1 |
♠A93
♥K853
♦973
♣Q94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠-
♥AQT964
♦AQT
♣AKT5
|
♠876
♥2
♦J86542
♣J62
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦0 ♥1 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 6♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♠A 7-Abelow-Roth vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
50 2.00 1.00 5♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
50 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♣A 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 2-Howard-Williams
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♠A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
2 |
♠AK
♥QJT93
♦QJ2
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT5
♥A8542
♦AT
♣965
|
♠87643
♥76
♦543
♣AT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠8 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 2-Howard-Williams
630 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥4 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
180 0.50 2.50 1N S +3 ♣4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
180 0.50 2.50 1N N +3 7-Abelow-Roth vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
|
3 |
♠KQJ63
♥93
♦QT
♣AJT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T4
♥Q8762
♦KJ762
♣6
|
♠A9
♥KJT5
♦A
♣Q98742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 4♣ E -3 ♠8 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 2-Howard-Williams
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 ♥J 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ N +1 7-Abelow-Roth vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
50 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♦A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
4 |
♠JT7432
♥Q8
♦J53
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠K9865
♥T7653
♦AK
♣K
|
♠AQ
♥942
♦QT74
♣A832
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣7 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
100 2.00 1.00 3♣ S -1 ♦A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♦3 7-Abelow-Roth vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♣Q 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 2-Howard-Williams
|
5 |
♠753
♥AKJ62
♦8543
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QT82
♥Q843
♦J6
♣AK5
|
♠J6
♥9
♦AKQT72
♣J943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 4/3♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 3N W -3 ♥K 7-Abelow-Roth vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
150 2.50 0.50 3N E -3 ♣7 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Howard-Williams
50 1.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♥A 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
460 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥A 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
|
6 |
♠A732
♥872
♦AQJ
♣A95
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K
♥543
♦K976
♣QJT72
|
♠J9864
♥AQ
♦8532
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 3♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 3♥ N +1 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Howard-Williams
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♦8 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♠6 7-Abelow-Roth vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
50 0.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♠6 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
|
7 |
♠J8753
♥AK
♦9
♣KJT52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQT2
♥82
♦QJT4
♣A63
|
♠6
♥T9763
♦AK72
♣Q74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2/3♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♦* W -1 ♦9 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♦A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Howard-Williams
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 7-Abelow-Roth vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
300 0.00 3.00 3♠ N -3 ♦A 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
|
8 |
♠AQT
♥QJT7
♦832
♣T96
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ854
♥K
♦Q9
♣KJ543
|
♠763
♥A8643
♦T65
♣Q2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 7-Abelow-Roth vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 2-Howard-Williams
50 0.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 ♥Q 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
50 0.50 2.50 2♠ W -1 ♥Q 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
|
9 |
♠K4
♥AQJ8
♦AQJ
♣Q543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T85
♥K6543
♦K92
♣97
|
♠J97
♥T972
♦T86
♣AT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 2.83 0.17 3N N +4 ♥T 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
460 0.83 2.17 3N N +2 ♥T 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 7-Abelow-Roth
460 0.83 2.17 3N N +2 ♥T 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
|
10 |
♠KJ73
♥82
♦QT2
♣8742
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠T9
♥AQJ64
♦765
♣KQT
|
♠A54
♥KT5
♦AKJ4
♣953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 6♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.17 0.83 4♥ E +1 ♠4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
650 2.17 0.83 4♥ E +1 ♠2 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
680 0.17 2.83 4♥ E +2 ♠2 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 7-Abelow-Roth
|
11 |
♠Q83
♥AJT2
♦Q74
♣864
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠A542
♥854
♦953
♣QJ5
|
♠K6
♥Q973
♦JT6
♣AK72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♥ ♦5 ♥7/6 ♠5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.17 0.83 2N N -1 ♦J 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 7-Abelow-Roth
50 2.17 0.83 2♦ S -1 ♣Q 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
90 0.17 2.83 1N W ♥J 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
|
12 |
♠K3
♥AJ9873
♦J85
♣T8
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q874
♥T2
♦93
♣QJ942
|
♠AJT96
♥64
♦T64
♣A75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♦ 5/4♥ 5/1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♠4 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 3-Fields-Van Hemert
100 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 ♦A 1-Nuccio-Sullivan vs 7-Abelow-Roth
50 0.17 2.83 3♠ E -1 ♦A 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
|
13 |
♠AK
♥QJT532
♦T76
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠653
♥974
♦KQJ8
♣AKQ
|
♠QT94
♥AK86
♦A92
♣T5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -2 ♥Q 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E ♣9 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
200 1.00 2.00 1♥ N -2 7-Abelow-Roth vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
1700 0.00 3.00 5♥* N -6 2-Howard-Williams vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
14 |
♠8752
♥632
♦A
♣KQT73
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠AKJ3
♥AKT9
♦K52
♣82
|
♠964
♥875
♦Q9763
♣94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT5/6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♣K 7-Abelow-Roth vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
50 2.00 1.00 2N S -1 ♥T 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
90 1.00 2.00 1N W ♣7 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
100 0.00 3.00 3♣* N -1 ♦3 2-Howard-Williams vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
15 |
♠QT97
♥Q
♦52
♣AK9532
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJ42
♥AK432
♦Q8
♣86
|
♠53
♥976
♦K964
♣JT74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 2♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♥6/7 |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ S ♥A 7-Abelow-Roth vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
50 2.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♦5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
100 1.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥A 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
800 0.00 3.00 4♠* N -3 ♥6 2-Howard-Williams vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
16 |
♠KJ9
♥K54
♦T5
♣KJ962
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠872
♥AQ8
♦KQ862
♣84
|
♠T54
♥J73
♦A743
♣A73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♦ W -1 ♥4 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
PASS 1.50 1.50 Pass Out 2-Howard-Williams vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
PASS 1.50 1.50 Pass Out 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
50 0.00 3.00 1N N -1 7-Abelow-Roth vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
|
17 |
♠J976
♥5
♦JT854
♣K84
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠T84
♥QT64
♦K6
♣A762
|
♠AQ5
♥K98732
♦32
♣53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 2♦ E -4 ♣Q 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 7-Abelow-Roth
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ N ♦3 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
140 0.17 2.83 2♥ E +1 ♣Q 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 2-Howard-Williams
|
18 |
♠J974
♥AT54
♦865
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠T8652
♥KQ7
♦K3
♣KQ8
|
♠3
♥J8632
♦T97
♣7632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.83 0.17 3N N +1 ♠3 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 7-Abelow-Roth
150 1.50 1.50 3♦ S +2 ♣K 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 2-Howard-Williams
130 0.17 2.83 2♦ S +2 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
|
19 |
♠AKJ4
♥QT5
♦A93
♣QJT
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠965
♥J6
♦KJ7542
♣52
|
♠32
♥A74
♦QT86
♣9843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♥ 6♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 2.17 0.83 6♠ N 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 2-Howard-Williams
980 2.17 0.83 6♥ S ♥J 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 7-Abelow-Roth
480 0.17 2.83 4♠ N +2 ♠2 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
|
20 |
♠K98
♥T754
♦T762
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT752
♥J6
♦543
♣K97
|
♠A3
♥A983
♦98
♣T5432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3N S -1 ♣7 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 2-Howard-Williams
200 0.83 2.17 3N S -2 ♠6 4-Osborne-Sechriest vs 7-Abelow-Roth
200 0.83 2.17 3N S -2 ♠5 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 5-Loehr-Abramowitz
|
21 |
♠75
♥T6
♦AJT642
♣Q73
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠8
♥AKJ94
♦85
♣J9864
|
♠AJT942
♥Q73
♦9
♣AKT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 6♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♠ E -1 ♣7 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♦K 2-Howard-Williams vs 7-Abelow-Roth
420 0.17 2.83 4♥ W ♦A 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
22 |
♠AT763
♥93
♦AKQ
♣532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJ
♥AKJ87
♦J
♣AK974
|
♠952
♥Q42
♦T7652
♣86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♠ N -1 ♣8 2-Howard-Williams vs 7-Abelow-Roth
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ W +1 ♦A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
140 0.17 2.83 3♥ W ♦A 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
|
23 |
♠975432
♥AK6
♦AJ3
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠-
♥942
♦KT5
♣AQT8652
|
♠JT
♥Q87
♦Q9762
♣K97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.17 0.83 4♠ S ♣A 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
620 2.17 0.83 4♠ N ♣K 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
200 0.17 2.83 6♠ S -2 ♣A 2-Howard-Williams vs 7-Abelow-Roth
|
24 |
♠A832
♥5
♦J543
♣KT62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠5
♥AKJT3
♦QT86
♣A85
|
♠KJ4
♥Q642
♦AK9
♣J74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦3/2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.17 0.83 4♥ W +1 ♠A 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
450 2.17 0.83 4♥ W +1 ♦3 2-Howard-Williams vs 7-Abelow-Roth
480 0.17 2.83 4♥ W +2 ♣2 8-Zeldin-Kunkel vs 6-Dewey-Goodsell
|
25 |
♠863
♥854
♦9
♣QJT764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQ95
♥AT76
♦853
♣K2
|
♠T
♥KJ9
♦AKJT76
♣853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♥ W ♦9 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 2-Howard-Williams
630 0.83 2.17 3N W +1 ♠8 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
630 0.83 2.17 3N W +1 ♣Q 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
|
26 |
♠Q973
♥AQT7
♦JT64
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ86
♥9
♦832
♣QJ874
|
♠T52
♥K86
♦AQ97
♣AT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
730 2.83 0.17 3♥* S ♦3 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 2-Howard-Williams
300 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -3 ♣3 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
100 0.17 2.83 1N E -1 ♥3 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
|
27 |
♠Q954
♥K86
♦QJ72
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠J
♥T43
♦AK9
♣AKQT76
|
♠AT72
♥AQ97
♦T8
♣532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♣ W +4 ♦2 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 2-Howard-Williams
460 0.83 2.17 3N W +2 ♦2 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
460 0.83 2.17 3N E +2 ♠3 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
|
28 |
♠J65
♥AQ84
♦K
♣AQ532
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KQ2
♥T32
♦JT63
♣J86
|
♠AT843
♥K5
♦A875
♣K9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4/3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ E ♥6 3-Fields-Van Hemert vs 1-Nuccio-Sullivan
170 0.83 2.17 3♠ E +1 ♣4 5-Loehr-Abramowitz vs 4-Osborne-Sechriest
170 0.83 2.17 3♠ E +1 ♣4 6-Dewey-Goodsell vs 2-Howard-Williams
|