1 |
♠KQ32
♥Q64
♦-
♣KQJ973
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠97
♥AK9753
♦Q743
♣8
|
♠A64
♥82
♦K9652
♣A62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
140 4.00 0.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
110 2.00 2.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
110 2.00 2.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
110 2.00 2.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
50 0.00 4.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
2 |
♠76
♥T963
♦T85
♣AQ87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT985
♥5
♦K96
♣T632
|
♠AJ
♥Q74
♦AQ42
♣KJ54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT7/6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
100 3.00 1.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 5-Smith-Smith
140 1.50 2.50 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
140 1.50 2.50 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
450 0.00 4.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|
3 |
♠KQ
♥AT4
♦QJ93
♣AK43
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T974
♥632
♦AK752
♣2
|
♠A62
♥875
♦84
♣JT975
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
430 4.00 0.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
180 3.00 1.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
90 2.00 2.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
70 1.00 3.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
50 0.00 4.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
4 |
♠543
♥9
♦T87653
♣T83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠AQ
♥AQ86
♦AQJ2
♣954
|
♠KT72
♥KT72
♦4
♣KQJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 3.00 1.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
620 3.00 1.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
620 3.00 1.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
650 1.00 3.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 5-Smith-Smith
690 0.00 4.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|
5 |
♠AQ854
♥K87
♦K3
♣T32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT3
♥943
♦T852
♣J76
|
♠2
♥JT52
♦AQJ97
♣Q54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 1/-♦ 3/2♥ 5/4♠ 5/2NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 3.50 0.50 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
650 3.50 0.50 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
620 2.00 2.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
170 0.50 3.50 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 0.50 3.50 2-Poels-Glover vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
|
6 |
♠Q543
♥85
♦K53
♣J932
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠-
♥JT764
♦AT8
♣KQT84
|
♠AJ872
♥AQ932
♦J4
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 1♠ 3/2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
650 3.50 0.50 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
650 3.50 0.50 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
680 1.00 3.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 5-Smith-Smith
680 1.00 3.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
680 1.00 3.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
|
7 |
♠98
♥AJ82
♦KJ
♣AKQ74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KT2
♥K5
♦T853
♣JT96
|
♠Q76
♥Q964
♦7642
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
600 4.00 0.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
130 3.00 1.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
100 1.50 2.50 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
100 1.50 2.50 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
200 0.00 4.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
8 |
♠53
♥QT8762
♦KQT9
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A72
♥K4
♦J6
♣AQT752
|
♠KQ864
♥95
♦A52
♣863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♠ 6NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
130 2.50 1.50 2-Poels-Glover vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
130 2.50 1.50 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 5-Smith-Smith
150 1.00 3.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
230 0.00 4.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|
9 |
♠JT5
♥K975
♦2
♣Q7543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A72
♥J8642
♦K6
♣AJ6
|
♠Q4
♥AQ3
♦Q98754
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3/4 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2/1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 4.00 0.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 5-Smith-Smith
50 3.00 1.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
100 2.00 2.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
620 1.00 3.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
650 0.00 4.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|
10 |
♠K83
♥AT63
♦842
♣AQ4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q96
♥K852
♦Q93
♣JT2
|
♠AJ74
♥974
♦J75
♣875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 4.00 0.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
180 3.00 1.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
100 1.50 2.50 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
100 1.50 2.50 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
300 0.00 4.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 5-Smith-Smith
|
11 |
♠T4
♥KQJ752
♦86
♣KT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AKQ82
♥A6
♦AKQ9
♣Q4
|
♠9765
♥T4
♦7532
♣J32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 5♦ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 4.00 0.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
90 2.50 1.50 2-Poels-Glover vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 2.50 1.50 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
170 1.00 3.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
430 0.00 4.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
|
12 |
♠AJ87652
♥98
♦87
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠3
♥QJT5
♦KJ653
♣JT8
|
♠T
♥AK3
♦AQ94
♣97643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
620 4.00 0.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
170 2.50 1.50 2-Poels-Glover vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 2.50 1.50 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
110 1.00 3.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
140 0.00 4.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|
13 |
♠Q982
♥JT85
♦J5
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ63
♥2
♦Q98
♣AJ973
|
♠A5
♥A9764
♦K764
♣T2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
100 3.00 1.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
80 2.00 2.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 5-Smith-Smith
90 1.00 3.00 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
120 0.00 4.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
|
14 |
♠54
♥AKQ4
♦KQ863
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ72
♥J873
♦J
♣JT62
|
♠KT8
♥T96
♦A742
♣A85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ -/1NT ♣6/5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 4.00 0.00 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
90 2.50 1.50 2-Poels-Glover vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
90 2.50 1.50 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 5-Smith-Smith
70 0.50 3.50 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
70 0.50 3.50 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|
15 |
♠K9654
♥T4
♦752
♣K84
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJT8732
♥K9
♦T4
♣T5
|
♠A
♥873
♦Q9
♣AQJ7632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 1/-NT ♣4 ♠5/4 NT7/5 |
EW: 3/2♣ 2♠ ♦2/1 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
200 4.00 0.00 5-Sandstrom-MacKay vs 5-Smith-Smith
170 3.00 1.00 2-Poels-Glover vs 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund
150 1.50 2.50 1-Mudd-Mogilner vs 2-Slizyk-Seidel
150 1.50 2.50 3-McKnight-McKnight vs 1-Potter-Goodsell
100 0.00 4.00 4-Vance-Sandeman vs 3-Granby-Wadhwa
|