Hands and Results
1 |
♠9652
♥A7543
♦A93
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AT3
♥JT8
♦Q652
♣K52
|
♠KQJ7
♥962
♦K87
♣A83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♠ E -2 ♣Q 6-Fields-Howard vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
50 1.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♥4 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
50 1.50 1.50 2N W -1 ♣9 7-Mezin-Chan vs 3-Haines-Abrams
90 0.00 3.00 1N E ♥K 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Rake-Locke
|
2 |
♠QJT864
♥7
♦53
♣KQT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠K75
♥A942
♦A72
♣A93
|
♠A
♥QJT85
♦QT84
♣862
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N W +1 ♠Q 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Rake-Locke
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ E +1 ♠8 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ W ♦5 6-Fields-Howard vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
420 0.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠2 7-Mezin-Chan vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
3 |
♠AQT6
♥95
♦AKJ
♣K764
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠92
♥AKJ84
♦QT5
♣852
|
♠J84
♥32
♦7643
♣AQ93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -4 ♦A 6-Fields-Howard vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
150 2.00 1.00 1N N +2 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Rake-Locke
120 0.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♠3 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
120 0.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♣4 7-Mezin-Chan vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
4 |
♠7
♥KJ96
♦8753
♣A643
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠J95
♥A432
♦Q62
♣K72
|
♠T64
♥Q7
♦AKT94
♣Q95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1/2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ S ♠5 6-Fields-Howard vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Rake-Locke
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S ♦2 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
90 0.00 3.00 1N N ♦9 7-Mezin-Chan vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
5 |
♠K6
♥AT7
♦A8765
♣943
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠J9753
♥KQ654
♦T4
♣2
|
♠A84
♥J9
♦Q
♣KQT8765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 3.00 0.00 3♦* N ♣T 7-Mezin-Chan vs 6-Fields-Howard
150 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 ♦K 1-Rake-Locke vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
130 1.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 ♠8 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♣K 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
6 |
♠J542
♥A876
♦64
♣KT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKT
♥5
♦QJ973
♣Q876
|
♠Q7
♥J432
♦AT52
♣542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♣2 7-Mezin-Chan vs 6-Fields-Howard
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥5 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 3-Haines-Abrams
50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 1-Rake-Locke vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
7 |
♠KJ7653
♥J85
♦AJ9
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A842
♥AQ4
♦76
♣AT63
|
♠-
♥73
♦T8542
♣Q98742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 NT4/5 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♣7 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 3-Haines-Abrams
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♣5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 1-Rake-Locke vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
200 0.00 3.00 4♠* N -1 7-Mezin-Chan vs 6-Fields-Howard
|
8 |
♠32
♥AJ95
♦J654
♣A83
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AKT8764
♥Q8
♦983
♣J
|
♠J95
♥K74
♦AQ2
♣KQ92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦4 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 3-Haines-Abrams
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦2 7-Mezin-Chan vs 6-Fields-Howard
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ W 1-Rake-Locke vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
9 |
♠T964
♥4
♦A872
♣KQT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠A73
♥73
♦KQ93
♣J543
|
♠J852
♥KJ86
♦5
♣A972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N 1-Rake-Locke vs 7-Mezin-Chan
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -1 ♦3 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
50 1.50 1.50 4♦ S -1 ♦K 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Haines-Abrams
100 0.00 3.00 4♦ S -2 ♣3 6-Fields-Howard vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
10 |
♠A2
♥A5
♦KQ76543
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠JT
♥8742
♦AT8
♣K984
|
♠KQ875
♥KJ93
♦-
♣A765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ E +1 ♦2 6-Fields-Howard vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ E +1 1-Rake-Locke vs 7-Mezin-Chan
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ E +2 ♦2 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
200 0.00 3.00 4♦ N -2 ♠K 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
11 |
♠A74
♥AJT965
♦2
♣K87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠KQ96
♥4
♦J863
♣QJT6
|
♠JT8
♥K3
♦AKQT95
♣95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♦* E -1 6-Fields-Howard vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
50 1.00 2.00 5♦ E -1 1-Rake-Locke vs 7-Mezin-Chan
50 1.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♥7 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
50 1.00 2.00 4♦ E -1 ♥2 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
12 |
♠AK43
♥8764
♦JT9
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠JT92
♥T2
♦8742
♣Q74
|
♠876
♥Q93
♦AK5
♣AT53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♥ S ♦4 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♣4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Haines-Abrams
50 1.00 2.00 1♣ E -1 ♥A 6-Fields-Howard vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 1-Rake-Locke vs 7-Mezin-Chan
|
13 |
♠J97
♥AKJ
♦AKT54
♣K3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠QT84
♥Q75
♦2
♣AQJT7
|
♠K5
♥962
♦QJ73
♣9542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥4/5 ♠5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♣* W -1 ♥K 7-Mezin-Chan vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
150 2.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♦Q 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
130 1.00 2.00 2♦ N +2 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 1-Rake-Locke
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♦2 3-Haines-Abrams vs 6-Fields-Howard
|
14 |
♠97
♥AJ643
♦AJT9
♣A2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠T8432
♥Q8
♦64
♣KT53
|
♠AQJ5
♥5
♦Q752
♣8764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2/1 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♠8 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
480 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♥5 3-Haines-Abrams vs 6-Fields-Howard
480 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♦5 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 1-Rake-Locke
450 0.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♠4 7-Mezin-Chan vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
15 |
♠AT963
♥Q
♦A2
♣QJ862
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠K4
♥K9842
♦QJ5
♣K53
|
♠Q85
♥AJ753
♦743
♣A7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♣Q 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣Q 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 1-Rake-Locke
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣Q 3-Haines-Abrams vs 6-Fields-Howard
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣Q 7-Mezin-Chan vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
16 |
♠KJT7
♥J3
♦AK98
♣T97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠43
♥A98542
♦T2
♣AJ5
|
♠A962
♥Q7
♦QJ43
♣Q42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1/-NT ♦6 ♥5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♥5 7-Mezin-Chan vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
90 2.00 1.00 1N S ♥5 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 1-Rake-Locke
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♣T 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -3 ♥Q 3-Haines-Abrams vs 6-Fields-Howard
|
17 |
♠AQJ7
♥4
♦A9653
♣AT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠T8542
♥KJ985
♦Q
♣93
|
♠963
♥6
♦K872
♣J8764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♣3 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Mezin-Chan
460 2.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♣6 1-Rake-Locke vs 6-Fields-Howard
430 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♣6 3-Haines-Abrams vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
100 0.00 3.00 4♥* S -1 ♣9 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
18 |
♠AT32
♥-
♦Q763
♣J8742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠986
♥J4
♦KJ54
♣QT63
|
♠KQ74
♥AKQT962
♦-
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠4/3 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♥ 3♠ 4/5NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♥8 1-Rake-Locke vs 6-Fields-Howard
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ E ♣5 3-Haines-Abrams vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
980 0.50 2.50 6♥ E ♦A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
980 0.50 2.50 6♥ E ♣9 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Mezin-Chan
|
19 |
♠QJ432
♥KJT4
♦76
♣Q7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠986
♥A95
♦AK93
♣T62
|
♠K7
♥Q8763
♦842
♣K98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5/4 ♦5/4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♥6 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +2 ♦2 3-Haines-Abrams vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♦2 1-Rake-Locke vs 6-Fields-Howard
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ N ♥6 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Mezin-Chan
|
20 |
♠4
♥KT84
♦QT95
♣9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJT83
♥AJ763
♦K
♣T
|
♠K92
♥9
♦AJ873
♣QJ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠0 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 6♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 6♠ W -2 ♣9 3-Haines-Abrams vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
710 2.00 1.00 4♠ W +3 ♦5 1-Rake-Locke vs 6-Fields-Howard
1430 1.00 2.00 6♠ W ♠4 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Mezin-Chan
1460 0.00 3.00 6♠ W +1 ♦5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Gilliam-Tatham
|
21 |
♠82
♥64
♦KJ2
♣T87543
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AJ9743
♥KQ75
♦-
♣AQJ
|
♠65
♥T32
♦QT8765
♣62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 4♠* W -3 ♦K 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 7-Mezin-Chan
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦3 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Haines-Abrams
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ W ♣8 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Rake-Locke
1400 0.00 3.00 3N* S -5 ♠7 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Fields-Howard
|
22 |
♠A
♥AJ643
♦QT7643
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KT94
♥982
♦K
♣AKT98
|
♠Q832
♥KQ
♦AJ85
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦4 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 7-Mezin-Chan
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ W ♣3 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Haines-Abrams
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♣3 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Rake-Locke
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣3 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Fields-Howard
|
23 |
♠A7
♥AQT7
♦A7532
♣K3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠JT8
♥J9642
♦QT6
♣AQ
|
♠Q9642
♥K85
♦4
♣9754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♦4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Fields-Howard
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ N ♠4 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 7-Mezin-Chan
100 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♠4 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Rake-Locke
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♠4 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Haines-Abrams
|
24 |
♠QJ5
♥A98
♦QT
♣A9852
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠742
♥63
♦KJ8642
♣K3
|
♠863
♥KT54
♦53
♣JT64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦4 2-Bishop-Bartley vs 7-Mezin-Chan
460 2.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦4 4-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Haines-Abrams
430 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥4 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 1-Rake-Locke
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♦5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Fields-Howard
|
25 |
♠AQT9
♥QJ87
♦QT2
♣JT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠J85
♥AK5
♦763
♣7653
|
♠K3
♥92
♦AKJ954
♣984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 ♣7 6-Fields-Howard vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
140 2.50 0.50 2♥ S +1 3-Haines-Abrams vs 1-Rake-Locke
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ S ♣7 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ E ♣A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Mezin-Chan
|
26 |
♠K985
♥Q632
♦865
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AQ32
♥T4
♦QT3
♣AK75
|
♠J4
♥J87
♦KJ94
♣QT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N E ♥5 3-Haines-Abrams vs 1-Rake-Locke
120 2.00 1.00 2N W ♠5 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 0.50 2.50 2N W +1 ♠5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Mezin-Chan
150 0.50 2.50 1N W +2 ♠5 6-Fields-Howard vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
|
27 |
♠A985
♥8
♦KT53
♣J654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠J76432
♥A974
♦4
♣AT
|
♠KT
♥5
♦AJ872
♣Q9832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ -/1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠3/4 NT6/7 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♦4 3-Haines-Abrams vs 1-Rake-Locke
150 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 ♥8 6-Fields-Howard vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♥8 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♦4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Mezin-Chan
|
28 |
♠Q9
♥K94
♦AJ75
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT732
♥A2
♦T862
♣A3
|
♠AJ6
♥QJT75
♦K43
♣K9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣T 3-Haines-Abrams vs 1-Rake-Locke
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣8 5-Gilliam-Tatham vs 4-Huffaker-Huffaker
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 6-Fields-Howard vs 2-Bishop-Bartley
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 7-Mezin-Chan
|