Hands and Results
1 |
♠KT43
♥K2
♦AQT
♣A532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠A865
♥AQ8
♦9642
♣87
|
♠Q97
♥JT954
♦753
♣K4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 5-Rea-Janecki
150 3.00 1.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 7-Findley-Findley
120 2.00 2.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
110 1.00 3.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
50 0.00 4.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
|
2 |
♠J5
♥952
♦AK3
♣AK832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠A73
♥J43
♦QT72
♣Q74
|
♠86
♥AKQ7
♦98654
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
110 3.00 1.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
100 1.50 2.50 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 5-Rea-Janecki
100 1.50 2.50 8-Landres-Landres vs 7-Findley-Findley
200 0.00 4.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
3 |
♠J9632
♥AJ2
♦J64
♣76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKQ5
♥T984
♦Q98
♣83
|
♠84
♥KQ7653
♦K53
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 1/-♠ ♣5/4 ♦6 ♠7/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
100 3.00 1.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
200 2.00 2.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 5-Rea-Janecki
620 1.00 3.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 7-Findley-Findley
650 0.00 4.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
4 |
♠J65
♥K875
♦7
♣J8643
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠K
♥JT92
♦AQJ8
♣AKQ2
|
♠A972
♥Q64
♦K9653
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 4-Morris-White
600 3.00 1.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
620 2.00 2.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
630 0.50 3.50 2-Hermann-Weller vs 2-Burlison-Neal
630 0.50 3.50 8-Landres-Landres vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
|
5 |
♠A9
♥9843
♦T4
♣QJT86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠KQ8653
♥5
♦AQ62
♣92
|
♠JT42
♥KJ7
♦KJ9
♣743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣2/1 ♦6 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 4-Morris-White
140 3.00 1.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 2-Burlison-Neal
110 2.00 2.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
140 1.00 3.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
170 0.00 4.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
|
6 |
♠965
♥QJ75
♦T532
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠QT3
♥T8
♦AQ86
♣AQ84
|
♠AJ2
♥AK963
♦9
♣7632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 6/5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 2-Hermann-Weller vs 2-Burlison-Neal
100 3.25 0.75 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 4-Morris-White
600 1.38 2.63 1-Richard-Kellers vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
630 0.13 3.88 8-Landres-Landres vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
|
7 |
♠AJ2
♥AKT
♦75
♣AT863
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠QT865
♥862
♦QT92
♣J
|
♠K
♥QJ753
♦KJ
♣97542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 2-Hermann-Weller vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
150 3.50 0.50 8-Landres-Landres vs 5-Rea-Janecki
120 2.00 2.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 2-Burlison-Neal
110 1.00 3.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 0.00 4.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 7-Findley-Findley
|
8 |
♠KQ875
♥KQJ94
♦-
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AT2
♥T875
♦J93
♣K94
|
♠94
♥632
♦AKQT
♣A852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 1.50 1-Richard-Kellers vs 7-Findley-Findley
170 2.50 1.50 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
170 2.50 1.50 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 2-Burlison-Neal
170 2.50 1.50 8-Landres-Landres vs 5-Rea-Janecki
140 0.00 4.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
|
9 |
♠A87643
♥Q3
♦T94
♣93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠92
♥4
♦A632
♣Q87654
|
♠KJ5
♥T9852
♦J85
♣K2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3/2 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 2-Burlison-Neal
140 3.00 1.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 1.00 3.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 7-Findley-Findley
100 1.00 3.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
100 1.00 3.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 5-Rea-Janecki
|
10 |
♠75
♥Q8732
♦AQ95
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠A984
♥T654
♦K8
♣J63
|
♠QT632
♥-
♦J2
♣AKT874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ 4♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♠ ♦2/4 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
130 3.00 1.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 4-Morris-White
200 2.00 2.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
230 1.00 3.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
620 0.00 4.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 2-Burlison-Neal
|
11 |
♠943
♥98
♦J94
♣KQJT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠Q
♥A753
♦KT873
♣853
|
♠KJ765
♥KJ6
♦Q6
♣A96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2/1♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
50 3.00 1.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 2-Burlison-Neal
140 1.50 2.50 1-Richard-Kellers vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
140 1.50 2.50 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 4-Morris-White
180 0.00 4.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
12 |
♠Q8
♥AQT
♦Q876
♣KJ32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠943
♥K965
♦AJT
♣AT7
|
♠KT
♥J832
♦432
♣Q864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/3♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
110 3.00 1.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 4-Morris-White
100 1.00 3.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
100 1.00 3.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 2-Burlison-Neal
100 1.00 3.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
13 |
♠JT5
♥K52
♦KT62
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠93
♥Q84
♦AJ83
♣KQ83
|
♠K864
♥T93
♦Q9754
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 4♥ 3/4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
110 3.00 1.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
70 2.00 2.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 4-Morris-White
100 1.00 3.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 7-Findley-Findley
200 0.00 4.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 5-Rea-Janecki
|
14 |
♠KQ32
♥853
♦873
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠AJT65
♥QJT
♦KJ9
♣K7
|
♠8
♥K94
♦AT654
♣9654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 4-Morris-White
50 3.00 1.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
50 3.00 1.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 5-Rea-Janecki
110 1.00 3.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 7-Findley-Findley
150 0.00 4.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
|
15 |
♠6
♥AJ95
♦JT52
♣AKJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠QJT43
♥Q86
♦3
♣QT96
|
♠K87
♥K72
♦K976
♣873
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2/3 ♦1/2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 7-Findley-Findley
150 3.00 1.00 1-Richard-Kellers vs 4-Morris-White
110 2.00 2.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
100 1.00 3.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
90 0.00 4.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 5-Rea-Janecki
|
16 |
♠KJ95
♥52
♦QJ865
♣54
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠T7
♥J
♦AT43
♣AKQ876
|
♠AQ642
♥QT9876
♦2
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 4-Morris-White
200 2.50 1.50 2-Hermann-Weller vs 5-Rea-Janecki
200 2.50 1.50 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
110 1.00 3.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
600 0.00 4.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 2-Burlison-Neal
|
17 |
♠A864
♥85
♦KT973
♣K8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠T973
♥K7
♦QJ8
♣J962
|
♠KQJ52
♥64
♦A42
♣QT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 4-Morris-White
170 3.00 1.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 5-Rea-Janecki
140 2.00 2.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
50 1.00 3.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
100 0.00 4.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 2-Burlison-Neal
|
18 |
♠75
♥32
♦KQ932
♣KQJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠J962
♥T65
♦75
♣8543
|
♠KQ43
♥AQJ84
♦JT
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.00 0.00 2-Hermann-Weller vs 5-Rea-Janecki
110 2.00 2.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
110 2.00 2.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 4-Morris-White
110 2.00 2.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
140 0.00 4.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 2-Burlison-Neal
|
19 |
♠3
♥AJ942
♦QJ76
♣K97
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKJ85
♥K
♦T98
♣JT86
|
♠T92
♥QT73
♦A54
♣A32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
100 3.00 1.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
80 2.00 2.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 1.00 3.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 7-Findley-Findley
110 0.00 4.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 5-Rea-Janecki
|
20 |
♠T9
♥AQJ85
♦A92
♣JT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠K72
♥K6
♦KT73
♣A962
|
♠86
♥T9732
♦J64
♣K74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
140 3.00 1.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
110 2.00 2.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 5-Rea-Janecki
100 1.00 3.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
300 0.00 4.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 7-Findley-Findley
|
21 |
♠AT853
♥T965
♦QJ62
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠J94
♥KQJ8
♦T8
♣9852
|
♠K7
♥72
♦AK954
♣KT73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♥ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥7/6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3-Rose-Sottosanti vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
90 2.00 2.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 1-Thompson-Christensen
90 2.00 2.00 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 7-Findley-Findley
300 0.13 3.88 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 5-Rea-Janecki
|
22 |
♠AJ63
♥KT94
♦T2
♣Q96
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠542
♥AQ6
♦A63
♣T753
|
♠QT7
♥52
♦Q9875
♣AK8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣6 ♦5 NT7/6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 8-Landres-Landres vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
PASS 2.50 1.50 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 7-Findley-Findley
PASS 2.50 1.50 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
50 1.00 3.00 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 2-Burlison-Neal
90 0.00 4.00 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 4-Morris-White
|
23 |
♠-
♥JT654
♦AK943
♣Q74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A6532
♥Q
♦QT76
♣AK9
|
♠KQJT4
♥K73
♦J5
♣653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 6-Fenzel-Clampitt vs 4-Morris-White
100 3.50 0.50 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
620 1.50 2.50 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 2-Burlison-Neal
620 1.50 2.50 8-Landres-Landres vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
650 0.00 4.00 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 7-Findley-Findley
|
24 |
♠9653
♥KQ5
♦K8
♣Q632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T7
♥A96
♦92
♣AKJ954
|
♠A4
♥JT72
♦AJ65
♣T87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 7-Sommers-Richardson vs 6-Purcell-Mathison
140 2.63 1.38 8-Landres-Landres vs 8-Sonnenshein-Polin
50 0.75 3.25 4-Weien-Shakowski vs 7-Findley-Findley
50 0.75 3.25 5-Winkler-Warwick vs 2-Burlison-Neal
|