1 |
♠AQ98
♥A82
♦A432
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K7643
♥97
♦Q5
♣T962
|
♠JT2
♥J65
♦JT97
♣K53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5/4♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♦7 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 5-Meyers-Yost
480 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +2 ♣4 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
210 2.00 2.00 2N N +3 ♦J 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
180 1.00 3.00 1N N +3 ♠7 2-McCain-Bache vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♦J 1-VanWart-Glover vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
|
2 |
♠QT43
♥QJ8
♦QJ
♣AK82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A985
♥A62
♦T72
♣QT5
|
♠K72
♥K4
♦K863
♣J943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♦3 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♦3 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 5-Meyers-Yost
120 1.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♦3 2-McCain-Bache vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
120 1.50 2.50 1N N +1 ♦2 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ S ♦T 1-VanWart-Glover vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
|
3 |
♠Q9
♥T75
♦T9732
♣T52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AT7
♥A2
♦K64
♣KJ864
|
♠K542
♥J93
♦AQ8
♣Q93
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2/3♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 4NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♥5 2-McCain-Bache vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣T 1-VanWart-Glover vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦2 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 5-Meyers-Yost
660 1.00 3.00 3N W +2 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♥5 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
|
4 |
♠K9
♥T74
♦T854
♣AQJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ652
♥KQ92
♦KJ3
♣4
|
♠T874
♥AJ53
♦6
♣T987
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 3♦ S ♠3 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
110 3.50 0.50 2♦ S +1 ♣4 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ N -1 ♠4 1-VanWart-Glover vs 5-Meyers-Yost
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♣2 2-McCain-Bache vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
|
5 |
♠J4
♥92
♦AJ2
♣AQJ853
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A972
♥AQJ
♦KT76
♣94
|
♠KT8
♥T86
♦Q9843
♣K2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ N ♠8 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ N ♠8 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ W +1 ♣Q 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ E +1 ♣6 2-McCain-Bache vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
800 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -3 1-VanWart-Glover vs 5-Meyers-Yost
|
6 |
♠97642
♥-
♦76532
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ5
♥QJ52
♦AKT9
♣32
|
♠J83
♥A973
♦8
♣AJ974
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ S ♠2 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♦7 1-VanWart-Glover vs 5-Meyers-Yost
90 1.00 3.00 2♦ W ♠2 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠2 2-McCain-Bache vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
|
7 |
♠4
♥AT53
♦8542
♣AK94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT
♥964
♦KJT963
♣52
|
♠5
♥KQJ872
♦7
♣Q8763
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 7♠ 7NT ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +3 ♦J 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 5-Meyers-Yost
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♥9 1-VanWart-Glover vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
260 0.50 3.50 3♠ S +4 ♦J 2-McCain-Bache vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
260 0.50 3.50 3♠ S +4 ♦4 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
|
8 |
♠AQJ7
♥AQT2
♦2
♣AKT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠T986
♥K9765
♦AJ4
♣6
|
♠43
♥43
♦KQ865
♣8532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♦4 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
180 3.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♦K 2-McCain-Bache vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♥3 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 5-Meyers-Yost
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ N ♠4 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ N ♦5 1-VanWart-Glover vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
|
9 |
♠AQ2
♥AT4
♦AK5
♣T754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K975
♥Q65
♦J98
♣J92
|
♠63
♥K98
♦642
♣AQ863
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.50 0.50 1N N ♣6 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
90 3.50 0.50 2♦ N 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 5-Meyers-Yost
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♦4 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
100 1.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♠5 1-VanWart-Glover vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♠5 2-McCain-Bache vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
|
10 |
♠AJT75
♥4
♦KQ98
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q62
♥JT976
♦52
♣Q73
|
♠K4
♥AKQ53
♦A74
♣KT9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠3 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
100 3.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♠3 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
100 3.00 1.00 5♦* E -1 ♦J 1-VanWart-Glover vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ E ♥3 2-McCain-Bache vs 5-Meyers-Yost
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠2 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
|
11 |
♠8
♥9732
♦Q8753
♣Q52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ6
♥QJ84
♦A
♣AK963
|
♠T973
♥T65
♦KT4
♣874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♣ W -2 ♠8 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 ♣A 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W +1 ♠8 2-McCain-Bache vs 5-Meyers-Yost
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W +1 ♠8 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ W +1 ♦5 1-VanWart-Glover vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
|
12 |
♠J65
♥JT76
♦764
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AK9
♥AKQ92
♦Q
♣KT93
|
♠874
♥843
♦AJ93
♣A54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4/5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 2♦ W +2 ♦Q 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠5 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦7 1-VanWart-Glover vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦4 2-McCain-Bache vs 5-Meyers-Yost
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♦4 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
|
13 |
♠953
♥T9
♦KQ9642
♣54
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ864
♥K8653
♦3
♣KT
|
♠AQ
♥QJ2
♦AT5
♣AQ963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♦ W -4 ♦4 2-McCain-Bache vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ W +1 ♣5 1-VanWart-Glover vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
660 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♣2 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
680 1.00 3.00 4♥ E +2 ♦7 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
690 0.00 4.00 3N E +3 ♦8 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Meyers-Yost
|
14 |
♠J
♥JT9
♦AQJ8
♣AJ865
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠87
♥AQ763
♦94
♣T943
|
♠KQ62
♥K52
♦KT5
♣KQ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -4 ♦4 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Meyers-Yost
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♣5 2-McCain-Bache vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 ♠K 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
570 0.00 4.00 2♥* E +1 ♠5 1-VanWart-Glover vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
|
15 |
♠K86
♥J9
♦AKJ3
♣QT94
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ93
♥A74
♦Q987
♣86
|
♠Q4
♥Q82
♦6542
♣K532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3/2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣2 5-Humphreys-Humphreys vs 5-Meyers-Yost
120 2.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♠2 4-Vance-Jarzembowski vs 3-Eklund-Bucknell
120 2.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♣3 2-McCain-Bache vs 4-Laws-Sandeman
90 1.00 3.00 1N N ♣2 3-Tourangeau-Schechtman vs 1-Mottola-Gozesky
80 0.00 4.00 1♠ N ♦2 1-VanWart-Glover vs 2-Roberts-Yeager
|