Hands and Results
1 |
♠AKJT72
♥T5
♦J2
♣762
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠98543
♥873
♦AT5
♣AT
|
♠Q
♥AQJ92
♦KQ9
♣KQ54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 4-Neal-Burlison
50 2.50 1.50 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
50 2.50 1.50 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 6-Purcell-Weien
170 1.00 3.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 7-Wais-Wais
200 0.00 4.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
|
2 |
♠AJ8
♥KQJT
♦84
♣KQT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠975
♥87
♦Q963
♣J985
|
♠T642
♥A63
♦AKT7
♣76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
620 3.50 0.50 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 4-Neal-Burlison
100 1.50 2.50 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
100 1.50 2.50 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 6-Purcell-Weien
200 0.00 4.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 7-Wais-Wais
|
3 |
♠AQ876
♥AKJ63
♦62
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJ9
♥T875
♦AQT
♣K32
|
♠T53
♥2
♦K754
♣QT954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ -/1♦ ♦6/7 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 1.50 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
110 2.50 1.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 7-Wais-Wais
110 2.50 1.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
110 2.50 1.50 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 6-Purcell-Weien
80 0.00 4.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
4 |
♠J9842
♥Q762
♦5
♣A93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AK
♥4
♦T876
♣KQ6542
|
♠Q653
♥T83
♦QJ4
♣JT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 5-Landres-Landres
620 3.00 1.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
400 2.00 2.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
140 1.00 3.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
110 0.00 4.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 7-Wais-Wais
|
5 |
♠764
♥Q653
♦943
♣AJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AJT83
♥T9
♦KT5
♣976
|
♠K
♥AJ874
♦872
♣KT82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
50 3.00 1.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
100 2.00 2.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 5-Landres-Landres
150 1.00 3.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 7-Wais-Wais
400 0.00 4.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
|
6 |
♠T65
♥K9732
♦53
♣532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJ8732
♥-
♦JT64
♣KT4
|
♠AQ
♥AQ65
♦AK97
♣AQ7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 7-Wais-Wais
680 2.50 1.50 2-Weller-Hermann vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
680 2.50 1.50 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
710 1.00 3.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 5-Landres-Landres
1430 0.00 4.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
|
7 |
♠Q4
♥J853
♦KJ63
♣A82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠KT732
♥92
♦AT7
♣JT4
|
♠A985
♥KQ
♦9542
♣K93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.50 0.50 2-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
PASS 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
100 1.50 2.50 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 6-Purcell-Weien
100 1.50 2.50 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
110 0.00 4.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
8 |
♠73
♥KJ9753
♦AK84
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠JT865
♥A
♦Q7653
♣64
|
♠AQ2
♥T84
♦J92
♣QJT7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
170 2.00 2.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 6-Purcell-Weien
170 2.00 2.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
170 2.00 2.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 4-Neal-Burlison
140 0.00 4.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|
9 |
♠KQJ2
♥T6
♦T87
♣9742
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠9873
♥A3
♦A32
♣KQT5
|
♠A65
♥J874
♦KQ64
♣86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
90 3.00 1.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
110 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
120 1.00 3.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 6-Purcell-Weien
150 0.00 4.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
10 |
♠AKT2
♥J92
♦J2
♣T982
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠953
♥AT43
♦A863
♣Q6
|
♠Q876
♥86
♦Q75
♣A753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 7-Wais-Wais
120 2.50 1.50 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 5-Landres-Landres
120 2.50 1.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
100 1.00 3.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
200 0.00 4.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
11 |
♠8754
♥Q5
♦AQ87654
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠JT32
♥A642
♦2
♣9832
|
♠A
♥T98
♦JT9
♣KQJT76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 2/3♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 7-Wais-Wais
420 3.00 1.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
130 2.00 2.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 4-Neal-Burlison
110 1.00 3.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 5-Landres-Landres
50 0.00 4.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|
12 |
♠J92
♥Q97
♦765
♣KJT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠A
♥AJ654
♦Q9
♣97642
|
♠QT84
♥KT3
♦KJ43
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 4-Neal-Burlison
100 2.63 1.38 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
170 0.75 3.25 2-Weller-Hermann vs 7-Wais-Wais
170 0.75 3.25 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
|
13 |
♠KQ653
♥A2
♦AQT7
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠T82
♥KJ
♦J8652
♣Q43
|
♠9
♥Q87654
♦94
♣JT97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 7♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.50 1.50 2-Weller-Hermann vs 6-Purcell-Weien
680 2.50 1.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
680 2.50 1.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
680 2.50 1.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 5-Landres-Landres
650 0.00 4.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
14 |
♠JT96
♥K85
♦A6
♣8652
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠KQ532
♥3
♦T432
♣J43
|
♠A7
♥AQJ2
♦KQJ95
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2/1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
150 3.00 1.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 6-Purcell-Weien
200 2.00 2.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 4-Neal-Burlison
400 1.00 3.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
460 0.00 4.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
15 |
♠K6
♥T986
♦642
♣KT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠T
♥KQ5432
♦JT8
♣A83
|
♠J872
♥-
♦AK75
♣Q9742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 2NT ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 6-Purcell-Weien
140 3.00 1.00 1-Thompson-Christianson vs 4-Neal-Burlison
110 1.50 2.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
110 1.50 2.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 5-Landres-Landres
100 0.00 4.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
|
16 |
♠9842
♥T654
♦8
♣KQ98
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJT763
♥A98
♦-
♣J542
|
♠Q5
♥Q732
♦T9543
♣73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5/4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.50 0.50 2-Weller-Hermann vs 5-Landres-Landres
400 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 7-Wais-Wais
150 1.50 2.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
150 1.50 2.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 4-Neal-Burlison
50 0.00 4.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 6-Purcell-Weien
|
17 |
♠KQ9654
♥J5
♦A
♣J873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠T73
♥QT872
♦653
♣54
|
♠82
♥K64
♦T98742
♣KQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 6-Purcell-Weien
450 3.00 1.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 5-Landres-Landres
50 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 7-Wais-Wais
100 0.50 3.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
100 0.50 3.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
18 |
♠T42
♥T654
♦843
♣JT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠J975
♥Q987
♦652
♣Q6
|
♠Q83
♥AK2
♦AT9
♣A975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5/6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 2-Ayres-Coziahr
50 3.00 1.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 7-Wais-Wais
100 2.00 2.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 6-Purcell-Weien
200 1.00 3.00 2-Weller-Hermann vs 5-Landres-Landres
280 0.00 4.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 4-Neal-Burlison
|
19 |
♠Q865
♥9864
♦AQ7
♣Q9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠T932
♥JT
♦T95
♣K765
|
♠AK
♥AQ5
♦864
♣AJ832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 6-Purcell-Weien
110 3.50 0.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
120 2.00 2.00 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 5-Landres-Landres
130 0.50 3.50 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
130 0.50 3.50 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 7-Wais-Wais
|
20 |
♠Q
♥AQ83
♦KQ8765
♣86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠A9875
♥975
♦J
♣KQJ7
|
♠K42
♥K642
♦AT92
♣T9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
90 3.50 0.50 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 5-Landres-Landres
110 2.00 2.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 7-Wais-Wais
170 1.00 3.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
200 0.00 4.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 6-Purcell-Weien
|
21 |
♠AKJ
♥QJ72
♦A854
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠8643
♥K9843
♦J7
♣T5
|
♠T5
♥T5
♦QT96
♣KQ872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 6-Purcell-Weien
630 3.50 0.50 6-Meyers-Beaton vs 5-Landres-Landres
600 2.00 2.00 4-Bentley-Kiehm vs 1-Hodge-Gooden
150 1.00 3.00 7-Sonnenshein-Levin vs 7-Wais-Wais
140 0.00 4.00 5-Jacobs-Simonds vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|