1 |
♠J543
♥T9652
♦864
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T9762
♥Q
♦KJ5
♣K984
|
♠K8
♥AJ3
♦AT92
♣J632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣6 1-DeMott-Durham vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
100 3.00 1.00 2N E -2 ♥4 3-Henwood-Allison vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♣5 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
90 1.00 3.00 1♦ E +1 ♣5 2-Robinson-Mays vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♥Q 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 4-Dewey-Bache
|
2 |
♠Q93
♥AT8
♦AQJ9
♣AK9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT7
♥KQJ
♦K3
♣QT643
|
♠K542
♥976542
♦2
♣J5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♠ 5NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦1/2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦2 3-Henwood-Allison vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
180 3.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♠2 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 4-Dewey-Bache
150 1.50 2.50 1N N +2 ♥9 1-DeMott-Durham vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ N +3 ♥5 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
130 0.00 4.00 3♦ S +1 ♥K 2-Robinson-Mays vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
3 |
♠QT83
♥KQJ
♦AJ
♣AKQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ9
♥642
♦98753
♣J7
|
♠752
♥AT
♦Q42
♣T9652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥2 ♠2/3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥A 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣5 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 4-Dewey-Bache
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N 1-DeMott-Durham vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 ♠9 2-Robinson-Mays vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Henwood-Allison vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
|
4 |
♠864
♥KQJ7
♦Q94
♣K87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠75
♥T532
♦A7532
♣J4
|
♠AQJ932
♥A864
♦K
♣Q6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♣5 1-DeMott-Durham vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♣5 3-Henwood-Allison vs 4-Dewey-Bache
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♥9 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♥9 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♣5 2-Robinson-Mays vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
|
5 |
♠85
♥Q872
♦983
♣AQ93
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K74
♥A64
♦K4
♣K8754
|
♠AQT2
♥T95
♦QJ762
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♣ W -3 ♠8 2-Robinson-Mays vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♥3 1-DeMott-Durham vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
50 2.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♥2 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
90 1.00 3.00 1N W ♣9 3-Henwood-Allison vs 4-Dewey-Bache
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ E +1 ♦A 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
6 |
♠AKT93
♥KQT87
♦A5
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠642
♥A4
♦JT98
♣KJ74
|
♠J85
♥96
♦3
♣AT98632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ ♣5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣A 1-DeMott-Durham vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♣8 2-Robinson-Mays vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦2 3-Henwood-Allison vs 4-Dewey-Bache
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♣A 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
130 0.00 4.00 4♦ S ♣K 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
7 |
♠QJ853
♥AQ86
♦K9
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠T4
♥K4
♦AJ75
♣97542
|
♠AK972
♥975
♦T43
♣QJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N S +2 ♦5 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♠K 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N ♣Q 3-Henwood-Allison vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
110 1.00 3.00 1♠ N +1 ♣J 1-DeMott-Durham vs 4-Dewey-Bache
100 0.00 4.00 1♠ S -1 ♣Q 2-Robinson-Mays vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
|
8 |
♠T84
♥A82
♦A973
♣KT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ3
♥74
♦Q42
♣A7654
|
♠AQ97652
♥QT
♦KT65
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5/4♥ ♦5/4 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♦ 4♠ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠K 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥6 3-Henwood-Allison vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥6 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥5 1-DeMott-Durham vs 4-Dewey-Bache
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦9 2-Robinson-Mays vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
|
9 |
♠T5
♥A94
♦QJ432
♣AT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ72
♥QJ5
♦T6
♣9876
|
♠Q84
♥K873
♦975
♣KJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♦ S +1 ♠2 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
90 2.63 1.38 1N N ♥3 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
PASS 0.75 3.25 Pass Out 1-DeMott-Durham vs 4-Dewey-Bache
PASS 0.75 3.25 Pass Out 3-Henwood-Allison vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
10 |
♠Q
♥QJ85
♦QT
♣KQ8642
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ984
♥A9
♦J6
♣A953
|
♠763
♥KT732
♦A932
♣J
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1/2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣6 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ W ♣K 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 4-Dewey-Bache
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♣K 1-DeMott-Durham vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
170 1.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♣K 2-Robinson-Mays vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
200 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -2 ♠7 3-Henwood-Allison vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
|
11 |
♠AJ9
♥AK75
♦T92
♣Q52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠74
♥QJ9
♦743
♣T9643
|
♠K62
♥8643
♦J85
♣AJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥Q 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥9 3-Henwood-Allison vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣4 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 4-Dewey-Bache
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S +2 ♣4 1-DeMott-Durham vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
120 0.00 4.00 2N S ♣4 2-Robinson-Mays vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
|
12 |
♠Q87
♥AJ
♦AK
♣AJT854
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK942
♥72
♦Q76
♣K62
|
♠53
♥KT964
♦T85432
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2NT ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥T 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
600 3.00 1.00 3N N ♦T 1-DeMott-Durham vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ N ♠3 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 4-Dewey-Bache
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ N -2 ♠5 2-Robinson-Mays vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
200 0.50 3.50 5♣ N -2 3-Henwood-Allison vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
|
13 |
♠QJT8
♥KT5
♦T4
♣9865
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠K3
♥A8
♦K987652
♣A7
|
♠942
♥J7432
♦AQ
♣KJ3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 1/-♣ 5♦ 3♥ 1♠ 5NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 1-DeMott-Durham vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
130 3.00 1.00 2♦ W +2 ♠Q 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ W +3 ♠Q 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ W +3 ♣8 2-Robinson-Mays vs 4-Dewey-Bache
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♠T 3-Henwood-Allison vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
|
14 |
♠74
♥Q
♦AQJ863
♣JT53
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J62
♥K4
♦T54
♣K9876
|
♠Q953
♥J98762
♦K2
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 5♦ 2♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣9 1-DeMott-Durham vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣9 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
150 1.50 2.50 3♥ E -3 ♠A 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ N +2 ♣2 2-Robinson-Mays vs 4-Dewey-Bache
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣6 3-Henwood-Allison vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
|
15 |
♠AJ53
♥T82
♦J875
♣Q7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T97
♥K73
♦KQ2
♣K954
|
♠42
♥A64
♦AT3
♣AT832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 1.00 3♣ E +1 ♠6 1-DeMott-Durham vs 2-Johnson-Lussier
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ E +2 ♠K 3-Henwood-Allison vs 1-Halbach-Gozesky
130 3.00 1.00 2♣ E +2 2-Robinson-Mays vs 4-Dewey-Bache
150 0.50 3.50 1N W +2 ♠3 4-Bodeen-Bodeen vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
150 0.50 3.50 1N W +2 ♠3 5-Zitek-Zitek vs 5-Arkinzadeh-Arkinzadeh
|