1 |
♠982
♥K3
♦T8
♣KQ9643
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A65
♥A74
♦K764
♣J72
|
♠KQ43
♥QJT6
♦J2
♣AT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.50 0.50 2N W +2 ♦8 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
180 1.50 0.50 1N W +3 ♣K 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
400 0.00 2.00 3N E ♥2 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
|
2 |
♠KT
♥J97
♦K94
♣AKT98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠Q963
♥A86
♦AT63
♣75
|
♠875
♥QT43
♦85
♣Q642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N S ♠3 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
150 0.50 1.50 2N N +1 ♥3 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
150 0.50 1.50 2N N +1 ♥3 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
3 |
♠KQ64
♥K76
♦KT7
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠JT75
♥AQ
♦AJ98
♣Q86
|
♠A2
♥JT985
♦Q4
♣KJ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E ♠9 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣A 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
600 0.00 2.00 3N E ♦2 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
4 |
♠864
♥QJ9865
♦Q4
♣J4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠T
♥-
♦J8763
♣AQ98732
|
♠AJ73
♥AT
♦AKT52
♣65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠6 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 7NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
190 2.00 0.00 4♣ W +3 ♥6 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
600 1.00 1.00 3N E ♠5 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
640 0.00 2.00 5♦ E +2 ♠K 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
5 |
♠J85
♥9
♦Q96
♣QT9752
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KT3
♥Q652
♦T432
♣86
|
♠9642
♥K874
♦AJ5
♣AK
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 3♣ N ♥4 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
120 1.00 1.00 1N E +1 ♥3 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
180 0.00 2.00 1N* E ♥3 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
|
6 |
♠K9
♥AKQ3
♦AJ76532
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q843
♥T84
♦Q9
♣QT75
|
♠T
♥J765
♦KT4
♣A9632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2/3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 ♣3 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ S -1 ♣5 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
100 0.00 2.00 6♠ S -2 ♣5 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
|
7 |
♠A9863
♥AT5
♦J8
♣732
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠KQT
♥743
♦Q7
♣QJ864
|
♠J72
♥K862
♦KT9643
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1/-♥ ♣5 ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦T 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
110 1.50 0.50 2♠ N ♦6 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
200 0.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♦Q 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
8 |
♠AT53
♥763
♦K83
♣987
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠K72
♥K852
♦AT76
♣65
|
♠Q986
♥94
♦QJ9
♣QJT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♦6 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
90 1.00 1.00 1N S ♦6 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -2 ♦Q 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
9 |
♠Q9
♥9843
♦Q98
♣J642
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T63
♥A62
♦J743
♣Q75
|
♠854
♥KQJT7
♦K52
♣KT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ 1NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♠A 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♠A 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥A 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
10 |
♠AK9
♥Q976
♦QT74
♣J9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠JT6
♥T52
♦K8532
♣K5
|
♠Q853
♥AKJ
♦A
♣A8642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♥6 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
140 1.00 1.00 1♠ E +2 ♥8 4-Sullivan-Nuccio vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
600 0.00 2.00 3N W ♥6 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
11 |
♠T9732
♥8
♦AK32
♣JT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ8
♥KQJ43
♦76
♣Q85
|
♠J6
♥T952
♦QT5
♣6432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♣6/7 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥4 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ S ♥K 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
100 0.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♥K 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
12 |
♠KT94
♥A72
♦KJ3
♣854
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AJ73
♥9843
♦T5
♣Q97
|
♠Q85
♥QT6
♦A9762
♣AJ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 1♠ 2/1NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♣2 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ W -1 ♠4 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥6 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
|
13 |
♠J85
♥JT6
♦T652
♣J63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠QT72
♥K2
♦Q974
♣T95
|
♠6
♥9753
♦AKJ
♣AKQ42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♣ E +1 ♠A 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
130 1.00 1.00 2♣ E +2 ♠A 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
400 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -4 ♣T 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
|
14 |
♠A98742
♥T8
♦852
♣T5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠KT3
♥KQ54
♦KT4
♣Q63
|
♠J5
♥J932
♦J93
♣K842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/2♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♦6/8 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♥ 1NT ♣7/6 ♦5 ♠5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S ♥K 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♥K 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
50 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣3 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
|
15 |
♠AKQ
♥932
♦AQJ97
♣T6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠4
♥AKT765
♦8
♣AKQ97
|
♠T87652
♥J4
♦K3
♣432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 2♥ W +3 ♠A 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
200 1.50 0.50 4♦ N -2 ♥J 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 3-Granby-Goodsell
800 0.00 2.00 5♦* N -3 ♥J 5-Slizyk-Seidel vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
16 |
♠K9432
♥6
♦AQ986
♣K6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AJ8
♥832
♦K52
♣J954
|
♠65
♥KJT54
♦T4
♣AQT2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♦ 4/3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦2/3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ N ♥4 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +1 ♣A 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
50 0.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦T 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
17 |
♠J63
♥T764
♦A7642
♣3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠A8752
♥8
♦K3
♣AT752
|
♠9
♥AKJ932
♦QT5
♣964
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2N N -1 ♠9 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣K 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -3 ♠A 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
18 |
♠Q732
♥A
♦96532
♣T84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠KJT98
♥QT93
♦-
♣9752
|
♠A54
♥K76
♦AQT74
♣KQ
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
50 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥A 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
200 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +3 ♥4 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
19 |
♠AJ7642
♥2
♦T8
♣AKQJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠K9
♥Q53
♦A97642
♣T5
|
♠Q5
♥AT64
♦K5
♣98643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
170 1.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♦5 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♣9 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
20 |
♠62
♥T76532
♦K8
♣853
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ875
♥AJ9
♦T9
♣J74
|
♠A43
♥Q
♦AQJ642
♣KQ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4/3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ E +1 ♥4 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
600 1.00 1.00 5♦ E ♠T 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 1-Eggert-Kantro
660 0.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♣8 2-Potter-Schoensee vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
21 |
♠AQT3
♥A2
♦QJT9
♣Q65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠954
♥KQ3
♦A86
♣9742
|
♠J62
♥96
♦K532
♣KT83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 2.00 0.00 2N N +3 ♣3 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
100 0.50 1.50 4♠ N -1 ♣3 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
100 0.50 1.50 4♥ N -1 ♣3 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
22 |
♠A943
♥T7
♦AQ53
♣J32
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠J6
♥Q5
♦J964
♣AK654
|
♠KT2
♥AKJ62
♦KT7
♣97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♠5 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
180 1.00 1.00 1N W +3 ♦3 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
600 0.00 2.00 3N E ♠5 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
23 |
♠AKJ98
♥2
♦AJ9
♣AK97
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠Q
♥KQJT95
♦75
♣T653
|
♠7542
♥864
♦Q642
♣Q2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 7♦ 1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♥4 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥4 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
260 0.00 2.00 3♠ N +4 ♥6 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
|
24 |
♠Q965
♥KQ92
♦AQ54
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠A4
♥A8654
♦KJ2
♣QT5
|
♠KJ87
♥7
♦863
♣KJ642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3/4♣ -/1♦ -/1♥ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦6/7 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2N N -1 ♥7 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
100 1.00 1.00 2♦ N -2 ♥7 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
120 0.00 2.00 2N W ♥2 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|
25 |
♠KQJT863
♥KJ2
♦2
♣T5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠-
♥A96
♦AQT97643
♣94
|
♠A952
♥T3
♦K8
♣KQJ87
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 3♠ N ♦K 1-Eggert-Kantro vs 4-Sullivan-Nuccio
620 0.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 ♠K 3-Granby-Goodsell vs 2-Potter-Schoensee
620 0.50 1.50 5♦ W +1 ♠K 6-Jaynes-Whitaker vs 5-Slizyk-Seidel
|