Hands and Results
1 |
♠AQ973
♥-
♦J87
♣KJT98
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠K85
♥KQJ9854
♦AK
♣7
|
♠J6
♥T7
♦QT943
♣A432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 1-Harris-Harris
420 2.63 1.38 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 6-Weien-Purcell
450 0.75 3.25 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Neal-Burlison
450 0.75 3.25 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
2 |
♠KQJ7
♥Q642
♦KT8
♣K7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AT92
♥AJ87
♦A
♣AQ64
|
♠53
♥K93
♦J732
♣JT93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 1-Harris-Harris
50 2.63 1.38 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 6-Weien-Purcell
110 1.38 2.63 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Neal-Burlison
400 0.13 3.88 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
3 |
♠J965
♥Q
♦J7532
♣K72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AK
♥JT9872
♦Q4
♣AT8
|
♠Q8
♥AK5
♦KT98
♣9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 2.00 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 1-Harris-Harris
620 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Neal-Burlison
620 2.00 2.00 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 6-Weien-Purcell
620 2.00 2.00 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
4 |
♠AJ75
♥85
♦K765
♣632
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠986
♥AKJ7
♦83
♣QJT7
|
♠T2
♥Q9632
♦QJT9
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
140 3.00 1.00 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 6-Weien-Purcell
110 1.00 3.00 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 5-Landres-Landres
110 1.00 3.00 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 1-Harris-Harris
110 1.00 3.00 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
5 |
♠A
♥AK75
♦984
♣T9652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠T842
♥83
♦AK53
♣AJ7
|
♠KQ953
♥J96
♦Q762
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 5-Landres-Landres
100 3.00 1.00 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 1-Harris-Harris
140 2.00 2.00 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 6-Weien-Purcell
170 1.00 3.00 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 4-Neal-Burlison
420 0.00 4.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
|
6 |
♠AKT4
♥K65
♦AT83
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠92
♥-
♦KQJ972
♣KJ872
|
♠J85
♥AJ9873
♦54
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 1-Harris-Harris
140 3.00 1.00 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 4-Neal-Burlison
100 2.00 2.00 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 6-Weien-Purcell
110 0.50 3.50 2-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
110 0.50 3.50 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
7 |
♠KJT875
♥J963
♦A
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠43
♥QT4
♦J986
♣QJ42
|
♠Q92
♥752
♦K742
♣A97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 5-Landres-Landres
620 2.63 1.38 2-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Harris-Harris
100 0.75 3.25 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 6-Weien-Purcell
100 0.75 3.25 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
|
8 |
♠3
♥AQ843
♦AT72
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T76
♥T62
♦Q3
♣AJ987
|
♠QJ9854
♥K97
♦J85
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.88 0.13 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 6-Weien-Purcell
200 2.63 1.38 2-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Harris-Harris
170 1.38 2.63 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 5-Landres-Landres
100 0.13 3.88 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
|
9 |
♠A87652
♥74
♦AJ3
♣A9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQT
♥8532
♦952
♣854
|
♠4
♥KJ6
♦KQ8764
♣T72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.67 0.33 2-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Harris-Harris
420 2.00 2.00 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 5-Landres-Landres
170 0.33 3.67 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
|
10 |
♠QJ95
♥K963
♦Q9
♣863
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠T83
♥AT
♦KJ82
♣KQT9
|
♠K62
♥J852
♦64
♣AJ52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 1.17 2-Weller-Hermann vs 6-Weien-Purcell
100 2.83 1.17 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
630 0.33 3.67 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
11 |
♠QT85
♥AQ52
♦2
♣AK72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AJ764
♥T4
♦Q954
♣54
|
♠K3
♥K963
♦T73
♣QT98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 2-Weller-Hermann vs 6-Weien-Purcell
110 2.00 2.00 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 4-Neal-Burlison
100 0.33 3.67 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
|
12 |
♠JT6
♥Q6
♦Q98432
♣76
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠A972
♥J9732
♦J6
♣J2
|
♠Q843
♥AT854
♦7
♣854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.67 0.33 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
640 2.00 2.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 6-Weien-Purcell
130 0.33 3.67 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
13 |
♠AJ
♥T9742
♦AKQ74
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠K2
♥AKQ
♦J83
♣T7632
|
♠Q9765
♥J85
♦96
♣Q54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
110 2.00 2.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 4-Neal-Burlison
110 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Harris-Harris
80 0.13 3.88 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
14 |
♠J97
♥K732
♦A
♣J9752
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠KQ542
♥-
♦JT84
♣AQT3
|
♠A63
♥8654
♦Q32
♣K84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
110 2.63 1.38 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 5-Landres-Landres
170 0.75 3.25 2-Weller-Hermann vs 4-Neal-Burlison
170 0.75 3.25 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Harris-Harris
|
15 |
♠QJ
♥JT8
♦-
♣AKJ98643
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠K52
♥542
♦QJ52
♣QT5
|
♠A94
♥AKQ3
♦AK964
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ -/5NT ♣5/6 NT5/11 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 5-Landres-Landres
150 2.63 1.38 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Harris-Harris
400 1.38 2.63 2-Weller-Hermann vs 4-Neal-Burlison
500 0.13 3.88 1-Beaton-Meyers vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
|
16 |
♠32
♥9843
♦Q43
♣7653
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJT95
♥Q
♦AK9
♣AQT2
|
♠A84
♥KJ72
♦JT75
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4/5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Landres-Landres
650 1.38 2.63 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
650 1.38 2.63 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 4-Neal-Burlison
650 1.38 2.63 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 6-Weien-Purcell
|
17 |
♠T943
♥753
♦Q43
♣873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠A876
♥QT62
♦86
♣T54
|
♠K
♥AJ984
♦A952
♣AJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 0.75 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Landres-Landres
170 3.25 0.75 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 6-Weien-Purcell
420 1.38 2.63 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
450 0.13 3.88 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
18 |
♠T5
♥A
♦AK95
♣AKQ632
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠QJ4
♥KT864
♦432
♣J8
|
♠AK9832
♥QJ72
♦J7
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 5-Sonnenshein-Principe vs 4-Neal-Burlison
150 2.00 2.00 4-Ayers-Simonds vs 2-Hodge-Gooden
150 2.00 2.00 6-Thompson-Christianson vs 6-Weien-Purcell
170 0.13 3.88 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Landres-Landres
|