1 |
♠QJ84
♥A54
♦AK52
♣T9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A62
♥QJ87
♦T9
♣A642
|
♠T5
♥T92
♦J643
♣KQ53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 3-Ott-Morell vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥7 4-Vance-Hall vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦T 6-Potter-Taquino vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♥7 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
50 0.50 3.50 2♦ N -1 ♣3 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
|
2 |
♠QJ3
♥2
♦AQJ53
♣AKQ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT874
♥AK86
♦T8
♣J3
|
♠952
♥Q975
♦76
♣T954
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 5♦ 1♥ -/1♠ 2/3NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N N ♠2 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
600 3.50 0.50 5♦ N ♠2 6-Potter-Taquino vs 5-Smith-Smith
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W -4 ♣A 3-Ott-Morell vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +2 ♠2 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
130 0.00 4.00 2♦ N +2 ♥5 4-Vance-Hall vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
|
3 |
♠AQ42
♥QT54
♦AJ5
♣QT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT96
♥J92
♦86
♣9654
|
♠J753
♥A87
♦K92
♣AK2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -4 ♥4 3-Ott-Morell vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
300 3.00 1.00 2♣ E -3 ♦4 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♠3 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
50 1.00 3.00 3♦ S -1 ♠6 6-Potter-Taquino vs 5-Smith-Smith
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ W ♥4 4-Vance-Hall vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
|
4 |
♠A96
♥5
♦Q9542
♣AJT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K8432
♥T964
♦JT
♣Q6
|
♠-
♥KQJ73
♦A86
♣97432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6/5♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6/5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥4 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S ♥9 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ N ♣2 2-Glover-Poels vs 2-Meyers-Yost
200 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥4 4-Vance-Hall vs 5-Smith-Smith
500 0.00 4.00 4♠* S -2 ♥4 6-Potter-Taquino vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
|
5 |
♠A8762
♥J6
♦JT97
♣T3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K3
♥Q83
♦Q64
♣K8762
|
♠T95
♥T952
♦K5
♣QJ54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 2♣ N ♠A 2-Glover-Poels vs 2-Meyers-Yost
100 3.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♣6 6-Potter-Taquino vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -2 ♣K 4-Vance-Hall vs 5-Smith-Smith
300 0.50 3.50 3N S -3 ♣6 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
300 0.50 3.50 3N N -3 ♣2 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
|
6 |
♠KQ4
♥A
♦JT975
♣J632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A652
♥Q9
♦AK
♣KQT75
|
♠J
♥K876432
♦4
♣A984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣1 ♥2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5/4♥ 4NT ♦3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♦3 2-Glover-Poels vs 2-Meyers-Yost
100 3.00 1.00 5♦* N -1 ♣Q 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠T 6-Potter-Taquino vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠8 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♦3 4-Vance-Hall vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
7 |
♠J72
♥J93
♦AQ74
♣J52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q98
♥KQ5
♦98
♣98643
|
♠KT63
♥A762
♦2
♣AKQT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 4♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 2N W -4 ♦4 6-Potter-Taquino vs 2-Meyers-Yost
200 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♦6 3-Ott-Morell vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
100 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♣2 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♦6 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
150 0.50 3.50 2♣ E +3 ♣2 2-Glover-Poels vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
|
8 |
♠J9654
♥A6
♦53
♣K762
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠87
♥KT9
♦AJ9
♣A9543
|
♠KQT
♥Q842
♦876
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 ♦5 3-Ott-Morell vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♦4 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♦Q 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♣J 6-Potter-Taquino vs 2-Meyers-Yost
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E ♣J 2-Glover-Poels vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
|
9 |
♠97
♥QT86
♦AT
♣T8753
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KT4
♥AK4
♦QJ95
♣K62
|
♠QJ8632
♥32
♦742
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ 1/-NT ♣5 ♥4 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ E -1 ♥5 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
100 2.63 1.38 3♠ E -1 ♥5 3-Ott-Morell vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
100 2.63 1.38 3♠ E -1 ♦5 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Smith-Smith
AVE- AVE+ 1.60 2.40 2-Glover-Poels vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ W +1 ♥6 6-Potter-Taquino vs 2-Meyers-Yost
|
10 |
♠AQT53
♥93
♦AQ95
♣K5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ962
♥Q4
♦T82
♣J96
|
♠8
♥AKT5
♦K6
♣T87432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 |
EW: 2/3♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♠5 4-Vance-Hall vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ N ♦Q 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ N ♥A 6-Potter-Taquino vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♠8 3-Ott-Morell vs 2-Meyers-Yost
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ N ♣4 2-Glover-Poels vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
|
11 |
♠K43
♥63
♦976
♣QJT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠65
♥KJT82
♦K53
♣K97
|
♠AQT98
♥A54
♦J4
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣Q 3-Ott-Morell vs 2-Meyers-Yost
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣6 2-Glover-Poels vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦9 6-Potter-Taquino vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
150 1.00 3.00 1N N -3 ♠9 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♦9 4-Vance-Hall vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
|
12 |
♠KQJ63
♥T5
♦J4
♣7532
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠974
♥74
♦AQ952
♣T96
|
♠52
♥AKQ983
♦63
♣AKJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♦7 3-Ott-Morell vs 2-Meyers-Yost
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♦7 4-Vance-Hall vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ E +2 ♥2 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
170 2.50 1.50 1♥ E +3 ♠A 2-Glover-Poels vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ E +2 ♣4 6-Potter-Taquino vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
|
13 |
♠KQ984
♥AK2
♦T842
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ76
♥9
♦K75
♣QJ652
|
♠5
♥Q87543
♦QJ9
♣K98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♦Q 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Meyers-Yost
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♦Q 3-Ott-Morell vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♣Q 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 5-Smith-Smith
80 1.00 3.00 1♠ N ♥5 2-Glover-Poels vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 4-Vance-Hall vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
|
14 |
♠KJ4
♥K875
♦Q7
♣QT72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠95
♥J43
♦AT965
♣A84
|
♠T82
♥AQT96
♦K32
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ S ♥3 3-Ott-Morell vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
110 3.50 0.50 2♣ N +1 ♦2 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 5-Smith-Smith
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 4-Vance-Hall vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥Q 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Meyers-Yost
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♣9 2-Glover-Poels vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
|
15 |
♠K74
♥2
♦AQ752
♣JT75
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AT865
♥J85
♦JT6
♣K8
|
♠J93
♥AQ976
♦4
♣Q962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.25 0.75 3♦ S ♠A 4-Vance-Hall vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
110 3.25 0.75 3♦ S ♥9 1-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Meyers-Yost
AVE- AVE+ 1.60 2.40 2-Glover-Poels vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
50 1.38 2.63 2♥ E -1 ♦3 3-Ott-Morell vs 1-Bahmanian-O'Hara
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ W ♦5 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
16 |
♠T
♥AQ9
♦T9642
♣A982
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KJ752
♥K8
♦J7
♣QT54
|
♠A94
♥762
♦KQ853
♣76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -3 ♥A 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠5 6-Potter-Taquino vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦7 3-Ott-Morell vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♠7 2-Glover-Poels vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
100 0.00 4.00 2♠ W -1 ♥9 4-Vance-Hall vs 2-Meyers-Yost
|
17 |
♠J8543
♥542
♦A82
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QT97
♥9
♦QJ653
♣KJ9
|
♠62
♥KQJ
♦KT97
♣AQ65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
570 4.00 0.00 2♥* S +1 ♦Q 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ S ♣K 3-Ott-Morell vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ W -1 ♥5 4-Vance-Hall vs 2-Meyers-Yost
50 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -1 ♣9 6-Potter-Taquino vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
150 0.00 4.00 1N E +2 ♠A 2-Glover-Poels vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
|
18 |
♠A42
♥KQT542
♦J76
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ97
♥A63
♦Q93
♣KJ7
|
♠QT8
♥-
♦AK85
♣AQ9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♦ W +4 ♥K 3-Ott-Morell vs 5-Smith-Smith
430 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♥5 4-Vance-Hall vs 2-Meyers-Yost
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 ♥K 5-Pyrz-Michaud vs 4-Mathur-Sandeman
480 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +2 ♣4 6-Potter-Taquino vs 6-Goodsell-Granby
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♠A 2-Glover-Poels vs 3-McKnight-McKnight
|