Hands and Results
1 |
♠92
♥KJ2
♦A9763
♣QJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠T85
♥65
♦K854
♣AK85
|
♠A74
♥Q974
♦J2
♣7632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♣A 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
150 3.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♥2 7-Yates-Chapman vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♣2 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣A 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
50 0.50 3.50 3♦ N -1 ♣7 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
2 |
♠2
♥AKQT92
♦AT863
♣T
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKJ7
♥43
♦J92
♣A754
|
♠9653
♥J76
♦Q
♣KQJ86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
790 4.00 0.00 4♥* N ♦Q 7-Yates-Chapman vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣K 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♣K 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♣K 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +2 ♣K 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
|
3 |
♠JT7542
♥5
♦AT3
♣K72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠98
♥AK97632
♦95
♣53
|
♠AQ3
♥Q4
♦Q8764
♣J94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥A 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♥A 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥Q 7-Yates-Chapman vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥Q 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ N +1 ♥Q 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
4 |
♠AQJ84
♥J
♦42
♣AJT93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠K
♥T97643
♦QT975
♣2
|
♠962
♥AK82
♦63
♣KQ64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♠ N 7-Yates-Chapman vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥A 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥A 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
500 1.00 3.00 5♥* W -2 ♠A 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
|
5 |
♠J652
♥T5
♦AQ643
♣A6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKQ73
♥AKJ84
♦-
♣T93
|
♠T84
♥Q96
♦K8
♣Q8542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3/4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠9 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥T 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♠9 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 7-Yates-Chapman vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♦J 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
|
6 |
♠8
♥AQ7542
♦Q98
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AJT742
♥J8
♦AK53
♣4
|
♠K93
♥K3
♦JT62
♣A953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♠ W -1 ♣Q 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣Q 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣Q 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♠8 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
650 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 7-Yates-Chapman vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
|
7 |
♠Q976
♥K753
♦842
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AK53
♥A64
♦J3
♣JT43
|
♠T82
♥T82
♦765
♣A762
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♣J 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♠3 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
150 3.00 1.00 1N S +2 ♣3 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♠T 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ S +1 ♠A 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Yates-Chapman
|
8 |
♠T974
♥J97
♦KT65
♣J5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠J5
♥QT8643
♦Q82
♣Q2
|
♠AK83
♥5
♦AJ4
♣98764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♣J 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 ♠T 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Yates-Chapman
100 3.00 1.00 2♥ W -2 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
90 1.00 3.00 1N S ♥6 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
50 0.00 4.00 2♥ W -1 ♠T 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
|
9 |
♠AT9
♥AQ6
♦AQJT
♣963
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠K63
♥843
♦853
♣J875
|
♠8542
♥KT
♦9642
♣KQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠8 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♣K 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♣K 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♣K 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 7-Yates-Chapman
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ N ♣K 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
|
10 |
♠J984
♥JT2
♦Q43
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AK5
♥K854
♦62
♣Q873
|
♠62
♥A763
♦KJ97
♣952
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ N ♣8 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♠7 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♠2 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♥A 7-Yates-Chapman vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♠7 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
11 |
♠4
♥KQJ85
♦T43
♣AK84
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AQ975
♥64
♦QJ8
♣T62
|
♠KJ82
♥T32
♦652
♣QJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠K 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 7-Yates-Chapman vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠2 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♥4 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
12 |
♠QT
♥AQJ9843
♦A4
♣K2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠J874
♥K2
♦32
♣A8743
|
♠K9653
♥T5
♦QJT5
♣65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 ♦Q 7-Yates-Chapman vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
680 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +2 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♦Q 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♦Q 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♦Q 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
|
13 |
♠T42
♥J983
♦KT74
♣T7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠Q753
♥7
♦983
♣AKJ42
|
♠KJ6
♥A2
♦AQJ62
♣986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥K 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ W +2 ♥3 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
170 1.00 3.00 3♣ E +3 ♥K 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +2 ♥K 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 7-Yates-Chapman
|
14 |
♠AJ7
♥T52
♦KT2
♣Q863
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠KQT65
♥AQ74
♦A
♣AK5
|
♠432
♥J86
♦QJ753
♣T2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣2 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥2 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥T 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 7-Yates-Chapman
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥T 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣3 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
|
15 |
♠AQ974
♥K74
♦Q32
♣Q5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠653
♥AQ63
♦KJT
♣873
|
♠J82
♥T982
♦987
♣T62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥3 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♠6 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♣8 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 7-Yates-Chapman
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ N +1 ♦8 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
|
16 |
♠J85
♥AQJ3
♦-
♣KJ8632
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠32
♥K9862
♦KQ9762
♣-
|
♠AT97
♥74
♦A53
♣AQ94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3/2♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♣3 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 3N E -2 ♣5 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
200 3.00 1.00 5♦ W -2 ♠5 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 7-Yates-Chapman
200 3.00 1.00 5♦ W -2 ♣6 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ N +1 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 ♦K 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
|
17 |
♠T98
♥97
♦QJ982
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AK54
♥Q43
♦A7
♣KT96
|
♠QJ73
♥A82
♦K63
♣875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦Q 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 7-Yates-Chapman
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 ♦Q 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
50 2.50 1.50 3N W -1 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
50 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♥9 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♠T 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
|
18 |
♠KQT542
♥Q9
♦AT5
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠J3
♥AJT87
♦Q83
♣AK5
|
♠876
♥632
♦J76
♣9763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♣K 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥6 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
620 2.50 1.50 4♠ N ♥2 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 7-Yates-Chapman
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ N +2 ♥2 9-Goldberg-Katz vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ N +2 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
|
19 |
♠KT753
♥A3
♦AQT5
♣43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠9
♥T652
♦843
♣AQ765
|
♠AQ642
♥Q97
♦K96
♣J2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣7/6 ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 4.00 0.00 2♠* N ♣J 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
120 3.00 1.00 2N S ♣6 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♣J 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 7-Yates-Chapman
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♣J 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
|
20 |
♠A75
♥A73
♦AJ8
♣QJ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KQT2
♥Q82
♦953
♣A75
|
♠943
♥K95
♦KQT72
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N N ♦K 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
90 3.50 0.50 1N N ♦7 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
100 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♦K 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
200 0.50 3.50 1N N -2 ♦Q 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 7-Yates-Chapman
200 0.50 3.50 1N N -2 ♦Q 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
21 |
♠A9763
♥KJ83
♦53
♣53
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠T
♥A74
♦KJ742
♣QJT4
|
♠J842
♥Q952
♦86
♣A72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦8 1-Spinner-Wagner vs 7-Yates-Chapman
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦8 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣Q 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ N -1 ♦8 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 5-Harel-Hilbert
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♦4 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
|
22 |
♠872
♥AK32
♦AJ4
♣Q43
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT65
♥JT986
♦-
♣T985
|
♠KQ93
♥74
♦86532
♣K7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♠K 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♥J 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ S ♥J 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
110 1.50 2.50 3♦ S ♥J 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 7-Yates-Chapman vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
|
23 |
♠Q963
♥KJT4
♦Q92
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A
♥Q
♦A8653
♣AKQJ93
|
♠8742
♥A98632
♦T7
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠J 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ W +1 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +2 ♣4 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
600 0.50 3.50 5♣ W ♠3 7-Yates-Chapman vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
600 0.50 3.50 5♣ W ♠3 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
|
24 |
♠97643
♥76
♦K95
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠QT52
♥J832
♦T
♣AKQ2
|
♠J8
♥Q54
♦AQ732
♣976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
50 3.50 0.50 2♥ E -1 ♠K 4-Klayman-Woodworth vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♠4 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
120 1.00 3.00 1N E +1 7-Yates-Chapman vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
150 0.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♥K 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 6-Chaisson-Lamoise
|
25 |
♠8654
♥7643
♦8
♣KQT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT73
♥K
♦QJ753
♣982
|
♠KQJ92
♥AQ5
♦AK4
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 2♣ 7/6♦ 1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 4.00 0.00 4♠ E +3 ♣5 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
1460 2.00 2.00 6♠ E +1 ♥J 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 7-Yates-Chapman
1460 2.00 2.00 6♠ E +1 ♦T 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
1460 2.00 2.00 6♠ E +1 ♣7 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
2210 0.00 4.00 7♠ E ♥J 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
|
26 |
♠763
♥Q964
♦J4
♣T543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AQT954
♥T85
♦K93
♣6
|
♠KJ2
♥AK7
♦A6
♣AK987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.00 0.00 6♠ E ♦7 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
1460 2.50 1.50 6♠ W +1 ♠3 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
1460 2.50 1.50 6♠ W +1 ♦J 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
1470 1.00 3.00 6N E +1 ♦7 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
2210 0.00 4.00 7♠ W ♦J 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 7-Yates-Chapman
|
27 |
♠KQ2
♥A5
♦T643
♣Q853
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠JT983
♥T986
♦J98
♣J
|
♠A65
♥QJ72
♦AKQ52
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5/3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 4♣ S ♦8 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 9-Goldberg-Katz
50 3.00 1.00 5♦ E -1 ♠7 6-Chaisson-Lamoise vs 2-Zeiger-Gleiberman
100 2.00 2.00 5♣* S -1 ♠J 5-Harel-Hilbert vs 4-Klayman-Woodworth
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W ♣3 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 1-Spinner-Wagner
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♣Q 10-Jones-Jelusich vs 7-Yates-Chapman
|