1 |
♠J9752
♥JT86
♦Q
♣AQ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K63
♥Q754
♦KJ643
♣5
|
♠QT84
♥A9
♦985
♣T432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 0.00 2N S +2 ♥4 6-House-Parker vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
120 2.50 1.50 2N S ♦4 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
120 2.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♦4 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 3-Spinner-Walters
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♦9 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♦5 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
|
2 |
♠Q
♥QJ984
♦862
♣KT93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J853
♥T53
♦973
♣872
|
♠KT764
♥A76
♦QT5
♣AQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +1 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ N ♥A 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
50 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♦K 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
90 1.00 3.00 1N E 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 3-Spinner-Walters
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ S -1 6-House-Parker vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
|
3 |
♠-
♥JT97
♦Q876
♣76432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A754
♥Q863
♦5
♣JT85
|
♠8632
♥AK2
♦KJ3
♣AQ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1/3♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♦ S +3 ♦5 6-House-Parker vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
130 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♣J 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 3-Spinner-Walters
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S ♥5 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
100 0.50 3.50 2♠ S -2 ♦5 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ S -2 ♥3 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
|
4 |
♠K95
♥T762
♦JT7
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q87
♥J85
♦AKQ
♣8752
|
♠JT642
♥KQ3
♦52
♣K63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
670 4.00 0.00 2♥* N ♣3 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♦4 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♦T 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 3-Spinner-Walters
110 1.50 2.50 2♠ E ♦8 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 6-House-Parker
120 0.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♥2 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
|
5 |
♠AQT9
♥AQ7
♦K52
♣A54
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J86543
♥8653
♦4
♣J6
|
♠K2
♥KJ94
♦AQJT
♣K87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣T 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 3-Spinner-Walters
100 3.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♥4 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
200 1.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♦Q 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
200 1.50 2.50 4♣ N -2 ♣7 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 6-House-Parker
500 0.00 4.00 4♣* N -2 ♣7 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
|
6 |
♠9
♥K976543
♦65
♣T54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AQJ85
♥J
♦AK973
♣96
|
♠KT73
♥AQ
♦QJT4
♣AKQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 4♣ 7♦ 2♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 3.00 1.00 6♠ E +1 ♥8 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
1460 3.00 1.00 6♠ E +1 ♥4 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
1460 3.00 1.00 6♠ E +1 ♣3 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 3-Spinner-Walters
1470 1.00 3.00 6N E +1 ♣8 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 6-House-Parker
2220 0.00 4.00 7N E ♥2 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
|
7 |
♠Q632
♥93
♦QJ9862
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT98
♥Q876
♦543
♣Q2
|
♠75
♥KT2
♦K7
♣K87543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣Q 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ N +3 ♠7 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ N +2 ♠7 6-House-Parker vs 3-Spinner-Walters
120 1.00 3.00 1N S +1 ♥4 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
100 0.00 4.00 2♣ W -1 ♥T 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
|
8 |
♠AQ2
♥A9873
♦J4
♣764
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠JT98
♥-
♦AT9752
♣A95
|
♠53
♥QJT654
♦86
♣QJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5/4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥* E -2 ♦K 6-House-Parker vs 3-Spinner-Walters
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣8 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
50 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥Q 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -1 ♦A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -2 ♥Q 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
|
9 |
♠T832
♥Q973
♦K2
♣T76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A9764
♥AK
♦AQ7
♣AJ5
|
♠QJ5
♥8654
♦T94
♣K94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥3 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
600 3.00 1.00 3N W ♥4 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ W +1 ♣6 6-House-Parker vs 3-Spinner-Walters
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠2 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
|
10 |
♠KT82
♥AT87
♦AT95
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q63
♥2
♦J74
♣T98742
|
♠754
♥K64
♦Q63
♣AKQ5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.50 0.50 5♣* E -3 ♥Q 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 6-House-Parker
800 3.50 0.50 5♣* E -3 ♥Q 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣T 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣T 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +1 ♣T 3-Spinner-Walters vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
|
11 |
♠J3
♥QJ975
♦T63
♣T87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KQ52
♥86
♦J5
♣AKQJ9
|
♠T987
♥42
♦A987
♣532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6/5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ W ♥Q 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ W ♥Q 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W 3-Spinner-Walters vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
150 0.00 4.00 2♠ S -3 ♣A 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 6-House-Parker
|
12 |
♠K64
♥KJ9
♦J7
♣AKQ32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠A83
♥Q54
♦AKQ84
♣86
|
♠JT5
♥T732
♦932
♣754
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♣ N +1 ♦2 3-Spinner-Walters vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
100 3.00 1.00 2♦* W -1 ♣A 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
50 2.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♣K 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 6-House-Parker
90 0.50 3.50 1N W ♣A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
90 0.50 3.50 1N W ♣K 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
|
13 |
♠J97
♥J3
♦T83
♣AKJ93
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q86
♥AKT9
♦KQJ
♣QT5
|
♠AK43
♥65
♦A9542
♣64
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2/3♥ 5♠ 2/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣8 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
630 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♣A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 3-Spinner-Walters
690 1.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♠7 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
690 1.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♣K 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 6-House-Parker
690 1.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♣9 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
|
14 |
♠AK742
♥875
♦J82
♣52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠J653
♥4
♦K543
♣KQ98
|
♠QT9
♥AQJT93
♦A6
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ E ♣4 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
450 3.00 1.00 5♥ E ♦7 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 6-House-Parker
460 1.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♦4 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 3-Spinner-Walters
460 1.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♣4 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
490 0.00 4.00 3N W +3 ♠4 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
|
15 |
♠KT72
♥QJ953
♦T8
♣A5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠J
♥T4
♦AQ7543
♣T762
|
♠Q93
♥AK62
♦96
♣Q843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♠J 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 6-House-Parker
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♥T 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♣4 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -2 ♥T 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
300 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -3 ♥T 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 3-Spinner-Walters
|
16 |
♠842
♥J987
♦Q743
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠KQJ9
♥T5
♦AT982
♣AJ
|
♠7653
♥32
♦K5
♣QT654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ S ♠K 3-Spinner-Walters vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ S ♠K 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♠K 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 6-House-Parker
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ E +1 ♥A 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
|
17 |
♠AQJT3
♥-
♦Q864
♣T543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠K9764
♥K87
♦AKT7
♣7
|
♠82
♥QJ54
♦J953
♣KJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣1/2 ♦6 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
550 4.00 0.00 5♣* S ♦K 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ S +2 ♦A 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 6-House-Parker
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ W -2 ♣2 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
100 0.50 3.50 5♣* S -1 ♦K 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
100 0.50 3.50 4♣* S -1 ♦A 3-Spinner-Walters vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
|
18 |
♠Q5432
♥KQ943
♦K3
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠JT
♥52
♦AQJ2
♣AKQJ6
|
♠97
♥JT6
♦9765
♣8753
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♣A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
650 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 3-Spinner-Walters vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
200 0.50 3.50 3♠ S +2 ♣A 9-Hennessy-Tatham vs 6-House-Parker
200 0.50 3.50 2♠ N +3 ♥J 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
|
19 |
♠J43
♥AKJ3
♦Q43
♣A87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T82
♥T654
♦J98
♣Q42
|
♠AK9
♥Q82
♦K62
♣J653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 6-House-Parker vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♣3 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♣3 3-Spinner-Walters vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
120 2.00 2.00 2N N 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
50 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♣3 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
|
20 |
♠AKJ2
♥KQ753
♦5
♣J73
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠93
♥64
♦T984
♣AK654
|
♠76
♥AJT982
♦K762
♣8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♣A 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♣A 6-House-Parker vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
620 3.00 1.00 4♠ S ♣A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣A 3-Spinner-Walters vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -1 ♣K 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
|
21 |
♠JT42
♥AK765
♦65
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠9875
♥JT8
♦KQ32
♣84
|
♠Q6
♥Q92
♦AJT97
♣963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥3 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦A 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦A 1-Chapman-Barkan vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ N ♣3 3-Spinner-Walters vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ N +1 ♦A 6-House-Parker vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♦J 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 5-Mollenkopf-Zari
|
22 |
♠QJ8753
♥85
♦J6543
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠A6
♥JT74
♦K9
♣KT963
|
♠K4
♥AK92
♦QT72
♣AJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 5NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 3-Spinner-Walters
500 2.50 1.50 5♠* N -3 ♥A 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
500 2.50 1.50 4♠* N -3 ♥A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 6-House-Parker
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ E ♦A 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠T 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
|
23 |
♠842
♥KT42
♦T2
♣Q986
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KJ
♥AQ7653
♦AJ54
♣J
|
♠AQ765
♥98
♦93
♣AK72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.50 0.50 3N W ♣5 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
600 3.50 0.50 3N E ♦Q 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 6-House-Parker
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♠3 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ W ♣3 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♦7 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 3-Spinner-Walters
|
24 |
♠AQ9
♥A
♦972
♣AJ8742
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K
♥Q9842
♦AT43
♣Q96
|
♠T8752
♥KT765
♦8
♣T3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥4 |
EW: 2♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥5 7-Forrest-Slaney vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
400 2.50 1.50 3N S ♥5 2-Herzog-Sandford vs 8-Rimer-Donaldson
400 2.50 1.50 5♣ N ♦8 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 6-House-Parker
170 1.00 3.00 2♣ N +4 ♥6 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
100 0.00 4.00 4♦* S -1 ♠K 4-Boyer-Waxler vs 3-Spinner-Walters
|
25 |
♠K97
♥KQ96
♦J986
♣65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠QJT
♥T87532
♦AK4
♣J
|
♠8652
♥AJ4
♦Q53
♣743
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4/3 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥A 6-House-Parker vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
430 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥A 3-Spinner-Walters vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
400 1.50 2.50 3N N ♠6 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
400 1.50 2.50 3N N ♠2 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
50 0.00 4.00 4♣ S -1 ♦A 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
|
26 |
♠AKT43
♥A
♦AJT3
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠J65
♥Q65
♦54
♣KQ974
|
♠Q97
♥K42
♦Q9
♣JT653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 7♦ 5♥ 6♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦0 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1390 4.00 0.00 6♦ N +1 ♣5 3-Spinner-Walters vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
640 3.00 1.00 5♦ S +2 ♣K 6-House-Parker vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣K 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣K 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
190 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +4 ♣5 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
|
27 |
♠9543
♥AQ72
♦T42
♣95
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠KT82
♥J54
♦9753
♣KT
|
♠QJ6
♥T93
♦A8
♣AQ732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N ♥T 6-House-Parker vs 2-Herzog-Sandford
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N ♥3 3-Spinner-Walters vs 9-Hennessy-Tatham
100 2.00 2.00 3♣ E -2 ♦K 5-Mollenkopf-Zari vs 4-Boyer-Waxler
50 1.00 3.00 2♦ S -1 ♣8 8-Rimer-Donaldson vs 1-Chapman-Barkan
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♥T 10-Bedore-Jelusich vs 7-Forrest-Slaney
|