Hands and Results
1 |
♠65
♥53
♦KQT96
♣J976
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠J732
♥JT98
♦AJ75
♣5
|
♠AK4
♥AQ742
♦43
♣T83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦4/6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 1-Purcell-Weien
50 3.50 0.50 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 6-Meade-Burlison
50 2.00 2.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
140 1.00 3.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
150 0.00 4.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
2 |
♠T6
♥KJ95
♦KQT4
♣QJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AQ83
♥QT62
♦J73
♣43
|
♠7542
♥843
♦52
♣AK75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 5-Landres-Landres
130 3.00 1.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
120 1.50 2.50 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 1-Purcell-Weien
120 1.50 2.50 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 6-Meade-Burlison
110 0.00 4.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
|
3 |
♠976
♥AJ865
♦J74
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AJ852
♥KQT3
♦-
♣Q985
|
♠KQT
♥94
♦AKQT62
♣J3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.88 0.13 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 6-Meade-Burlison
620 2.63 1.38 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
680 0.75 3.25 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 1-Purcell-Weien
680 0.75 3.25 6-Wais-Wais vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
4 |
♠KQ
♥J93
♦AJ8642
♣K6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠94
♥QT8742
♦K93
♣43
|
♠T862
♥A5
♦T5
♣QJ982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠0/1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 0.50 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 6-Meade-Burlison
630 3.50 0.50 6-Wais-Wais vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
600 2.00 2.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 5-Landres-Landres
100 1.00 3.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 2-Butler-Bennett
200 0.00 4.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 1-Purcell-Weien
|
5 |
♠AKQ2
♥AK63
♦T97
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠93
♥T542
♦Q8
♣JT732
|
♠J876
♥J
♦642
♣Q9864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 7♦ 7♥ 6♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
680 2.00 2.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 2-Butler-Bennett
680 2.00 2.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 5-Landres-Landres
680 2.00 2.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 1-Purcell-Weien
100 0.00 4.00 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 6-Meade-Burlison
|
6 |
♠J753
♥62
♦86
♣QJ754
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q842
♥K8
♦KQJ4
♣632
|
♠6
♥9743
♦97532
♣K98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3/4♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠2 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 6-Meade-Burlison
110 3.00 1.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 1-Purcell-Weien
50 2.00 2.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
100 1.00 3.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 5-Landres-Landres
400 0.00 4.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 2-Butler-Bennett
|
7 |
♠72
♥QJ2
♦85
♣QJT953
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠QT4
♥5
♦AQ7432
♣AK6
|
♠KJ985
♥T3
♦JT9
♣742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ -/2NT ♦2 ♠2 NT5/8 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 5-Landres-Landres
100 1.38 2.63 2-Richard-Morris vs 1-Purcell-Weien
100 1.38 2.63 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
100 1.38 2.63 6-Wais-Wais vs 2-Butler-Bennett
|
8 |
♠A652
♥J8
♦QJ93
♣983
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠J9843
♥T732
♦A65
♣Q
|
♠T
♥Q
♦T872
♣AJ76542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.25 0.75 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 5-Landres-Landres
420 3.25 0.75 2-Richard-Morris vs 1-Purcell-Weien
170 1.38 2.63 6-Wais-Wais vs 2-Butler-Bennett
50 0.13 3.88 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|
9 |
♠K654
♥A95
♦AQJ9
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q2
♥K864
♦65
♣Q9874
|
♠A3
♥QT72
♦K32
♣J652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4/3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.88 0.13 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
140 2.63 1.38 2-Richard-Morris vs 1-Purcell-Weien
100 1.38 2.63 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 5-Landres-Landres
200 0.13 3.88 6-Wais-Wais vs 2-Butler-Bennett
|
10 |
♠Q872
♥K3
♦T8
♣K6542
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠KT65
♥A87652
♦Q65
♣-
|
♠AJ94
♥Q9
♦KJ743
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
100 2.63 1.38 2-Richard-Morris vs 6-Meade-Burlison
620 1.38 2.63 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Butler-Bennett
650 0.13 3.88 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
|
11 |
♠AKQT5
♥654
♦Q64
♣J8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠J62
♥T983
♦K5
♣A432
|
♠98743
♥KJ
♦AT82
♣95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠5/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.88 0.13 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Butler-Bennett
110 2.63 1.38 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
90 1.38 2.63 2-Richard-Morris vs 6-Meade-Burlison
150 0.13 3.88 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|
12 |
♠T987652
♥Q53
♦T
♣T3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠K43
♥J7
♦KQ32
♣A962
|
♠AQ
♥K4
♦J9864
♣KJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.25 0.75 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Butler-Bennett
150 3.25 0.75 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
90 1.38 2.63 2-Richard-Morris vs 6-Meade-Burlison
210 0.13 3.88 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|
13 |
♠QT974
♥842
♦2
♣AJT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠J63
♥65
♦JT3
♣KQ654
|
♠85
♥AQ97
♦AQ865
♣87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1/-♦ ♣5 ♦7/6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Purcell-Weien
200 3.00 1.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
150 2.00 2.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
100 1.00 3.00 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 2-Butler-Bennett
90 0.00 4.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 5-Landres-Landres
|
14 |
♠T7432
♥AJ82
♦QJ
♣J2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠KJ
♥QT64
♦KT92
♣754
|
♠Q985
♥K7
♦864
♣K963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Purcell-Weien
120 3.00 1.00 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 2-Butler-Bennett
50 2.00 2.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 5-Landres-Landres
100 0.50 3.50 2-Richard-Morris vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
100 0.50 3.50 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
|
15 |
♠K96
♥T82
♦AJ86
♣852
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠T82
♥Q743
♦Q9
♣KJ93
|
♠AQJ43
♥AJ6
♦T2
♣AQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 5-Landres-Landres
420 2.00 2.00 1-Simonds-Del Principe vs 2-Butler-Bennett
420 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Purcell-Weien
420 2.00 2.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
450 0.00 4.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
|
16 |
♠AQJ6
♥865
♦AK987
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠87432
♥J74
♦J43
♣Q8
|
♠T
♥QT92
♦Q2
♣T76532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Landres-Landres
490 2.50 1.50 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 2-Butler-Bennett
490 2.50 1.50 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
460 1.00 3.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
180 0.00 4.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 6-Meade-Burlison
|
17 |
♠QJ97532
♥52
♦Q92
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠-
♥AKT
♦K83
♣AKQJ873
|
♠AT8
♥J63
♦T654
♣654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♠ ♣1/2 ♦4/5 ♥5/6 NT1/2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
400 3.00 1.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Landres-Landres
420 2.00 2.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 6-Meade-Burlison
500 1.00 3.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
920 0.00 4.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 2-Butler-Bennett
|
18 |
♠Q7
♥A976
♦K9642
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠82
♥T43
♦QJ
♣KQJ743
|
♠A965
♥QJ82
♦53
♣A65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 5-Christianson-Thompson vs 4-Gooden-Hodge
130 3.00 1.00 2-Richard-Morris vs 3-Flores-Jakobsen
100 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Landres-Landres
PASS 1.00 3.00 4-Kiehm-Bentley vs 2-Butler-Bennett
100 0.00 4.00 6-Wais-Wais vs 6-Meade-Burlison
|