1 |
♠KJ95
♥T74
♦65
♣KQ63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠7
♥KJ9863
♦K7
♣JT84
|
♠Q8643
♥Q
♦QJ3
♣A972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 6-McCain-Bache vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
100 3.00 1.00 5-Vance-Laws vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
50 2.00 2.00 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 6-Yost-Meyers
140 1.00 3.00 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
150 0.00 4.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Cass-Cass
|
2 |
♠KJ
♥QT965
♦Q2
♣8765
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠AQ8
♥AK7
♦KJT75
♣K3
|
♠653
♥J43
♦A93
♣AQJ9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦0 ♥2 ♠3 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 6/7♦ 4/5♥ 4♠ 6/7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Cass-Cass
180 3.00 1.00 5-Vance-Laws vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
430 2.00 2.00 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 6-Yost-Meyers
990 1.00 3.00 6-McCain-Bache vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
1020 0.00 4.00 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
|
3 |
♠2
♥AK42
♦AKT954
♣A9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
♠AKT3
♥QT
♦QJ72
♣764
|
♠J9875
♥J987
♦-
♣QJ52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2/3♥ 1/3NT ♣6 ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
90 3.00 1.00 5-Vance-Laws vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
50 1.50 2.50 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 1-Cass-Cass
50 1.50 2.50 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 6-Yost-Meyers
110 0.00 4.00 6-McCain-Bache vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
4 |
♠76
♥AKQ94
♦J93
♣T53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
♠QJ9
♥8
♦A8764
♣AKQ6
|
♠KT85
♥JT62
♦2
♣8742
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 5-Vance-Laws vs 1-Cass-Cass
100 2.00 2.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 6-Yost-Meyers
100 2.00 2.00 6-McCain-Bache vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
110 0.13 3.88 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
5 |
♠K43
♥KQ7
♦Q42
♣AK72
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
♠QJ985
♥T86
♦AJ5
♣64
|
♠72
♥J32
♦K86
♣J9853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 6-McCain-Bache vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
170 2.63 1.38 5-Vance-Laws vs 1-Cass-Cass
120 1.38 2.63 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 6-Yost-Meyers
100 0.13 3.88 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
6 |
♠AJT9
♥94
♦QJ84
♣K76
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
♠Q652
♥K8
♦AT2
♣5432
|
♠743
♥QJT32
♦63
♣JT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.25 0.75 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 6-Yost-Meyers
430 3.25 0.75 6-McCain-Bache vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
400 0.75 3.25 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
400 0.75 3.25 5-Vance-Laws vs 1-Cass-Cass
|
7 |
♠T
♥J843
♦A732
♣JT95
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
♠J92
♥Q
♦KJ9654
♣862
|
♠AQ8764
♥AT765
♦-
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 5-Vance-Laws vs 6-Yost-Meyers
170 2.63 1.38 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
200 1.38 2.63 2-Glover-Richard vs 1-Cass-Cass
680 0.13 3.88 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
8 |
♠KQT
♥T86
♦AK4
♣JT53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
♠9
♥QJ7532
♦5
♣AQ872
|
♠8753
♥AK94
♦QT72
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
200 2.63 1.38 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
750 1.38 2.63 5-Vance-Laws vs 6-Yost-Meyers
1400 0.13 3.88 2-Glover-Richard vs 1-Cass-Cass
|
9 |
♠KQ86
♥QT9
♦7
♣K8732
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
♠75
♥K843
♦863
♣AT54
|
♠9432
♥J7
♦AQ952
♣Q9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.25 0.75 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
110 3.25 0.75 2-Glover-Richard vs 1-Cass-Cass
100 1.38 2.63 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
150 0.13 3.88 5-Vance-Laws vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
10 |
♠T93
♥J62
♦K9
♣AJT54
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
♠AKJ642
♥T
♦J753
♣73
|
♠8
♥9875
♦T842
♣Q986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ -/1♦ 4♥ -/2♠ 1/5NT ♦6/7 ♠6/8 |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.63 1.38 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
660 2.63 1.38 2-Glover-Richard vs 6-Yost-Meyers
660 2.63 1.38 6-McCain-Bache vs 1-Cass-Cass
650 0.13 3.88 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
|
11 |
♠K87
♥Q987
♦976
♣J96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
♠AQ642
♥AT32
♦J52
♣A
|
♠J
♥J64
♦QT43
♣KQT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT4/5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 2-Glover-Richard vs 6-Yost-Meyers
50 3.25 0.75 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
110 1.38 2.63 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
140 0.13 3.88 6-McCain-Bache vs 1-Cass-Cass
|
12 |
♠QJ54
♥J
♦942
♣KT742
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K863
♥7654
♦AQ87
♣Q
|
♠A97
♥KQ32
♦K53
♣963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
50 2.00 2.00 1-Beaton-Mogilner vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
50 2.00 2.00 2-Glover-Richard vs 6-Yost-Meyers
110 0.13 3.88 6-McCain-Bache vs 1-Cass-Cass
|
13 |
♠KJ
♥K73
♦A43
♣AK942
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
♠AT95
♥J8
♦QT875
♣76
|
♠76432
♥QT642
♦-
♣T53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.88 0.13 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
630 2.00 2.00 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 1-Cass-Cass
630 2.00 2.00 5-Vance-Laws vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
200 0.13 3.88 2-Glover-Richard vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
|
14 |
♠53
♥AQ5
♦KJ7
♣KQ764
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
♠KJ
♥JT64
♦965
♣J952
|
♠AQ9
♥9873
♦AQ2
♣A83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
90 2.63 1.38 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 1-Cass-Cass
100 1.38 2.63 2-Glover-Richard vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
120 0.13 3.88 5-Vance-Laws vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
|
15 |
♠Q
♥AQT84
♦AJ32
♣A72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
♠82
♥K7632
♦64
♣J865
|
♠T7543
♥9
♦KQT7
♣KQ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 5-Vance-Laws vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
120 2.63 1.38 4-Elphick-Cleary vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
100 1.38 2.63 2-Glover-Richard vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
200 0.13 3.88 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 1-Cass-Cass
|
16 |
♠KJ63
♥KQ2
♦Q95
♣T75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
♠T987
♥A9863
♦A32
♣2
|
♠A52
♥T74
♦KJ87
♣AK3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 6-McCain-Bache vs 6-Yost-Meyers
100 2.63 1.38 5-Vance-Laws vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
120 1.38 2.63 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
620 0.13 3.88 2-Glover-Richard vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
|
17 |
♠T97532
♥A654
♦Q2
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
♠QJ8
♥9
♦JT953
♣KQ92
|
♠K64
♥KJT87
♦-
♣AJ865
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ ♣2 ♥6/5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 5-Vance-Laws vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
100 2.63 1.38 2-Glover-Richard vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
150 1.38 2.63 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
550 0.13 3.88 6-McCain-Bache vs 6-Yost-Meyers
|
18 |
♠JT5
♥KQJ
♦QT
♣AKJT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
♠K42
♥542
♦K764
♣Q32
|
♠AQ87
♥AT8
♦AJ5
♣965
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: -/1♣ 1/2♦ -/1♥ 2♠ 2/3NT ♣6/7 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.88 0.13 5-Vance-Laws vs 4-Gozesky-Weien
120 2.00 2.00 3-Fink-Van Sickle vs 5-Humphreys-Humphreys
120 2.00 2.00 6-McCain-Bache vs 6-Yost-Meyers
140 0.13 3.88 2-Glover-Richard vs 3-Alvarado-Van Sickle
|