Hands and Results
1 |
♠Q942
♥K5
♦T654
♣972
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AJ75
♥Q82
♦KQ32
♣A4
|
♠K83
♥943
♦AJ8
♣KJT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥6 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Miller-Talbott
430 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠2 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 1-Appel-Robins
460 0.00 2.00 3N E +2 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
2 |
♠KT75
♥KQ
♦AQ74
♣J62
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠62
♥T94
♦T9853
♣A74
|
♠AJ8
♥J76532
♦2
♣K93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N N ♠8 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Miller-Talbott
100 1.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♦2 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 1-Appel-Robins
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♦6 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
3 |
♠52
♥Q74
♦AQJ62
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠73
♥KJ52
♦T753
♣A92
|
♠J864
♥863
♦K84
♣JT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3/4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥2 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 1-Appel-Robins
120 1.00 1.00 2N N ♣J 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Miller-Talbott
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥2 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
4 |
♠Q95
♥KJ762
♦KQ3
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AKJ83
♥Q8
♦AJ95
♣Q9
|
♠T64
♥A954
♦82
♣KT42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1/2♥ 3/4♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♦K 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Miller-Talbott
170 1.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♣J 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 1-Appel-Robins
620 0.00 2.00 4♠ W 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
5 |
♠JT2
♥Q6542
♦Q82
♣42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠K864
♥J8
♦T73
♣Q973
|
♠75
♥AK
♦KJ654
♣AJ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 1N E -1 ♠3 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 1-Appel-Robins
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♠7 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
500 0.00 2.00 2♣ S -5 ♥J 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Miller-Talbott
|
6 |
♠Q52
♥98
♦QJ93
♣AK82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠JT8
♥KJT4
♦86542
♣9
|
♠A63
♥Q3
♦K
♣QT76543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣6 1-Appel-Robins vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
50 0.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♥4 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 2-Miller-Talbott
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♣9 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
7 |
♠53
♥JT9852
♦KT2
♣97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠QJT4
♥6
♦A65
♣QJT84
|
♠72
♥K74
♦J73
♣AK632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 5♣* W -1 ♠5 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 2-Miller-Talbott
140 1.00 1.00 1♠ S +2 ♥6 1-Appel-Robins vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
100 0.00 2.00 1♠ S -1 ♣Q 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
8 |
♠AKQJ7
♥K3
♦543
♣A97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠83
♥Q754
♦KT2
♣QJ43
|
♠9654
♥A2
♦A976
♣T82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♣3 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 2-Miller-Talbott
120 1.00 1.00 2N S ♣3 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♦6 1-Appel-Robins vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
|
9 |
♠KJ9
♥K7632
♦JT6
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠76
♥AT94
♦A8754
♣T8
|
♠AQ8
♥5
♦K92
♣AJ7432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♠ S -2 ♣T 1-Appel-Robins vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ E +2 ♠T 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 2-Miller-Talbott
150 0.00 2.00 2♣ E +3 ♠2 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
10 |
♠J52
♥K754
♦J986
♣64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠A964
♥AQJT8
♦32
♣95
|
♠T873
♥93
♦KQ7
♣AQJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♥6 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 2-Miller-Talbott
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♣3 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
100 0.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♥6 1-Appel-Robins vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
|
11 |
♠A
♥QT6
♦T974
♣AJ963
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠K7
♥AJ9
♦KQJ3
♣KQ84
|
♠QJT432
♥42
♦A8
♣T75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ 3/4NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣2 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
50 1.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥T 2-Miller-Talbott vs 1-Appel-Robins
450 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦T 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
12 |
♠Q92
♥JT2
♦832
♣Q965
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠K653
♥85
♦AJ74
♣KT7
|
♠A74
♥K643
♦QT96
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 4/3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 2♦ E +2 ♠J 2-Miller-Talbott vs 1-Appel-Robins
140 1.00 1.00 1♠ W +2 ♥J 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
400 0.00 2.00 3N E ♥7 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
|
13 |
♠86
♥AKQT86542
♦6
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠975
♥J93
♦K9853
♣JT
|
♠AKJ3
♥7
♦AQ
♣KQ8764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 4/-NT ♥3 NT10/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 2.00 0.00 4♥* N ♠A 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
620 1.00 1.00 4♥ N ♣7 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
200 0.00 2.00 5♥* N -1 ♦A 2-Miller-Talbott vs 1-Appel-Robins
|
14 |
♠JT742
♥K
♦KQJ4
♣875
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠965
♥Q87
♦98752
♣K2
|
♠Q8
♥96542
♦T6
♣QJT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.00 0.00 6♠ S ♦7 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
520 0.50 1.50 3N S +4 ♦9 2-Miller-Talbott vs 1-Appel-Robins
520 0.50 1.50 3N S +4 ♦9 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
|
15 |
♠852
♥7542
♦AQ
♣KJ42
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q
♥Q9
♦86543
♣T9763
|
♠AJ93
♥AKJ863
♦97
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♦2 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
50 1.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♠4 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 3-Wilf-Wilf
420 0.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣A 2-Miller-Talbott vs 1-Appel-Robins
|
16 |
♠AT832
♥8
♦Q832
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠954
♥954
♦T97
♣AT54
|
♠KQJ76
♥AK32
♦KJ6
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1/-♦ 1/-♥ ♦7/6 ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 2N N ♥A 2-Miller-Talbott vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
100 1.00 1.00 1♠ E -1 ♥Q 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
100 0.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♠K 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Appel-Robins
|
17 |
♠J932
♥65
♦T
♣AKQT94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠Q85
♥KJ7
♦KQ9842
♣3
|
♠AK4
♥8432
♦AJ3
♣J52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♣8 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Appel-Robins
50 1.50 0.50 5♦ E -1 ♦7 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
100 0.00 2.00 4♣ N -2 ♠A 2-Miller-Talbott vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
|
18 |
♠T3
♥KQT854
♦AT8
♣96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠K874
♥-
♦J953
♣QJ875
|
♠AJ9652
♥632
♦K
♣T42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠A 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
170 1.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♠A 2-Miller-Talbott vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♣A 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Appel-Robins
|
19 |
♠QJT86
♥82
♦3
♣KT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠974
♥95
♦J9874
♣743
|
♠AK3
♥AJT3
♦KT2
♣J62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.50 0.50 3N S ♦7 2-Miller-Talbott vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
400 1.50 0.50 3N S ♦7 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
300 0.00 2.00 4♥* S -2 ♣3 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Appel-Robins
|
20 |
♠AQ754
♥QT93
♦AQ9
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KT83
♥2
♦KJT76
♣T84
|
♠J96
♥KJ74
♦82
♣9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2/3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♥4 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
680 1.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♦8 2-Miller-Talbott vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
620 0.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦8 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Appel-Robins
|
21 |
♠Q632
♥J82
♦T92
♣AT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT
♥94
♦AK3
♣Q98754
|
♠9874
♥AQT65
♦87
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 3♣ W ♠2 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Miller-Talbott
110 1.50 0.50 3♣ W ♦T 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♥5 1-Appel-Robins vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
|
22 |
♠43
♥QJT75
♦K5
♣K653
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQ
♥AK832
♦AT93
♣T4
|
♠AT9
♥964
♦J8742
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥4 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 4♥ W -4 ♠4 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
300 1.00 1.00 3♥ W -3 ♠4 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Miller-Talbott
110 0.00 2.00 2♥ W ♠4 1-Appel-Robins vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
|
23 |
♠8
♥KQ2
♦8432
♣AT643
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠J95
♥JT987
♦K976
♣Q
|
♠AT7
♥543
♦A5
♣KJ972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣Q 1-Appel-Robins vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
100 0.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♦7 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣Q 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Miller-Talbott
|
24 |
♠KQ542
♥J6
♦J7
♣8432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T
♥AKT83
♦QT53
♣AK9
|
♠973
♥742
♦964
♣JT76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♠ N -1 ♥2 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Miller-Talbott
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -2 ♥2 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
100 0.50 1.50 4♠* N -1 ♣J 1-Appel-Robins vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
|
25 |
♠QT6
♥A963
♦Q87
♣AK5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠84
♥KJT
♦JT93
♣QT64
|
♠52
♥8754
♦AK642
♣97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ -/1♥ 4♠ 3/2NT ♦5 ♥6/7 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 6-Kanekar-Hanson vs 5-Fraser-Lee-Huckabone
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦2 1-Appel-Robins vs 4-Bodeen-Bodeen
420 0.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦A 3-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Miller-Talbott
|