Hands and Results
1 |
♠T84
♥KQT42
♦AQT
♣94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠Q9762
♥85
♦K54
♣KT3
|
♠K3
♥J973
♦J632
♣AJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ N ♦2 5-Kantor-Mann vs 3-Batko-Walters
PASS 4.00 1.00 Pass Out 2-Jones-Casey vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
50 2.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♠6 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 2.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♠K 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 8-Lane-Matz
100 1.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠K 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 1-Madison-Rodger
150 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -3 ♦3 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
2 |
♠74
♥T82
♦A65
♣AQ762
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠KJ2
♥A9
♦KT74
♣KT43
|
♠A95
♥7643
♦Q983
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2/3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦4 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
90 3.50 1.50 1N W ♠7 5-Kantor-Mann vs 3-Batko-Walters
90 3.50 1.50 1N W ♣6 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 8-Lane-Matz
120 1.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♣6 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
120 1.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♣6 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 1-Madison-Rodger
150 0.00 5.00 1N W +2 ♣6 2-Jones-Casey vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
|
3 |
♠2
♥AQJT6
♦KQT86
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠93
♥9543
♦A2
♣QT843
|
♠AK64
♥K87
♦J754
♣96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N S ♣4 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♣4 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 8-Lane-Matz
110 3.00 2.00 2♠ S ♥4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 1-Madison-Rodger
50 2.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♣4 5-Kantor-Mann vs 3-Batko-Walters
100 1.00 4.00 3N N -2 2-Jones-Casey vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
150 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -3 ♣4 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
4 |
♠AQJ5
♥986
♦AKT
♣Q93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠9732
♥AK7
♦QJ3
♣J82
|
♠KT64
♥J542
♦86
♣T64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♠4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 2-Jones-Casey
630 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♥6 1-Madison-Rodger vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
630 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 3-Batko-Walters vs 8-Lane-Matz
630 3.50 1.50 3N N +1 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 5-Kantor-Mann
180 1.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♠4 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ S ♥A 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
5 |
♠9
♥T42
♦87543
♣9742
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠K85
♥Q9876
♦AK
♣AKQ
|
♠76432
♥AK
♦JT9
♣J63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 2♣ W +2 ♠9 3-Batko-Walters vs 8-Lane-Matz
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♦2 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
450 3.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠9 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 5-Kantor-Mann
460 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♦5 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
460 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 2-Jones-Casey
590 0.00 5.00 4♠* E ♥2 1-Madison-Rodger vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
|
6 |
♠A9862
♥4
♦QJ9
♣QT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KT5
♥JT62
♦K652
♣A5
|
♠Q43
♥Q7
♦AT4
♣J7643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.50 0.50 2♥ S ♣A 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 5-Kantor-Mann
110 4.50 0.50 2♥ S 3-Batko-Walters vs 8-Lane-Matz
50 2.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♠T 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
50 2.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♠5 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 2-Jones-Casey
50 2.00 3.00 2♥ S -1 ♦2 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
150 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -3 ♦2 1-Madison-Rodger vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
|
7 |
♠QT86
♥974
♦J9
♣QT95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AJ74
♥KQ53
♦Q7
♣743
|
♠952
♥JT82
♦KT
♣AK62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♦J 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
100 4.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♦A 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 5-Kantor-Mann
100 3.00 2.00 3♦ S -1 ♥K 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 3-Batko-Walters
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ E ♠K 1-Madison-Rodger vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
110 1.50 3.50 1♥ E +1 ♣J 2-Jones-Casey vs 8-Lane-Matz
200 0.00 5.00 3♦ S -2 ♥K 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
8 |
♠Q865
♥AK97
♦Q9
♣Q84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠4
♥8
♦KJT7542
♣KT76
|
♠KJ9732
♥532
♦A6
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠4 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 5-Kantor-Mann
300 4.00 1.00 5♦* W -2 ♥A 1-Madison-Rodger vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠4 2-Jones-Casey vs 8-Lane-Matz
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠4 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠4 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 1.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♠4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 3-Batko-Walters
|
9 |
♠QJ74
♥Q85
♦KT52
♣T6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AK8
♥742
♦J63
♣AJ87
|
♠T
♥AT963
♦AQ87
♣Q32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠2 1-Madison-Rodger vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
100 4.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
620 3.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 3-Batko-Walters
630 2.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♠4 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
660 1.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠4 2-Jones-Casey vs 8-Lane-Matz
800 0.00 5.00 4♠* S -4 ♥2 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 5-Kantor-Mann
|
10 |
♠AKT4
♥32
♦62
♣QJT96
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠Q9
♥A54
♦T84
♣87432
|
♠7632
♥Q97
♦AKQ93
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♦4 5-Kantor-Mann vs 1-Madison-Rodger
100 4.00 1.00 3♦ E -1 ♣K 3-Batko-Walters vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
90 2.00 3.00 1N W ♣Q 2-Jones-Casey vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ E ♣K 8-Lane-Matz vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
90 2.00 3.00 2♦ E ♣Q 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ E ♦5 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
11 |
♠KJ3
♥J8742
♦A963
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AT9865
♥53
♦-
♣KQJ98
|
♠Q72
♥AKQ
♦KJ82
♣764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ -/1♥ ♣2 ♥6/7 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♠ 3/2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♥9 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
100 4.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♥T 5-Kantor-Mann vs 1-Madison-Rodger
420 3.00 2.00 4♠ W ♥4 8-Lane-Matz vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥2 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
450 1.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣A 2-Jones-Casey vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
500 0.00 5.00 2♥* N -3 ♥K 3-Batko-Walters vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
|
12 |
♠QT854
♥A93
♦AJ7
♣J4
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠J3
♥K82
♦T652
♣T963
|
♠AK962
♥76
♦43
♣A752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2/3 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♣T 2-Jones-Casey vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 3-Batko-Walters vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♣T 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
650 3.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
200 0.50 4.50 3♥ N +2 8-Lane-Matz vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
200 0.50 4.50 2♥ S +3 ♣T 5-Kantor-Mann vs 1-Madison-Rodger
|
13 |
♠763
♥Q98
♦T4
♣AQT42
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠JT
♥AK32
♦KJ62
♣987
|
♠A985
♥764
♦Q983
♣K5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 5.00 0.00 Pass Out 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 1-Madison-Rodger
90 4.00 1.00 1N W ♣4 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Jones-Casey
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 ♥A 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 3-Batko-Walters
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ S -1 ♦3 8-Lane-Matz vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
100 2.00 3.00 3♣ N -1 ♦3 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ W 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 5-Kantor-Mann
|
14 |
♠J96
♥843
♦KJ5
♣Q953
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠K874
♥AKJ76
♦876
♣2
|
♠AT532
♥Q52
♦-
♣KT874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 6♥ 6♠ ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♦K 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 5-Kantor-Mann
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ W +2 ♦K 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
230 3.00 2.00 3♥ W +3 ♦K 8-Lane-Matz vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
300 2.00 3.00 5♦* S -2 ♥A 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 3-Batko-Walters
420 1.00 4.00 4♥ W ♦5 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Jones-Casey
450 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♥T 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 1-Madison-Rodger
|
15 |
♠AQ6
♥AK7
♦T98652
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠KJT92
♥98543
♦J3
♣Q
|
♠53
♥QJT2
♦K4
♣97532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 7♦ 1♥ 4♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 ♠3 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.90 0.10 3N N +4 ♥Q 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Jones-Casey
690 3.70 1.30 3N N +3 ♥Q 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
AVE+ AVE- 3.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥Q 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 3-Batko-Walters
660 2.50 2.50 3N N +2 ♥Q 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 1-Madison-Rodger
600 0.70 4.30 3N S ♥Q 8-Lane-Matz vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
600 0.70 4.30 3N N ♥6 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 5-Kantor-Mann
|
16 |
♠QT92
♥K93
♦A9
♣QJ83
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠K64
♥J76
♦KQT5
♣KT2
|
♠J85
♥QT
♦7432
♣A974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ S ♠4 1-Madison-Rodger vs 8-Lane-Matz
110 3.50 1.50 2♥ S ♦K 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Kantor-Mann vs 2-Jones-Casey
90 1.00 4.00 2♦ W ♥3 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -2 ♥6 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 3-Batko-Walters
|
17 |
♠J65
♥AKJ4
♦QT72
♣53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠KQ74
♥9732
♦543
♣76
|
♠AT9
♥QT65
♦AKJ9
♣KJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♦ 3♥ 3/2♠ ♣4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦A 5-Kantor-Mann vs 2-Jones-Casey
100 3.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♠8 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
100 3.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♣5 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 3-Batko-Walters
50 2.00 3.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Madison-Rodger vs 8-Lane-Matz
50 1.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♦5 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
140 0.00 5.00 3♥ W ♣5 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
18 |
♠QJ98
♥542
♦Q86
♣A64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT7
♥KT97
♦KJ
♣T832
|
♠532
♥QJ3
♦9743
♣J75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣2 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 3-Batko-Walters
630 4.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣2 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥T 5-Kantor-Mann vs 2-Jones-Casey
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥7 1-Madison-Rodger vs 8-Lane-Matz
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥7 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣2 10-O'Neill-Blake vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
19 |
♠9763
♥JT6
♦AT2
♣762
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AJT2
♥AKQ
♦KQ8763
♣-
|
♠54
♥9853
♦J9
♣KT854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2/3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♣7 2-Jones-Casey vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
130 3.50 1.50 2♦ W +2 ♣7 5-Kantor-Mann vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
130 3.50 1.50 2♦ W +2 ♣7 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Batko-Walters
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♠K 8-Lane-Matz vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
200 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +3 ♠K 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 1-Madison-Rodger
630 0.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♣Q 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
|
20 |
♠AT7643
♥AQ93
♦3
♣A9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KQ
♥8
♦AT9852
♣KQ42
|
♠J9852
♥2
♦KQ4
♣J876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
850 5.00 0.00 5♥* S ♥8 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Batko-Walters
650 2.00 3.00 5♥ S ♦A 5-Kantor-Mann vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♦A 2-Jones-Casey vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♣K 8-Lane-Matz vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♣K 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 1-Madison-Rodger
650 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♣K 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
|
21 |
♠K8763
♥876
♦K9
♣AK4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠T5
♥QJ4
♦J762
♣9853
|
♠J92
♥KT9
♦T843
♣T72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 4.00 1.00 6N S ♦2 5-Kantor-Mann vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
1440 4.00 1.00 6N S ♣9 8-Lane-Matz vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
1440 4.00 1.00 6N N ♠T 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 7-Boyer-Boyer
1430 2.00 3.00 6♠ N ♣T 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Batko-Walters
680 0.50 4.50 5♠ N +1 ♦T 2-Jones-Casey vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
680 0.50 4.50 4♠ N +2 ♥T 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 1-Madison-Rodger
|
22 |
♠8642
♥952
♦Q532
♣Q3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠QJ9
♥6
♦K9876
♣A965
|
♠T753
♥AQT8
♦JT
♣T42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 1♥ N +2 ♠Q 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 8-Lane-Matz
120 4.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♣5 3-Batko-Walters vs 1-Madison-Rodger
110 3.00 2.00 1♥ S +1 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
90 2.00 3.00 11-Elad-Brilmyer vs 2-Jones-Casey
50 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♣A 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 5-Kantor-Mann
100 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -2 ♥6 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
|
23 |
♠T7
♥T942
♦AT762
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠962
♥Q876
♦KQ
♣7532
|
♠KQ854
♥KJ5
♦54
♣AT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 5.00 0.00 3♠* E -3 ♣K 3-Batko-Walters vs 1-Madison-Rodger
150 4.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♥4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 8-Lane-Matz
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♠K 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 5-Kantor-Mann
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♣K 2-Jones-Casey vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♣K 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
|
24 |
♠AKT
♥AJ872
♦T
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠QJ83
♥KQ
♦AK65
♣653
|
♠654
♥953
♦Q842
♣K92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.30 0.70 2♥ N +3 ♦5 9-Warner-Gilliam vs 5-Kantor-Mann
200 4.30 0.70 2♥ N +3 ♦2 6-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♦2 2-Jones-Casey vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
150 1.30 3.70 1N W -3 ♥2 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 4-Zellmer-Oakley
110 0.10 4.90 2♣ N +1 ♦4 3-Batko-Walters vs 1-Madison-Rodger
|
25 |
♠AQ2
♥QT84
♦Q3
♣AT96
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJ5
♥K9
♦A9874
♣QJ3
|
♠T7643
♥A62
♦J65
♣54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 4♦ W -4 ♥4 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
170 3.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 ♦A 8-Lane-Matz vs 5-Kantor-Mann
170 3.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 ♣Q 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 2-Jones-Casey
140 1.50 3.50 3♥ S ♠5 1-Madison-Rodger vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
140 1.50 3.50 2♥ S +1 ♣Q 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ W -1 3-Batko-Walters vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
|
26 |
♠93
♥QT85
♦5
♣QT9743
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJ75
♥AJ76
♦KQ6
♣2
|
♠K642
♥-
♦J9843
♣AKJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1/2♣ 6♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♦5 1-Madison-Rodger vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
100 4.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♦5 3-Batko-Walters vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
100 4.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♦5 8-Lane-Matz vs 5-Kantor-Mann
680 2.00 3.00 5♠ W +1 ♥5 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
1430 0.50 4.50 6♠ W ♣4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
1430 0.50 4.50 6♠ W 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 2-Jones-Casey
|
27 |
♠AJ9
♥KT32
♦J
♣QT875
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠QT87
♥A4
♦AKT6
♣AK2
|
♠62
♥8765
♦Q52
♣J643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♣7 1-Madison-Rodger vs 6-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 4.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♣4 12-Tatham-Jelusich vs 9-Warner-Gilliam
120 1.50 3.50 2N W ♣7 3-Batko-Walters vs 11-Elad-Brilmyer
120 1.50 3.50 2N W ♣7 7-Boyer-Boyer vs 10-O'Neill-Blake
120 1.50 3.50 2N W ♣7 8-Lane-Matz vs 5-Kantor-Mann
120 1.50 3.50 2N W 4-Zellmer-Oakley vs 2-Jones-Casey
|