Hands and Results
1 |
♠T732
♥T63
♦J86
♣T73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠A854
♥4
♦A953
♣A862
|
♠6
♥K85
♦KQT74
♣KJ54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1/-♠ 4/1NT ♥6/4 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
170 3.00 1.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
210 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Weien-Purcell
400 1.00 3.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 1-Neal-Burlison
420 0.00 4.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
|
2 |
♠K92
♥6
♦AK9762
♣Q53
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠7643
♥QJ87532
♦-
♣T7
|
♠A85
♥AK94
♦QJT
♣AKJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♥ 4♠ 5NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Weien-Purcell
420 3.00 1.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
450 1.00 3.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 1-Neal-Burlison
450 1.00 3.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
450 1.00 3.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
|
3 |
♠J9
♥9
♦AJ854
♣K8752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠K863
♥AKQ65
♦97
♣JT
|
♠T742
♥JT3
♦KQ2
♣A63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠3 NT5/4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Weien-Purcell
110 2.00 2.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 1-Neal-Burlison
110 2.00 2.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
110 2.00 2.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
620 0.00 4.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
|
4 |
♠J7
♥A73
♦AT862
♣AQT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KT52
♥KQ42
♦3
♣J853
|
♠Q96
♥T86
♦KQJ74
♣K2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 5-Weien-Purcell
90 2.50 1.50 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
90 2.50 1.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
80 1.00 3.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 0.00 4.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Neal-Burlison
|
5 |
♠QJ83
♥7
♦A974
♣K854
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠97
♥T543
♦KJ62
♣J63
|
♠AK652
♥AKJ6
♦83
♣97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
100 3.00 1.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
50 1.00 3.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 5-Weien-Purcell
50 1.00 3.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Neal-Burlison
50 1.00 3.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
6 |
♠K843
♥QT864
♦65
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠765
♥K9
♦AJ2
♣T9643
|
♠QJT2
♥AJ753
♦T43
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
140 3.00 1.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 5-Weien-Purcell
120 2.00 2.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
50 1.00 3.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
100 0.00 4.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Neal-Burlison
|
7 |
♠753
♥AQJ83
♦KQ
♣Q87
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠KT862
♥K5
♦A98632
♣-
|
♠AQ9
♥76
♦J54
♣T6432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦2 ♠3 |
EW: 4/5♦ 4♠ ♣3 ♥2/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 5-Weien-Purcell
170 3.00 1.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
140 2.00 2.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
170 1.00 3.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
200 0.00 4.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 1-Neal-Burlison
|
8 |
♠62
♥KT942
♦7542
♣Q6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠A4
♥A87
♦J83
♣AKT73
|
♠KQJ5
♥J53
♦AK
♣J984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 3♥ 5/4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
400 3.00 1.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
460 1.50 2.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
460 1.50 2.50 4-Weller-Hermann vs 5-Weien-Purcell
490 0.00 4.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 1-Neal-Burlison
|
9 |
♠T9
♥Q
♦AQ942
♣AK875
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q64
♥J63
♦T86
♣QT96
|
♠A8532
♥954
♦KJ73
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
240 4.00 0.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
200 3.00 1.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 5-Weien-Purcell
170 2.00 2.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 1-Neal-Burlison
140 0.50 3.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
140 0.50 3.50 5-Landres-Landres vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
|
10 |
♠KT5
♥Q972
♦K76
♣KT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠974
♥4
♦J952
♣J9854
|
♠AJ8632
♥AKJ5
♦Q
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2/1♥ ♣6/5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 1-Neal-Burlison
110 2.00 2.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
110 2.00 2.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 5-Weien-Purcell
110 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
140 0.00 4.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
|
11 |
♠K6
♥Q8543
♦93
♣JT98
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠9532
♥J6
♦AKJ74
♣54
|
♠AQT874
♥A97
♦8
♣Q63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 2♦ 5♠ 4/3NT ♣5/4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
50 3.00 1.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 1-Neal-Burlison
150 1.50 2.50 1-Richards-Wyer vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
150 1.50 2.50 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 5-Weien-Purcell
200 0.00 4.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
|
12 |
♠JT964
♥975
♦532
♣J2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠A87
♥J82
♦KQ98
♣KQ8
|
♠Q3
♥T643
♦A6
♣AT975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3/2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
140 3.00 1.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
150 2.00 2.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
230 1.00 3.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 5-Weien-Purcell
460 0.00 4.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 1-Neal-Burlison
|
13 |
♠AK752
♥3
♦QJ94
♣K73
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠96
♥K8652
♦K73
♣A82
|
♠T43
♥Q
♦AT85
♣QT654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Neal-Burlison
140 3.50 0.50 5-Landres-Landres vs 5-Weien-Purcell
110 2.00 2.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 1.00 3.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
200 0.00 4.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
|
14 |
♠Q7
♥-
♦AKQ85
♣Q97542
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠J6
♥KQT952
♦J72
♣83
|
♠K9843
♥643
♦T93
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 2♥ 4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
440 2.50 1.50 4-Weller-Hermann vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
440 2.50 1.50 5-Landres-Landres vs 5-Weien-Purcell
420 1.00 3.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Neal-Burlison
170 0.00 4.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
|
15 |
♠A
♥J543
♦KQ9654
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT842
♥762
♦73
♣J54
|
♠J3
♥KQT8
♦AJ2
♣AQ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 1-Richards-Wyer vs 2-Coziahr-Ayres
150 3.00 1.00 2-Bentley-Kiehm vs 4-Hodge-Gooden
100 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Neal-Burlison
50 1.00 3.00 4-Weller-Hermann vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 0.00 4.00 5-Landres-Landres vs 5-Weien-Purcell
|