Hands and Results
1 |
♠T642
♥AQJ64
♦T3
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠Q
♥K8
♦K5
♣AKQJT932
|
♠KJ97
♥9732
♦9874
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 1-Landres-Landres vs 1-Pollis-Royce
400 0.83 2.17 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
400 0.83 2.17 5-Burlison-Meade vs 4-Simonds-Principe
|
2 |
♠T6543
♥QJ7
♦AK63
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠A
♥AT9543
♦Q2
♣AT92
|
♠K72
♥K62
♦754
♣KQ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 4♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 1-Landres-Landres vs 1-Pollis-Royce
420 0.83 2.17 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
420 0.83 2.17 5-Burlison-Meade vs 4-Simonds-Principe
|
3 |
♠-
♥KQ87
♦KQ876
♣AKQJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQT84
♥A2
♦92
♣9642
|
♠A72
♥43
♦AJT53
♣T83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ ♣6 ♠5/6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦5/6 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.83 0.17 5-Burlison-Meade vs 4-Simonds-Principe
70 1.50 1.50 1-Landres-Landres vs 1-Pollis-Royce
110 0.17 2.83 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
|
4 |
♠T73
♥6
♦T9742
♣8653
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠95
♥AQJ32
♦A
♣KQJT9
|
♠KQJ8
♥T9875
♦65
♣74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3/4 |
EW: 4♣ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
620 1.00 2.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
620 1.00 2.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 4-Simonds-Principe
620 1.00 2.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 1-Pollis-Royce
|
5 |
♠AKJT96
♥JT75
♦86
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠75432
♥986
♦93
♣AQ2
|
♠Q
♥A32
♦AKJT
♣KJ875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
100 2.00 1.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 1-Pollis-Royce
150 1.00 2.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 4-Simonds-Principe
180 0.00 3.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
|
6 |
♠AK62
♥32
♦AKJ3
♣A62
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠J9
♥A97
♦97
♣QJ7543
|
♠T874
♥KQT4
♦852
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
180 2.00 1.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 4-Simonds-Principe
150 1.00 2.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
110 0.00 3.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 1-Pollis-Royce
|
7 |
♠T4
♥K73
♦AQ95
♣8642
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠932
♥JT865
♦J3
♣KJ3
|
♠AK6
♥Q2
♦T64
♣AQ975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1-Landres-Landres vs 4-Simonds-Principe
100 2.00 1.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 1-Pollis-Royce
90 1.00 2.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
100 0.00 3.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
|
8 |
♠AT3
♥T
♦AK73
♣J9875
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q87542
♥AJ9
♦62
♣K2
|
♠KJ6
♥86532
♦J5
♣AT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
90 2.00 1.00 1-Landres-Landres vs 4-Simonds-Principe
50 1.00 2.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 1-Pollis-Royce
140 0.00 3.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
|
9 |
♠J52
♥J6
♦A87
♣QJ964
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠A863
♥AK9832
♦T95
♣-
|
♠KQT4
♥QT75
♦QJ43
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ ♣4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 1.00 1-Landres-Landres vs 4-Simonds-Principe
110 2.00 1.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 1-Pollis-Royce
110 2.00 1.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
500 0.00 3.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
|
10 |
♠AT65
♥Q62
♦AT8
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠42
♥AJT85
♦QJ53
♣AK
|
♠K97
♥9743
♦9742
♣82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦4/5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 1-Landres-Landres vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
110 2.00 1.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
80 1.00 2.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 1-Pollis-Royce
200 0.00 3.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 4-Simonds-Principe
|
11 |
♠Q842
♥J95
♦KT5
♣K84
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AKT
♥K2
♦876
♣Q9753
|
♠975
♥87643
♦AQ3
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ -/1♠ ♣5/6 ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 1-Pollis-Royce
110 2.00 1.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
50 1.00 2.00 1-Landres-Landres vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
100 0.00 3.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 4-Simonds-Principe
|
12 |
♠KQ86
♥K65
♦-
♣KQ9742
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠AJ2
♥AJT972
♦7
♣863
|
♠953
♥Q3
♦AKQJT5
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣3/4 ♠3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 4-Simonds-Principe
100 1.00 2.00 1-Landres-Landres vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
100 1.00 2.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
100 1.00 2.00 5-Burlison-Meade vs 1-Pollis-Royce
|
13 |
♠43
♥AT962
♦AJ2
♣T97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠K87
♥J853
♦65
♣Q652
|
♠QT52
♥KQ
♦KT74
♣AKJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 4-Simonds-Principe
120 1.50 1.50 1-Landres-Landres vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
120 1.50 1.50 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
650 0.00 3.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 1-Pollis-Royce
|
14 |
♠QT63
♥K
♦9843
♣T965
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠J9542
♥A6
♦KJ65
♣K7
|
♠AK
♥QJT9875
♦QT
♣Q3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 1-Landres-Landres vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
200 2.50 0.50 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 1-Pollis-Royce
420 1.00 2.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
450 0.00 3.00 2-Wais-Wais vs 4-Simonds-Principe
|
15 |
♠92
♥Q864
♦87653
♣84
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠KQ7643
♥A
♦A92
♣T32
|
♠85
♥J73
♦QJT4
♣KQJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦3/4 ♠2/3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 0.00 3-Ayres-Hermann vs 1-Pollis-Royce
140 2.00 1.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 3-Hodge-Gooden
170 0.50 2.50 1-Landres-Landres vs 2-Jakobsen-Flores
170 0.50 2.50 2-Wais-Wais vs 4-Simonds-Principe
|