1 |
♠J83
♥643
♦A96
♣AJ93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T4
♥AKJ8
♦K854
♣QT2
|
♠A72
♥T52
♦QT32
♣875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 6.00 0.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
140 4.00 2.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
140 4.00 2.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
140 4.00 2.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
110 1.50 4.50 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
110 1.50 4.50 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
90 0.00 6.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
|
2 |
♠T2
♥AKQJT74
♦J5
♣74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A9874
♥932
♦T32
♣A5
|
♠Q63
♥865
♦KQ84
♣J62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1/-♠ 1/-NT ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
EW: ♣5/3 ♦5 ♥3/2 ♠6 NT6/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
680 6.00 0.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
650 5.00 1.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
230 4.00 2.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
170 3.00 3.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
140 2.00 4.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
300 0.50 5.50 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
300 0.50 5.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
|
3 |
♠KQJ9753
♥Q7
♦A76
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠2
♥KT9642
♦JT5
♣KT4
|
♠A8
♥AJ
♦K832
♣QJ652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
420 6.00 0.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
140 4.00 2.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
140 4.00 2.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
140 4.00 2.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
50 1.50 4.50 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
50 1.50 4.50 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
110 0.00 6.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
|
4 |
♠QJ
♥532
♦J952
♣9862
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠9852
♥T986
♦T
♣AKT7
|
♠743
♥KJ
♦AKQ873
♣Q4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
120 6.00 0.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
100 5.00 1.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
90 3.50 2.50 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
90 3.50 2.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
110 2.00 4.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
130 1.00 5.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
200 0.00 6.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
|
5 |
♠KQT862
♥T
♦T2
♣KJ42
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠54
♥K53
♦KQ975
♣653
|
♠9
♥AJ9876
♦8643
♣AQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3/2♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
170 6.00 0.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
140 5.00 1.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
100 3.50 2.50 1-Halbach-Weien vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
100 3.50 2.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
170 1.50 4.50 2-Glover-Poels vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
170 1.50 4.50 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
420 0.00 6.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
|
6 |
♠J82
♥T72
♦A9874
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K96
♥KJ63
♦QT6
♣A72
|
♠QT543
♥A85
♦J53
♣43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 6.00 0.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
120 5.00 1.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
110 4.00 2.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
100 3.00 3.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
90 1.50 4.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
90 1.50 4.50 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
90 0.00 6.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
|
7 |
♠A762
♥98
♦T83
♣T964
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ53
♥K75
♦AKJ
♣KQJ
|
♠Q984
♥AQJT6
♦742
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
100 6.00 0.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
620 4.50 1.50 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
620 4.50 1.50 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
650 1.50 4.50 1-Halbach-Weien vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
650 1.50 4.50 2-Glover-Poels vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
650 1.50 4.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
650 1.50 4.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
|
8 |
♠AT72
♥8
♦A65
♣J9853
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠J6
♥7432
♦KT98
♣A74
|
♠K94
♥KT6
♦J43
♣KQ62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦6/7 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
150 6.00 0.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
120 5.00 1.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
110 4.00 2.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
90 2.50 3.50 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
90 2.50 3.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
50 1.00 5.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
90 0.00 6.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
|
9 |
♠942
♥K4
♦Q763
♣AJT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKJT5
♥75
♦KJ4
♣K94
|
♠Q873
♥AJ98
♦AT852
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 7♠ 3/5NT ♣3 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
300 6.00 0.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
620 4.50 1.50 1-Halbach-Weien vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
620 4.50 1.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
650 2.50 3.50 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
650 2.50 3.50 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
680 0.50 5.50 2-Glover-Poels vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
680 0.50 5.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
|
10 |
♠J65
♥AKT7
♦J43
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT97
♥Q9843
♦T8
♣K4
|
♠Q4
♥J62
♦AK92
♣9652
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1/2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
630 6.00 0.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
120 5.00 1.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
100 3.00 3.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
100 3.00 3.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
100 3.00 3.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
200 1.00 5.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
300 0.00 6.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
|
11 |
♠3
♥KQJ52
♦AQT9863
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠K9742
♥76
♦J2
♣AT65
|
♠AQJT
♥A3
♦7
♣KQ9874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 4♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
400 5.50 0.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
400 5.50 0.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
170 4.00 2.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
480 2.00 4.00 2-Glover-Poels vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
480 2.00 4.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
480 2.00 4.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
920 0.00 6.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
|
12 |
♠J87432
♥6
♦8732
♣A9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠96
♥J954
♦JT96
♣T86
|
♠AQ5
♥Q3
♦AQ4
♣KQ743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
110 6.00 0.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
50 4.50 1.50 2-Glover-Poels vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
50 4.50 1.50 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
100 3.00 3.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
120 1.50 4.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
120 1.50 4.50 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
300 0.00 6.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
|
13 |
♠KJ7
♥87632
♦K7
♣985
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠A983
♥AQT9
♦A53
♣J7
|
♠T62
♥J5
♦QJT864
♣T6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
130 4.50 1.50 2-Glover-Poels vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
130 4.50 1.50 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
130 4.50 1.50 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
130 4.50 1.50 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
110 2.00 4.00 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
120 1.00 5.00 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
130 0.00 6.00 1-Halbach-Weien vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
|
14 |
♠T3
♥A987
♦J976
♣A52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AK542
♥J
♦A
♣KQT874
|
♠98
♥KQ543
♦QT5
♣J63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W
50 6.00 0.00 7-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 7-Stephenson-Edney
110 5.00 1.00 3-Potter-Goodsell vs 6-Beaton-Sandstrom
150 3.50 2.50 2-Glover-Poels vs 4-Sandeman-Laws
150 3.50 2.50 5-Michaud-Pyrz vs 3-Gozesky-Mottola
430 2.00 4.00 6-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 5-Cobb-Wolf
460 0.50 5.50 1-Halbach-Weien vs 2-Tourangeau-Schechtman
460 0.50 5.50 4-Finch-Mogilner vs 1-Brady-Tekavec
|