rose vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
110 2.36 4.64 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 9-Richard-Morris
140 1.21 5.79 6-Lane-Smith vs 2-Mogck-Bache
200 0.07 6.93 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
|
3 |
♠962
♥AKQ62
♦KJ8
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AQJT5
♥874
♦A4
♣Q73
|
♠73
♥J
♦T9652
♣AJT64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4/5 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.93 0.07 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
110 5.21 1.79 4-Havens-Vance vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
110 5.21 1.79 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
100 3.50 3.50 6-Lane-Smith vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
50 1.21 5.79 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 9-Richard-Morris
50 1.21 5.79 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 2-Mogck-Bache
50 1.21 5.79 7-DeKock-Rose vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
|
4 |
♠-
♥AKQ9654
♦Q8753
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠42
♥7
♦KJT942
♣Q732
|
♠AQT987
♥T
♦6
♣AT854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 2NT ♣3 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 6.93 0.07 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 9-Richard-Morris
680 5.79 1.21 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
650 2.93 4.07 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 2-Mogck-Bache
650 2.93 4.07 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
650 2.93 4.07 6-Lane-Smith vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
650 2.93 4.07 7-DeKock-Rose vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
200 0.07 6.93 4-Havens-Vance vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
|
5 |
♠Q865
♥AKJ543
♦85
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠J3
♥T9762
♦A963
♣97
|
♠KT97
♥-
♦T742
♣KJ654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1/-♦ 5/4♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣7/6 ♦7/5 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 6.93 0.07 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
620 5.79 1.21 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
200 4.64 2.36 3-Patel-Patel vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
170 2.93 4.07 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
170 2.93 4.07 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
100 1.21 5.79 7-DeKock-Rose vs 2-Mogck-Bache
200 0.07 6.93 6-Lane-Smith vs 9-Richard-Morris
|
6 |
♠-
♥AQ83
♦AKJ865
♣AT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQJ
♥KJ
♦Q93
♣J9763
|
♠AT87643
♥T7
♦4
♣KQ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♠ -/2NT ♦1/2 ♥0/1 NT1/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.83 0.17 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
200 4.83 2.17 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
200 4.83 2.17 3-Patel-Patel vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
100 1.50 5.50 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
100 1.50 5.50 7-DeKock-Rose vs 2-Mogck-Bache
100 1.50 5.50 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
|
7 |
♠J54
♥K98
♦8632
♣A63
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AT2
♥Q63
♦K954
♣J94
|
♠98763
♥T72
♦Q7
♣872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 6.36 0.64 3-Patel-Patel vs 2-Mogck-Bache
630 6.36 0.64 6-Lane-Smith vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
600 3.50 3.50 4-Havens-Vance vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
600 3.50 3.50 7-DeKock-Rose vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
600 3.50 3.50 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
210 1.21 5.79 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
170 0.07 6.93 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 9-Richard-Morris
|
8 |
♠A52
♥Q4
♦Q9842
♣A65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠K3
♥A87
♦JT73
♣QJT4
|
♠JT9874
♥J95
♦K
♣873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.93 0.07 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 9-Richard-Morris
110 5.21 1.79 7-DeKock-Rose vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
110 5.21 1.79 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
90 3.50 3.50 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
80 2.36 4.64 4-Havens-Vance vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
100 0.64 6.36 3-Patel-Patel vs 2-Mogck-Bache
100 0.64 6.36 6-Lane-Smith vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
|
9 |
♠AT54
♥J87
♦KQ7
♣AK3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q8762
♥6
♦A5
♣Q9762
|
♠KJ9
♥AK32
♦84
♣J854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣3 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 7.00 0.00 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 2-Mogck-Bache
400 6.00 1.00 3-Patel-Patel vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
380 5.00 2.00 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
140 3.50 3.50 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
140 3.50 3.50 7-DeKock-Rose vs 9-Richard-Morris
50 1.50 5.50 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
50 1.50 5.50 4-Havens-Vance vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
100 0.00 7.00 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
|
10 |
♠AQT43
♥7
♦AJ75
♣A98
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠J
♥AQT6
♦98
♣JT7542
|
♠K96
♥KJ9432
♦Q
♣K63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 7.00 0.00 3-Patel-Patel vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
500 6.00 1.00 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
170 5.00 2.00 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
140 3.50 3.50 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
140 3.50 3.50 7-DeKock-Rose vs 9-Richard-Morris
200 2.00 5.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
620 0.50 6.50 4-Havens-Vance vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
620 0.50 6.50 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 2-Mogck-Bache
|
11 |
♠T8
♥982
♦962
♣T8654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AK9742
♥KJ6
♦T3
♣AQ
|
♠J6
♥Q7543
♦AKJ87
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.93 0.07 3-Patel-Patel vs 9-Richard-Morris
430 5.79 1.21 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
450 4.64 2.36 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
480 1.79 5.21 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
480 1.79 5.21 4-Havens-Vance vs 2-Mogck-Bache
480 1.79 5.21 6-Lane-Smith vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
480 1.79 5.21 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
|
12 |
♠4
♥AJ32
♦T976
♣JT62
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠AK65
♥K96
♦AQ84
♣Q4
|
♠QJT32
♥T84
♦32
♣973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.83 0.17 3-Patel-Patel vs 9-Richard-Morris
100 5.50 1.50 4-Havens-Vance vs 2-Mogck-Bache
50 4.17 2.83 6-Lane-Smith vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
70 2.17 4.83 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
70 2.17 4.83 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
140 0.17 6.83 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
|
13 |
♠KT6
♥2
♦QJT72
♣J854
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠Q42
♥QJT74
♦K63
♣A6
|
♠85
♥AK93
♦A94
♣T732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.36 0.64 3-Patel-Patel vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
100 6.36 0.64 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 2-Mogck-Bache
100 4.64 2.36 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
140 2.93 4.07 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
140 2.93 4.07 6-Lane-Smith vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
170 1.21 5.79 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
200 0.07 6.93 4-Havens-Vance vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
|
14 |
♠KJ6
♥A9763
♦T85
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠AT2
♥54
♦Q762
♣Q832
|
♠5
♥Q8
♦AKJ94
♣AJT65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.36 0.64 4-Havens-Vance vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
170 6.36 0.64 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
140 4.64 2.36 3-Patel-Patel vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
50 3.50 3.50 6-Lane-Smith vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
110 2.36 4.64 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
150 1.21 5.79 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 2-Mogck-Bache
170 0.07 6.93 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
|
15 |
♠A87
♥AJ92
♦976
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠52
♥K
♦A5
♣KT976432
|
♠KQT4
♥Q87543
♦QJ
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ 3/2NT ♣4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♥ ♦4 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.93 0.07 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
140 5.79 1.21 6-Lane-Smith vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
100 4.64 2.36 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
50 3.50 3.50 4-Havens-Vance vs 9-Richard-Morris
110 1.79 5.21 7-DeKock-Rose vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
110 1.79 5.21 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
200 0.07 6.93 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 2-Mogck-Bache
|
16 |
♠AK5
♥J32
♦K975
♣AQ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠J642
♥Q75
♦AJ6
♣T63
|
♠T87
♥T964
♦Q84
♣984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 4/5♦ 4♥ 3/4♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.64 2.36 4-Havens-Vance vs 9-Richard-Morris
430 4.64 2.36 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 2-Mogck-Bache
430 4.64 2.36 6-Lane-Smith vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
430 4.64 2.36 7-DeKock-Rose vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
430 4.64 2.36 8-Weinberg-Weien vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
400 1.21 5.79 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
210 0.07 6.93 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
|
17 |
♠A42
♥T732
♦QT732
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠65
♥8654
♦A864
♣862
|
♠Q97
♥AQ
♦KJ9
♣KQT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.93 0.07 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
140 4.07 2.93 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
140 4.07 2.93 3-Patel-Patel vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
140 4.07 2.93 6-Lane-Smith vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
140 4.07 2.93 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 9-Richard-Morris
100 1.21 5.79 7-DeKock-Rose vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
50 0.07 6.93 4-Havens-Vance vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
|
18 |
♠954
♥T98
♦8
♣AJT874
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKT8
♥J5
♦KJT2
♣K32
|
♠J62
♥AKQ76
♦Q763
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.93 0.07 2-Johnson-Hunt vs 4-Elphick-Wolf
100 5.79 1.21 9-Simonds-Sherman vs 9-Richard-Morris
170 4.64 2.36 5-Harwood-Anderson vs 1-Sandstrom-Mackay
400 2.93 4.07 4-Havens-Vance vs 8-Nappi-San-Wong
400 2.93 4.07 7-DeKock-Rose vs 5-Halbach-Gozesky
420 1.21 5.79 3-Patel-Patel vs 6-Edney-Stephenson
450 0.07 6.93 6-Lane-Smith vs 3-Brady-Kubasch
|