Hands and Results
1 |
♠A64
♥72
♦AJ86
♣8543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠K
♥KQ83
♦Q2
♣KQT962
|
♠QT9832
♥T9
♦KT97
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Hill-Kellers
50 3.50 0.50 5-Janecki-Rea vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
100 2.00 2.00 4-Mathison-White vs 6-Segal-Purcell
110 1.00 3.00 1-Richard-Morris vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
180 0.00 4.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
|
2 |
♠962
♥A9654
♦Q92
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKT4
♥J
♦65
♣KQJ974
|
♠QJ53
♥KQT72
♦K83
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Hill-Kellers
170 3.00 1.00 5-Janecki-Rea vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
420 1.50 2.50 1-Richard-Morris vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
420 1.50 2.50 4-Mathison-White vs 6-Segal-Purcell
480 0.00 4.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
|
3 |
♠62
♥J32
♦AJ985
♣A86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠KT987
♥76
♦QT
♣7432
|
♠Q4
♥AK98
♦742
♣KQJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 3-Lipp-Rose vs 4-Hill-Kellers
100 3.25 0.75 6-Landres-Landres vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
90 1.38 2.63 1-Richard-Morris vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
110 0.13 3.88 5-Janecki-Rea vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
4 |
♠J4
♥KQ872
♦JT9
♣953
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠Q953
♥JT9
♦7
♣AKJ76
|
♠A76
♥6
♦AK8543
♣Q84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
100 3.00 1.00 5-Janecki-Rea vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
90 2.00 2.00 4-Mathison-White vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
140 1.00 3.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 4-Hill-Kellers
630 0.00 4.00 1-Richard-Morris vs 6-Segal-Purcell
|
5 |
♠K654
♥QJT9532
♦3
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠JT8
♥K8
♦74
♣AKT432
|
♠A732
♥A7
♦KQ98
♣J98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦5 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5/4♣ 2♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 4-Hill-Kellers
140 2.50 1.50 4-Mathison-White vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
140 2.50 1.50 5-Janecki-Rea vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
200 0.50 3.50 1-Richard-Morris vs 6-Segal-Purcell
200 0.50 3.50 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
|
6 |
♠A873
♥K42
♦T9
♣J853
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠9654
♥QJT75
♦872
♣A
|
♠-
♥9863
♦AKJ4
♣K7642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥3/2 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
140 3.50 0.50 5-Janecki-Rea vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
110 2.00 2.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 4-Hill-Kellers
50 0.50 3.50 1-Richard-Morris vs 6-Segal-Purcell
50 0.50 3.50 4-Mathison-White vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
|
7 |
♠T63
♥T642
♦KJ82
♣Q7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠K54
♥93
♦AT7
♣AKJ86
|
♠A87
♥KJ87
♦Q65
♣T53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
120 3.00 1.00 5-Janecki-Rea vs 6-Segal-Purcell
150 1.50 2.50 1-Richard-Morris vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
150 1.50 2.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
600 0.00 4.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
|
8 |
♠J8
♥J962
♦J832
♣A62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AK532
♥AQ5
♦QT9
♣73
|
♠QT94
♥K84
♦A7
♣KQ95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4/3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 1.00 1-Richard-Morris vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
200 3.00 1.00 5-Janecki-Rea vs 6-Segal-Purcell
200 3.00 1.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
450 1.00 3.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
480 0.00 4.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|
9 |
♠AQJ9
♥KT2
♦T4
♣JT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠754
♥Q6543
♦K72
♣Q5
|
♠KT3
♥97
♦QJ985
♣K83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
110 2.50 1.50 1-Richard-Morris vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
110 2.50 1.50 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
PASS 1.00 3.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
100 0.00 4.00 5-Janecki-Rea vs 6-Segal-Purcell
|
10 |
♠A7
♥QJ93
♦AJT632
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠KT8
♥8
♦KQ84
♣KT872
|
♠Q96542
♥76542
♦-
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♠ ♦3/4 ♥5/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 4-Mathison-White vs 4-Hill-Kellers
90 3.00 1.00 1-Richard-Morris vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
170 2.00 2.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
210 1.00 3.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
300 0.00 4.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 6-Segal-Purcell
|
11 |
♠KT52
♥8
♦KQJ982
♣A8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠3
♥AJ974
♦T3
♣QJ763
|
♠A964
♥T6
♦754
♣KT95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 6-Landres-Landres vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
50 1.50 2.50 1-Richard-Morris vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
50 1.50 2.50 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 6-Segal-Purcell
50 1.50 2.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
50 1.50 2.50 4-Mathison-White vs 4-Hill-Kellers
|
12 |
♠A9
♥K
♦QJT9842
♣T32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠T64
♥AQJT9
♦A3
♣K84
|
♠J852
♥83
♦K5
♣QJ975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.63 1.38 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 6-Segal-Purcell
110 2.63 1.38 4-Mathison-White vs 4-Hill-Kellers
110 2.63 1.38 6-Landres-Landres vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
100 0.13 3.88 3-Lipp-Rose vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
|
13 |
♠52
♥T752
♦J765
♣Q65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠K9
♥QJ643
♦KT3
♣732
|
♠AT874
♥A8
♦A98
♣JT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
120 3.50 0.50 5-Janecki-Rea vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
100 2.00 2.00 1-Richard-Morris vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
90 1.00 3.00 4-Mathison-White vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
200 0.00 4.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 4-Hill-Kellers
|
14 |
♠642
♥AT86
♦8
♣KQ973
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠A95
♥KQJ52
♦A5
♣J85
|
♠KJ83
♥43
♦KT632
♣T4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
50 3.50 0.50 5-Janecki-Rea vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
120 2.00 2.00 1-Richard-Morris vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
140 1.00 3.00 4-Mathison-White vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
150 0.00 4.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 4-Hill-Kellers
|
15 |
♠K62
♥Q83
♦K652
♣763
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠8
♥KJ762
♦J9874
♣52
|
♠QJ74
♥A5
♦QT
♣KQJ98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 3-Lipp-Rose vs 1-Sootkoos-Fenzel
100 2.63 1.38 5-Janecki-Rea vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
100 1.38 2.63 4-Mathison-White vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
200 0.13 3.88 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 4-Hill-Kellers
|
16 |
♠J54
♥T42
♦K532
♣AK2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠AQ3
♥KQ86
♦A9
♣T874
|
♠KT876
♥7
♦J76
♣Q653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3/4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5/6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4-Mathison-White vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
100 3.50 0.50 5-Janecki-Rea vs 4-Hill-Kellers
90 2.00 2.00 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
110 0.50 3.50 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
110 0.50 3.50 6-Landres-Landres vs 6-Segal-Purcell
|
17 |
♠AJ87
♥AQ3
♦QJ52
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠KT
♥KJ62
♦T873
♣Q64
|
♠3
♥974
♦9
♣AKJ87532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♦ 4♥ 6♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦0 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.50 0.50 3-Lipp-Rose vs 5-Trumble-Clampitt
480 3.50 0.50 6-Landres-Landres vs 6-Segal-Purcell
450 2.00 2.00 5-Janecki-Rea vs 4-Hill-Kellers
150 1.00 3.00 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
50 0.00 4.00 4-Mathison-White vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
|
18 |
♠J93
♥AT
♦AJ5
♣KT864
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AT874
♥632
♦Q86
♣A9
|
♠Q52
♥QJ87
♦KT43
♣52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.25 0.75 4-Mathison-White vs 2-Birndorf-Marble
110 3.25 0.75 5-Janecki-Rea vs 4-Hill-Kellers
90 1.38 2.63 6-Landres-Landres vs 6-Segal-Purcell
50 0.13 3.88 2-Winkler-Winkler vs 3-Jakobsen-Flores
|