Hands and Results
1 |
♠9872
♥T53
♦QJ6
♣T92
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AQ3
♥AKQ72
♦532
♣A5
|
♠KT
♥984
♦T984
♣KQ74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♦Q 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♥5 4-Loh-House vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♥5 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♥3 10-Rubin-Lane vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
1100 0.00 4.00 4♠* N -5 ♥9 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
|
2 |
♠QT842
♥962
♦8732
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠K953
♥JT
♦A
♣K75432
|
♠AJ7
♥A843
♦K54
♣AQ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 4♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N E +2 ♦Q 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
460 3.50 0.50 3N E +2 ♦Q 10-Rubin-Lane vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
490 2.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♦Q 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
920 0.50 3.50 6♣ E ♦Q 4-Loh-House vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
920 0.50 3.50 6♣ E ♦Q 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
|
3 |
♠J985432
♥KJ62
♦Q
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠QT7
♥98
♦652
♣KJ973
|
♠A
♥QT7543
♦A98
♣Q52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥5 10-Rubin-Lane vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥7 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣2 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♥9 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
50 0.00 4.00 5♠ N -1 ♣2 4-Loh-House vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
|
4 |
♠74
♥AKT965
♦Q95
♣A3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KT98
♥32
♦JT743
♣J8
|
♠J652
♥QJ87
♦AK8
♣Q7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 4NT ♦5 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +3 ♠8 10-Rubin-Lane vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N ♦A 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ N 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♦A 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
200 0.00 4.00 3♥* N -1 ♦A 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 4-Loh-House
|
5 |
♠Q432
♥K876
♦Q6
♣AT9
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT976
♥T3
♦J8
♣QJ62
|
♠A5
♥AQ52
♦K7543
♣75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 2/1♠ ♦7/6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N W -3 10-Rubin-Lane vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♣3 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ W ♥5 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♦T 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 4-Loh-House
|
6 |
♠AJ864
♥AQT95
♦4
♣QJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠T73
♥K32
♦KT73
♣543
|
♠K952
♥876
♦J5
♣K982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 ♣2 10-Rubin-Lane vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
460 2.50 1.50 3N S +2 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 4-Loh-House
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
450 1.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
430 0.00 4.00 3N S +1 ♣3 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
|
7 |
♠T76
♥AK
♦AJ95
♣Q953
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠AQJ52
♥53
♦KQ
♣AJ82
|
♠94
♥T986
♦T863
♣T64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ -/1♦ 2/3♥ -/1NT ♣6/7 ♦6/7 ♠6 NT6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 3♣* W -2 ♥A 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♥K 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
100 1.50 2.50 1♠ W -1 ♥A 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
100 1.50 2.50 1♠ W -1 ♥K 10-Rubin-Lane vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ W +1 ♥K 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 4-Loh-House
|
8 |
♠62
♥93
♦K874
♣A9874
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AJT
♥KQJT42
♦AJ9
♣J
|
♠Q54
♥865
♦T632
♣KQ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♠6 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♠6 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 4-Loh-House
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♠6 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♠6 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ W +1 ♠6 10-Rubin-Lane vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
|
9 |
♠J8
♥AK4
♦AT743
♣874
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠72
♥52
♦Q865
♣AJ965
|
♠AT9
♥QT9863
♦J2
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S ♦4 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
420 2.50 1.50 4♠ S 10-Rubin-Lane vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
120 1.00 3.00 2N N ♥8 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥5 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 4-Loh-House
|
10 |
♠Q8543
♥7
♦A963
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠J2
♥Q94
♦KJT542
♣63
|
♠A976
♥T653
♦Q7
♣K52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠6 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
600 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠6 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
150 2.00 2.00 3♣ N +2 ♦2 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥T 10-Rubin-Lane vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
200 0.50 3.50 5♣ S -2 ♦J 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 4-Loh-House
|
11 |
♠K3
♥QT92
♦4
♣AKQ862
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AQJT96
♥J84
♦AK6
♣J
|
♠874
♥63
♦QJT932
♣T7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♥* S ♦A 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 4-Loh-House
400 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♠4 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
400 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♦Q 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ S +1 ♣J 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ W ♥2 10-Rubin-Lane vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
|
12 |
♠Q92
♥T742
♦KT9
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠AJ73
♥KQJ83
♦5
♣JT3
|
♠K85
♥96
♦A62
♣K9854
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2/3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 4♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N W -2 ♦4 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 4-Loh-House
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -2 ♦Q 10-Rubin-Lane vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♦Q 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ W +2 ♠2 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ W +2 ♠2 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
|
13 |
♠7652
♥KQ76
♦K532
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠JT83
♥83
♦A98
♣A987
|
♠AK4
♥AJ
♦JT6
♣KQ654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♠ W -2 ♥K 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
630 2.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥T 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
630 2.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♥3 4-Loh-House vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
660 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♥4 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
660 0.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♥4 10-Rubin-Lane vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
|
14 |
♠QT9
♥65
♦QJT2
♣KT72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠AKJ632
♥JT92
♦94
♣Q
|
♠85
♥43
♦A8753
♣AJ98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♥6 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♥6 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
140 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♥6 10-Rubin-Lane vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
200 0.50 3.50 3♦ N -4 ♠8 4-Loh-House vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
200 0.50 3.50 3♣ S -4 ♠A 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
|
15 |
♠KT832
♥92
♦QT3
♣J52
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q
♥AKJ63
♦2
♣AKQT76
|
♠J96
♥874
♦A985
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣1 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♥ 5NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 3.50 0.50 3♥ W +3 ♦3 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
230 3.50 0.50 1♥ W +5 ♦3 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +2 ♠3 4-Loh-House vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
480 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +2 ♣9 10-Rubin-Lane vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ W ♠3 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
|
16 |
♠KQ53
♥K94
♦53
♣J942
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠JT76
♥J3
♦KJ8
♣T753
|
♠A9
♥A65
♦AQ9642
♣K6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♥7 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ E ♥7 10-Rubin-Lane vs 4-Loh-House
120 1.50 2.50 2N E ♥7 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
120 1.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♥7 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
150 0.00 4.00 4♦ E +1 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
|
17 |
♠T9
♥QT86
♦A654
♣853
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠K85
♥AJ952
♦T7
♣J97
|
♠AJ63
♥743
♦QJ2
♣AKQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♣2 10-Rubin-Lane vs 4-Loh-House
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♥K 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -2 ♣T 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
50 0.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♠6 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
50 0.50 3.50 3N E -1 ♠2 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
|
18 |
♠KT642
♥K865
♦KQ
♣64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠A85
♥AJ
♦J974
♣9832
|
♠J93
♥743
♦65
♣AQJT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ S ♣A 10-Rubin-Lane vs 4-Loh-House
620 3.50 0.50 4♥ N ♥7 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ N 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ E -2 ♠Q 9-Hill-Lawrence vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ E -1 ♠Q 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
|
19 |
♠3
♥-
♦KQT87642
♣K952
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AQ9642
♥K86
♦J
♣AQ3
|
♠JT75
♥QT43
♦A5
♣864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 3♦ ♣6/7 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣4/6 ♦3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♠* W -2 ♦K 10-Rubin-Lane vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
300 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -3 ♦K 4-Loh-House vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
100 2.00 2.00 5♠ W -1 ♦K 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 ♠J 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
300 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -2 ♠J 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
|
20 |
♠K5
♥KJ863
♦AQJ4
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠AJ72
♥T
♦T953
♣T854
|
♠83
♥AQ742
♦K62
♣J32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♣6 4-Loh-House vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
150 3.00 1.00 2N N +1 ♠8 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♠8 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
100 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣3 10-Rubin-Lane vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
100 0.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣2 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
|
21 |
♠A94
♥JT953
♦QJ82
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠QJ7
♥84
♦965
♣QT654
|
♠K8632
♥K7
♦A
♣K9872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ N +2 ♠6 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ N +2 ♠2 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +2 ♠Q 4-Loh-House vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
100 1.00 3.00 4♠* E -1 ♠3 10-Rubin-Lane vs 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman
50 0.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 ♠9 1-Hastie-Klayman vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
|
22 |
♠JT
♥K62
♦AJ72
♣KT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQ73
♥JT5
♦T985
♣93
|
♠A962
♥873
♦K6
♣AQ72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ W ♠J 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ W ♣5 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♠J 4-Loh-House vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♠J 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +1 ♥2 10-Rubin-Lane vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|
23 |
♠T873
♥874
♦QT75
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A92
♥JT32
♦A63
♣762
|
♠J64
♥6
♦KJ842
♣AJT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠2 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♠A 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♦A 4-Loh-House vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣7 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
100 1.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♠A 10-Rubin-Lane vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|
24 |
♠QJT
♥A87
♦T84
♣AQJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠A4
♥T65432
♦J62
♣62
|
♠K82
♥K9
♦KQ53
♣T875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣6 10-Rubin-Lane vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ S ♦8 7-Flaherty-Busby vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ S ♦2 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 8-Tatham-Veinbergs
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♦K 4-Loh-House vs 3-Pottenger-Agelidis
|
25 |
♠KJT82
♥65
♦K86
♣KT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠4
♥JT987
♦Q9732
♣Q3
|
♠Q7653
♥K32
♦-
♣AJ972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3/2♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥J 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
50 2.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♥J 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
50 2.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♥J 10-Rubin-Lane vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
100 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 4-Loh-House
|
26 |
♠AQ54
♥J96
♦AT3
♣942
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠K63
♥AQT5
♦QJ
♣KQ63
|
♠J982
♥87
♦K8
♣AJT75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 4-Loh-House
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♠5 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♣9 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
600 1.50 2.50 3N W 10-Rubin-Lane vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
600 1.50 2.50 3N E 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
|
27 |
♠2
♥AJ9872
♦A97
♣T93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠96
♥K643
♦K54
♣A762
|
♠KT83
♥Q
♦JT8
♣KQJ85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S ♥2 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S 10-Rubin-Lane vs 7-Flaherty-Busby
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♠9 3-Pottenger-Agelidis vs 9-Hill-Lawrence
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♠9 8-Tatham-Veinbergs vs 1-Hastie-Klayman
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥T 5-Zeiger-Gleiberman vs 4-Loh-House
|