1 |
♠9862
♥52
♦K965
♣632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AJ54
♥KJ4
♦Q
♣AT875
|
♠KQ
♥A863
♦T843
♣KJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
420 3.00 1.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 3-Richard-VanWart
430 1.00 3.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
430 1.00 3.00 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
430 1.00 3.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
2 |
♠KJT6
♥852
♦K64
♣T92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠82
♥AK97
♦J95
♣KQJ4
|
♠AQ
♥Q4
♦AT8732
♣A76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 6-Yost-Meyers
170 3.50 0.50 6-Bache-McCain vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
420 1.50 2.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
420 1.50 2.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
430 0.00 4.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 3-Richard-VanWart
|
3 |
♠T65
♥Q98
♦72
♣AK753
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9742
♥K642
♦853
♣T4
|
♠Q8
♥53
♦KQJT64
♣982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.50 0.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
490 3.50 0.50 6-Bache-McCain vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
450 2.00 2.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 6-Yost-Meyers
210 0.50 3.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
210 0.50 3.50 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 3-Richard-VanWart
|
4 |
♠A6
♥Q874
♦A82
♣AK63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K53
♥K953
♦943
♣Q42
|
♠T9
♥AJ62
♦KQT5
♣875
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 4♠ 1/-NT ♥7/6 NT7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
170 3.00 1.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
120 2.00 2.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
100 1.00 3.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 2-Cass-Cass
200 0.00 4.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
5 |
♠AK2
♥KT97
♦K74
♣Q97
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠87
♥AJ42
♦T983
♣KJ3
|
♠QJ965
♥863
♦A5
♣A82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥6/7 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
50 2.50 1.50 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
50 2.50 1.50 6-Bache-McCain vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
200 1.00 3.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 2-Cass-Cass
300 0.00 4.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
6 |
♠AJT8
♥AJ8
♦T4
♣K987
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K975
♥6
♦98653
♣JT6
|
♠Q63
♥K95432
♦KQJ7
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥6/5 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
150 3.00 1.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
80 2.00 2.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
150 1.00 3.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 2-Cass-Cass
200 0.00 4.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
7 |
♠Q843
♥-
♦AKJ9632
♣KQ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AJ752
♥Q932
♦8
♣743
|
♠KT
♥T864
♦Q
♣AJT962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♥ 1♠ ♦2 ♥6/7 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 6-Yost-Meyers
130 2.00 2.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
130 2.00 2.00 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 3-Richard-VanWart
130 2.00 2.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 2-Cass-Cass
100 0.00 4.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
|
8 |
♠KJ86
♥AJ643
♦2
♣J87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ3
♥K72
♦QJ9
♣AQ42
|
♠75
♥85
♦AKT4
♣T9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 NT3 |
EW: 3/4♣ 2♦ 2/3NT ♥5 ♠4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
50 3.50 0.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 3-Richard-VanWart
100 2.00 2.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
150 1.00 3.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 6-Yost-Meyers
210 0.00 4.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 2-Cass-Cass
|
9 |
♠J
♥AKT9
♦98543
♣T93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT64
♥64
♦AKT
♣Q52
|
♠9
♥Q8753
♦J2
♣AK864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 3-Richard-VanWart
100 3.50 0.50 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 6-Yost-Meyers
110 2.00 2.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
180 1.00 3.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 2-Cass-Cass
630 0.00 4.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
|
10 |
♠4
♥AQ6
♦KJ654
♣AT76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKQ3
♥JT854
♦9
♣QJ5
|
♠JT976
♥2
♦QT72
♣843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 2-Cass-Cass
110 3.50 0.50 6-Bache-McCain vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
100 1.50 2.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 3-Richard-VanWart
100 1.50 2.50 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
140 0.00 4.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
11 |
♠AQJ73
♥Q62
♦AJT4
♣T
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠K642
♥T8
♦52
♣J7654
|
♠T95
♥AJ53
♦98
♣AK32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 6-Yost-Meyers
130 3.00 1.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
100 2.00 2.00 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 2-Cass-Cass
50 1.00 3.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 3-Richard-VanWart
150 0.00 4.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
|
12 |
♠Q9
♥J43
♦QT8
♣JT876
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠54
♥A52
♦AKJ94
♣AK2
|
♠AJ82
♥KQT976
♦73
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥0 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 7♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
450 1.50 2.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 3-Richard-VanWart
450 1.50 2.50 2-Collins-Hurley vs 6-Yost-Meyers
450 1.50 2.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 2-Cass-Cass
450 1.50 2.50 6-Bache-McCain vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
|
13 |
♠AQT
♥J9
♦5
♣AQJ9643
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠K96
♥T653
♦AQ87
♣T5
|
♠752
♥AKQ7
♦KJ96
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
110 3.00 1.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
600 2.00 2.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 3-Richard-VanWart
620 0.50 3.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 2-Cass-Cass
620 0.50 3.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
|
14 |
♠54
♥AQ7
♦QJT85
♣973
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠A8
♥J964
♦AK972
♣A4
|
♠K9732
♥K32
♦64
♣K82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 2-Cass-Cass
50 3.00 1.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
50 3.00 1.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
140 1.00 3.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 3-Richard-VanWart
400 0.00 4.00 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
|
15 |
♠AK752
♥A75
♦A87
♣63
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9864
♥6
♦KJ53
♣7542
|
♠JT
♥KQ983
♦QT62
♣J9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
660 3.00 1.00 2-Collins-Hurley vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
240 2.00 2.00 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 3-Richard-VanWart
140 0.50 3.50 1-Lassman-Mottola vs 2-Cass-Cass
140 0.50 3.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 1-Roberts-Yeager
|
16 |
♠AKQJ762
♥J
♦AT95
♣K
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠9
♥KT83
♦J62
♣A9542
|
♠54
♥Q9652
♦Q87
♣QT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 1.50 2-Collins-Hurley vs 3-Richard-VanWart
450 2.50 1.50 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
450 2.50 1.50 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 2-Cass-Cass
450 2.50 1.50 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
200 0.00 4.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
17 |
♠K652
♥742
♦95
♣KQ32
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠AT43
♥AQT8
♦QT763
♣-
|
♠QJ
♥63
♦KJ2
♣AJ9654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦2 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2-Collins-Hurley vs 3-Richard-VanWart
50 3.50 0.50 6-Bache-McCain vs 6-Yost-Meyers
400 1.50 2.50 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 2-Cass-Cass
400 1.50 2.50 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
460 0.00 4.00 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
|
18 |
♠QJ73
♥QT3
♦KQ5
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠5
♥K7642
♦986
♣9742
|
♠AK98642
♥A8
♦-
♣AQ86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣1 ♥4 ♠3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♥ 4♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 6-Bache-McCain vs 6-Yost-Meyers
50 2.50 1.50 2-Collins-Hurley vs 3-Richard-VanWart
50 2.50 1.50 4-Mumenthaler-Eklund vs 2-Cass-Cass
170 1.00 3.00 5-Sandstrom-Mackay vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
420 0.00 4.00 3-Mogilner-Beaton vs 5-Sandeman-Laws
|